Pricing- per animal charge
#1937891
04/06/10 02:48 PM
04/06/10 02:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 637 n.w missouri
N.W.MISSOURI
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 637
n.w missouri
|
I have started doing a little ADC work I am getting a few more jobs to do my question is what do some of you guys charge per animal from moles to beaver please pm me with any help
I haven't had this much fun since I was knee high to a grasshopper
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#1938515
04/06/10 08:39 PM
04/06/10 08:39 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 637 n.w missouri
N.W.MISSOURI
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 637
n.w missouri
|
There is only one guy with in 25 miles of me that I can find doing ADC work and I called him he pretty much told me to go to south of heaven
I haven't had this much fun since I was knee high to a grasshopper
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: N.W.MISSOURI]
#1938575
04/06/10 09:02 PM
04/06/10 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,875 Gainesville, Alachua, Florida,...
Robb Russell
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,875
Gainesville, Alachua, Florida,...
|
You know when I started my competition never said nothing and refused to. So had the wife call around and she got prices over the phone as a customer and I was able to get some favorable base to start with. I gave up on per animal charges just did not work for me too many variables and to me all a job was my windshield time, time on the property, use of my equipment, wear and tear and baits and lures. NW Missouri tell me your town and county and I should be able to tell you who is and not in your area. Guys drive farther for the bigger bat and bird jobs . The average critter on the ground mileage is about 45 miles. I know guys who go further and many that won't even drive 20. For a free listing in Missouri go here http://thewildlifepro.net/?q=forum/70All other US, Canada go here http://thewildlifepro.net/?q=forumIn Sarasota Fl my whole area of business usually was within 13 miles of my home but I had over a half million population to work with and all the beach resort areas.Traffic was a big variable and my worst enemy even working 13 miles from home.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1938797
04/06/10 10:46 PM
04/06/10 10:46 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 25 Glenwood Springs Colorado
nighthunter2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 25
Glenwood Springs Colorado
|
I Do a Inspection an set up fee which covers my drive time an time at the job site an then a per animal fee to pay for baits carcass disposal, an them any other expense I have for that job. I do not do the per animal fee with bats or birds.
Joe Herrman Paramount Wildlife Management Glenwood Springs (970)309-0865 paramountwm@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: nighthunter2]
#1938821
04/06/10 11:01 PM
04/06/10 11:01 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
I Do a Inspection an set up fee which covers my drive time an time at the job site an then a per animal fee to pay for baits carcass disposal, an them any other expense I have for that job. I do the same set up/ inspection fee for jobs that I charge per animal. But my question is do you charge the same per animal fee regardless of the animal? If you charge $50 for a raccoon do you charge more for a coyote or less for a mole? I couldn't see charging the same for a beaver and a vole and that is why I switched to set prices for certain animals.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1938895
04/06/10 11:45 PM
04/06/10 11:45 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 25 Glenwood Springs Colorado
nighthunter2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 25
Glenwood Springs Colorado
|
Yes my per animal fees very from different types of animals an depending on the area I live near a few rich towns such as Aspen an Snowmass so my per beaver fees vary from 100 dollers up to 250 dollers depending on how hard it is to set the stupid suitcase traps that we are now reduced to use in the state of colorado. They scare me to I feel more comfortable settin a 330 conibear then those live beaver traps.
Joe Herrman Paramount Wildlife Management Glenwood Springs (970)309-0865 paramountwm@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: coyotecrazy]
#1940765
04/07/10 10:07 PM
04/07/10 10:07 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 313 Mocksville, NC
nccoyote
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 313
Mocksville, NC
|
Starting adc, I've read posts on here to base pricing. Everything but coyote, I charge per animal, coyote, I charge 50 a head, plus 50 a month for keeping the service running on ranches/farms depending on travel/ mileage. You must not be doing ADC full time. That's way too cheap for coyote work.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: nccoyote]
#1940784
04/07/10 10:16 PM
04/07/10 10:16 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
Starting adc, I've read posts on here to base pricing. Everything but coyote, I charge per animal, coyote, I charge 50 a head, plus 50 a month for keeping the service running on ranches/farms depending on travel/ mileage. You must not be doing ADC full time. That's way too cheap for coyote work. I was thinking the same thing but didn't want to be the one to say anything. I would go broke at $50 a head
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1940838
04/07/10 10:33 PM
04/07/10 10:33 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,807 southern Minnesota
BUD25
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,807
southern Minnesota
|
for True predator control, acreage, type of property, woods, field, pasture... all depends. say for a job 20 miles away for predator reduction. 1 months time,(traps ran everyday) traps for coyotes, fox, coon and skunk... $2-5K good luck.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: coyotecrazy]
#1940983
04/07/10 11:16 PM
04/07/10 11:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 173 Valdez, Alaska
trapperandy
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 173
Valdez, Alaska
|
How do you go about starting up adc work? I imagin it varies from state to state
NEVER GET BETWEEN A MAN AND HIS TRAP COYOTE-0 MARTEN-0 LYNX---0 ERMINE-0 FOX----0 WOLVERINE-0 GRINNERS--0
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: warrior]
#1941182
04/08/10 01:28 AM
04/08/10 01:28 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 711 IN
Jon A
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 711
IN
|
Please don't take offense, but not being independantly wealthy this ain't no hobby for me. It is all about the money. x2 Business is business, no matter what business you are in. It is ALWAYS all about money.....or you won't be in business anymore.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: warrior]
#1941207
04/08/10 01:56 AM
04/08/10 01:56 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 164 northern Calif.
Probtrapper
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 164
northern Calif.
|
Warrior is darn sure right about the 50 dollar coyote, but this subject has been hashed over a lot on this site. The simple truth is which ever works for you in your area is the way to charge for your services. We do, in fact, charge a one time service call (set up fee if you like) and then charge per animal caught. We've been doing it this way for almost 17 yrs. and it has worked well for us. I'am not saying by any means it is the best or the only way to charge but again, it works well for us. As for it opening the door to being dishonest if you're a crook you'll be a crook no matter how you charge. Over 97% of our new business comes from word of mouth referrals comming from past customers so I guess we're doing something right.
Bob
Last edited by Probtrapper; 04/08/10 01:57 AM.
Bob Hassel Animal Nuisance Control
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: coyotecrazy]
#1941484
04/08/10 09:50 AM
04/08/10 09:50 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
My competition being all about the money, is why I have no competition.
What you are doing is driving down the prices for everyone. You love to get up and be in the woods and that is great, I think everyone does. But I think you would love to be in the woods just as much if you were charging an acceptable fee. But like you said, your not a business, your a trapper. But whether your a trapper or a business the fact still remains that you are putting your assets at risk every time you set a trap.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: warrior]
#1942250
04/08/10 06:59 PM
04/08/10 06:59 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30 St. Louis area
Dave Schmidt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
St. Louis area
|
David, I respectfully disagree about the per-animal charge. I provide a customized service that is priced to A. solve the problem, and B. make me money. If I can't do both, I can't stay in business. I find that a per-catch fee is most fair, because nobody really knows how many targets need to be removed. I'm doing a job right now in which one of the local "trap-setters" (i.e., PCO's with some box traps) utterly screwed up. Did a lot of (crummy) work, took the customer's money, but DID NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM. Their new bid to take another blind stab at the problem is a number they obviously pulled right out of their a...thletic supporters. I have no idea how they arrived at this lump sum, and I'm sure they don't either. They would surely make money on this job becuz they take shortcut after shortcut. I used to work for these chiselers, and I know how they would cheat a customer rather than take a loss. Point is, I guess, is that there is more than one way to skin a cat, and I price things to make good money on (nearly) every job. Both you and I have enuf experience to know how to price jobs, and for myself, I price in the variables. It makes for a more complicated bid, but the a la carte pricing seems to be most fair to me. As for fur trappers who would invest $49.95 in time and capital for a $50 'yote, yeah, that ain't business...that's a HOBBY,... and, with all due respect, they'll find out soon enough (hopefully not the hard way--being sued without insurance). I used to do rodeo photography, ran it as a business, didn't have insurance (yes, the bulls were real, and sometimes they were real mad, and sometimes they would gladly try to take their frustrations out on innocent ol' me, the photographer) VERY STUPID, from a bidness standpoint. No way could I make a living at it at that level, but I friggin' loved it!!
Last edited by Dave Schmidt; 04/08/10 07:16 PM.
ALL OUT Wildlife Control
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: warrior]
#1942364
04/08/10 07:57 PM
04/08/10 07:57 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,591 SW Pa
Bob Jameson
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,591
SW Pa
|
After many years in the business I have gone the gambit of charges and have seen the benefit and negatives of each type of charges. I finally settled on a per trip charge as per our contract language and at times I charge per trip and per animal. This is dependent upon the job whether it is commercial or residential also. When you charge per animal you can get burnt many times over if you just have ordinary circumstances occur. Such as someone or something sets off your traps, moves your traps, non target catches, you catch the neighbors cat etc. You have to go back at your cost to re set or service your traps.It becomes a loss of income if you or your employees have to go back for work and no pay.That gets old fast. A good business will try to always have compensation paid for his or her time for most all services. Granted we all do some freebee token services at times but for the most part it is business as usual. You will eventually learn the ropes and what jobs will require multiple catches and charging per trip always pays for your time and covers the animal charge too. If I set up a coon job and feel I may be catching other target animals in the process as well or multiple coons I bid a per trip charge. If I remove one or 3 coons on that trip I am already there anyways. If I bid it for $85 to $125 per trip regardless of the catch number I am still ahead.The time for most removals is under 30 mins per stop with removals and re sets when multiple traps are incorporated. The guy charging $50 an animal will sometimes run into a problem with costs when the multi animal scenario shows up. Then the consumers are prone to get upset.Then they talk to a per trip business operation and that business may likely end up with the job if the customers are price shopping and do the math. I have a friend who is close to my business and he is a per animal job bidder. We usually both get the same calls at times and when they do the math with per animal vs per trip we usually get the job. When he has interference and set off traps and non target catches he has to go back at his expense and time to do trap maintenance. I have gone round and round explaining to him the animal charge isnt working well for his business over 60% of the jobs he does he has return trips for fired traps or interference. Mole jobs I sell 10 day programs initially for most residence jobs.I make 3-4 checks in that 10 day program.Depending on the distance traveled and the size of the project.I usually charge $350 to $600 per program. Not per catch. Persistant or probable reinfestation jobs I will sell a seasonal program.The last few mole jobs I sold were all over $500 and up and they couldnt wait to give me a check.Doesnt that make a fella feel like he is under charging for his services.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Bob Jameson]
#1942535
04/08/10 08:59 PM
04/08/10 08:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
When I charge per animal it is exactly that "PER ANIMAL" it don't matter if it is the neighbors cat or a snake. If it is in my trap they are charged for it. The key to this is knowledge of what bait to use to prevent incidental catches, but nothing is fool proof.
I offset the empty trap runs by charging milage for any distance over 10 miles.
Perfect example. I did a skunk job last week. Customer swore he had 3 skunks in a hole under a barn. I drove 36 miles one way to set up the job. Customer knew it was per animal, milage, plus my set up fee. Told him he could save a few bucks by checking the traps in the morning and avoid paying me milage for checking empty traps. He was happy with that. First night had 2 skunks, second night nothing. After 2 more days nothing. Didn't drive out and he didn't get charged. Last day I showed up picked up my gear dropped off an invoice and was done. He ended up only paying milage for 2 days and he was happy and I was happy. If I would of bid that job as a set price I would of charged a lot more than what I made, but I think the customer would of been upset since he thought he had more than what he did.
Like Paul said, you will never get everyone to agree on what is better. I do both set prices and per animal depending on the job. But regardless if its per animal or per job I always charge an hourly rate for exclusion work. That never gets added into the set price or per animal price.
Last edited by krausen; 04/08/10 09:01 PM.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Bob Jameson]
#1942646
04/08/10 09:41 PM
04/08/10 09:41 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,807 southern Minnesota
BUD25
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,807
southern Minnesota
|
Mole jobs I sell 10 day programs initially for most residence jobs.I make 3-4 checks in that 10 day program.Depending on the distance traveled and the size of the project.I usually charge $350 to $600 per program. Not per catch. Persistant or probable reinfestation jobs I will sell a seasonal program.The last few mole jobs I sold were all over $500 and up and they couldnt wait to give me a check.Doesnt that make a fella feel like he is under charging for his services. If you dont mind me asking, what do you charge for a seasonal mole control contract?
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: coyotecrazy]
#1944536
04/09/10 10:00 PM
04/09/10 10:00 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 25 Glenwood Springs Colorado
nighthunter2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 25
Glenwood Springs Colorado
|
Here are my thoughts on charging. We have a Kill that the general public does not. If the general public could trap a skunk under there house they would do it themselves. The people will pay a plumber a 115 doller show up fee to come an fix there plumbing problem. If the custumer does not like your price at the time, they can live with that smelly skunk till the women of the house can not stand the skunk smell anymore. They will call you back an pay your prices. Dont kiss the custumers [Please excuse my language... I'm an idiot] just cuz they feel the price is to much. I had a guy ask me for a 50% percent discount on a 100 doller job an I told him no he called me back 3 weeks later an I told him that I was kinda of busy an for me to get to hime it was going to be a 500 doller job an the client payed it. So there is some food for thought.
Joe Herrman Paramount Wildlife Management Glenwood Springs (970)309-0865 paramountwm@yahoo.com
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: nighthunter2]
#1944680
04/09/10 10:48 PM
04/09/10 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843 NH
sgs
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843
NH
|
If the general public could trap a skunk under there house they would do it themselves. Actually most homeowners, at least in my area, are perfectly capable of trapping a skunk. It's what do they do with it, once they catch it, that's the problem. People are very afraid of getting sprayed. When I tell a potential customer that it's going to be $75 to check out the area and set traps and then $50 for each animal I catch, they look at me like I'm nuts. "A hundred and twenty-five dollars to catch a skunk!!??" I always tell them that they can go down to the hardware store and buy a $35 trap and catch it themselves. "But then what are you going to do with it?" Most times I can see the wheels turning in their head and after a minute or so $125 doesn't sound so bad. lol
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: ]
#1945533
04/10/10 03:32 PM
04/10/10 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 637 n.w missouri
N.W.MISSOURI
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 637
n.w missouri
|
I appreciate all the feed back
I haven't had this much fun since I was knee high to a grasshopper
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: N.W.MISSOURI]
#1946787
04/11/10 11:30 AM
04/11/10 11:30 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843 NH
sgs
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 843
NH
|
I can not think of the last time I trapped anything for $125... That seems to be the going rate around here. There's no shortage of ADC companies around. That might be the problem.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: ]
#1948633
04/12/10 04:36 PM
04/12/10 04:36 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 135 West Point, Texas
ChrisL2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 135
West Point, Texas
|
Don't want to high-jack this thread, but I would like some suggestions on a job some folks want to hire me for.
I have a potential beaver job in a neighborhood subdivision, only it is 80+ miles aways from where I live.
I charge a set-up/consultation/inspection fee of $100 and then charge for the job. But this is my FIRST subdivision job and I know I'll have kids, dogs and cat roaming and most likely traps/sets fooled-with and possibly taken, stolen, etc.
I would only be able to work on this Friday-Sunday. How would you approach this type of set-up and especially with the 1.5 hr travel one way?
All recommendations/suggestions appreciated and please do not spare my feelings on this one.
Share your trapping, hunting & fishing time with others, especially those that are less fortunate and our youth!
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1948665
04/12/10 05:06 PM
04/12/10 05:06 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 135 West Point, Texas
ChrisL2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 135
West Point, Texas
|
Oh, that is written in my contract agreement already...
Looking for hourly charge since it's over 160 miles round trip and would any of you attempt this job with it being in a neighborhood with kiddos and pets...naturally plenty of teenagers up to no-good. All my past jobs have been rural and no problem with those, but this is a total different ball of wax.
Share your trapping, hunting & fishing time with others, especially those that are less fortunate and our youth!
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1948757
04/12/10 05:49 PM
04/12/10 05:49 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 135 West Point, Texas
ChrisL2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 135
West Point, Texas
|
Nothing else going on right now on the burners...
Share your trapping, hunting & fishing time with others, especially those that are less fortunate and our youth!
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Charles Holt]
#1950010
04/13/10 12:20 PM
04/13/10 12:20 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30 St. Louis area
Dave Schmidt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
St. Louis area
|
Good story, Charles...Joe, I gotta laugh about the guy who wants fifty bucks off a hunnert-dollar job. Ask him if he'll buy your groceries for a week...
ALL OUT Wildlife Control
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: ]
#1950014
04/13/10 12:22 PM
04/13/10 12:22 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30 St. Louis area
Dave Schmidt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 30
St. Louis area
|
Not so much you get what you pay for as you DON'T get what you DON'T pay for. Regarding the beaver job in the subdivision I suggest keeping it on the QT as much as possible...not because you are sneaking around or are ashamed of your activities, but people will be VERY interested in what you are doing, and the whole neighborhood will soon know about it, including kids who will mess with your sets. My plan of action when dealing with the local tenants is A. Don't advertise your presence. B. Don't speak to tenants unless spoken to. If they ask what you are doing, tell 'em "I'm doing some work for the management." Period. C. Keep people from seeing your traps as much as possible without seeming sneaky.
Last edited by Dave Schmidt; 04/13/10 12:32 PM.
ALL OUT Wildlife Control
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: wolfpak382usa]
#1952830
04/15/10 01:06 AM
04/15/10 01:06 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
since my closest competition that i know of is billy the exterminator with vexcon about 100 miles west of me. For a chance to be on TV I wouldn't doubt if people all over your State aren't calling Billy to see how far he will travel.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1952836
04/15/10 01:16 AM
04/15/10 01:16 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,191 Mt. Olive, IL
Ron Scheller
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,191
Mt. Olive, IL
|
If Billy is your "competition", you should be doing quite well..... I can't even watch the show due to the constant footage of improper methods (animal handling, safety, no PPE's, etc). I know it's "only TV", but that show is doing more damage to our industry and image than can be measured.
Ron Scheller
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: wolfpak382usa]
#1953211
04/15/10 12:37 PM
04/15/10 12:37 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
and yea since his tv show i have gotten alot more calls. I think the only good thing he has done for this area is open peoples eyes to the wildlife control business. That is exactly what I have said since day one. Like Billy or hate him that is up to you. But to say he is ruining our business is a joke. The guy is creating business for us by showing the uninformed that we exist and are here to help them. Ron I am not sure how much damage he can do to our image if the majority of the public does not even know we exist??? Reminds me of years ago when I was doing work for the cable company and the movie "cable guy" came out. Every house I went to they would make some stupid comment about the movie. Did that movie do a cable company employee's image any good? Nope, but everyone who needs cable still calls. Same can be said for Billy. So a customer might say "You don't look like Billy" , who cares. You still got the job and shortly their money and solved their problem. If it is a new customer their is a chance they knew you existed because of Billy. You might not like that he is unsafe, don't hire him as your employee. And like you said don't watch the show, but I think it is unfair to say he is causing damage to our image without any proof to back up that claim. You wouldn't want someone going around saying you are damaging the image of our profession because you do more than just wildlife work.
Last edited by krausen; 04/15/10 12:44 PM.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Robb Russell]
#1953256
04/15/10 01:07 PM
04/15/10 01:07 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
Come on Robb. Your gonna try to tell me Billy getting busted for dope is gonna prevent your phone from ringing? If Billy is smoking then he should get busted and whatever the punishment is for that in Louisiana should be enforced. But Billy getting busted will have no effect on your business and I am confident not one of your customers is going to start to think that because Billy got busted you must smoke also. Now if it was an employee of yours who got busted well then that changes things. The reality of it is that dope is a very popular drug and I am sure every person knows at least one who does smoke.I do not see how Billy getting busted has any effect on any of us. Did the United States stop electing Presidents because the other Billy admitted to toking??
Last edited by krausen; 04/15/10 01:09 PM.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Nathan Krause]
#1953273
04/15/10 01:26 PM
04/15/10 01:26 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,875 Gainesville, Alachua, Florida,...
Robb Russell
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,875
Gainesville, Alachua, Florida,...
|
Krausen if you are happy with his image and it works for you fine! I find he has the knowledge of some dirt poor,trap for a can of beer trapper myself and it is now obvious he also works for an entirely other kind of roaches and not just a can of beer. Maybe he can get rid of the rats in the prisons for awhile! Personally I am offended by his lack of any real knowledge of handling nuisance animal problems and his misuse of his celebrity status and showing the public the wrong way to do things. If he only stuck to insect related problems I would have no problem with him at all. Did the United States stop electing Presidents because the other Billy admitted to toking??
Well I can assure you I never voted for that dope smoking, I never had sex with Monica Lewinsky idiot and liar either!
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Robb Russell]
#1953313
04/15/10 01:59 PM
04/15/10 01:59 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
At no point did I say I agree with Billy's image. All I said is that Billy has no effect on YOUR image.
As far as his knowledge I do not know the man and will not comment on his knowledge or lack of, but I think I remember someone saying he has a degree of some sorts in wildlife biology or something similar.
I have not seen every episode of his show but I have seen a few and while his tactics are not the norm I do not recall seeing anything he has done that was so out of control and risked the safety of any animal. He risks his own safety constantly and that is "for TV" I am sure. If he wants to wear motorcycle chaps to handle a snake that is up to him. If he wants to spray bees in his T shirt and sun glasses that is his choice.
If a home owner is dumb enough to immitate Billy that is their choice and they were given that choice the minute they signed the mortgage. When they mess it up and call a professional I am sure they will be charged accordingly to fix what they messed up. I have no problem with that either.
I didn't say you did vote for him. I was just using him as a point that Billy and his legal problems will not prevent people from calling a WCO if they need help.
I wonder if the loggers get all upset at watching axe men or if the guys on the oil rigs get upset over that show or the race car drivers get upset over mad house??? These shows are exactly that- TV SHOWS! I think you guys give Billy a lot more stock than is really neccessary.
I don't know if I would go as far as to call him a celebrity. lol
Last edited by krausen; 04/15/10 02:00 PM.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Robb Russell]
#1953366
04/15/10 02:33 PM
04/15/10 02:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
I don't think having a TV show makes you a celebrity. But maybe my time in Los Angeles gives me that impression.
In reality people are stupid. If a home owner watches Billy spray bees in a T shirt and thinks that they won't get stung doing the same thing then maybe they need to get stung. Being stupid is not a license to sue, well maybe it is....that is what is wrong with this Country.
I am pretty sure Billy has said in every episode he has been doing this for 20 years? I don't consider that entry level.
Yes it would be GREAT if we had someone on TV like Bob, but then the show would get cancelled after the first episode because nobody would watch it.
I am a firm believer in taking action. If you don't like Billy then petition his removal from the air or make a show that is better and get rich at the same time.
Maybe it is the age difference. Being younger than most (32) maybe I don't see Billy as the threat the older gentlemen do.
I guess it don't matter. You think Billy is going to ruin your image and I think Billy (drug bust or not) makes the phone ring all around the Country.
But we all agree that Billy is a "moron" in one way or another.
(and none of this has anything to do with "per animal charge" ) LOL
Last edited by krausen; 04/15/10 02:38 PM.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: wolfpak382usa]
#1953383
04/15/10 02:45 PM
04/15/10 02:45 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
and that was billy's brother ricky who was busted if that really makes any difference
For Robb and my conversation it makes a world of difference. But other than that, not really. Ricky is such a small part of the show it wasn't even worth making it news. lol
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#1953401
04/15/10 03:02 PM
04/15/10 03:02 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,875 Gainesville, Alachua, Florida,...
Robb Russell
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,875
Gainesville, Alachua, Florida,...
|
Robb said something interesting also about experts letting you down. There was a guy in our business that I had a lot of respect for. He is now in the slammer as a sex offender. Talk about a let-down!
Yeah NWCOA had a CWCP in Indiana or Illinois in the slammer as a sex offender too! They were supposed to strip away his certification and not sure if that ever happened.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Robb Russell]
#1953417
04/15/10 03:18 PM
04/15/10 03:18 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
Here is the problem with Billy's Show. None of us know what techniques he used before TV came along. As far as any of us know REXCON came into existance for TV. The black and leather and studs could all of been the work of the producers.
I use per animal charges a lot. I only use set prices for certain jobs.
I have taken many safeguards that I have learned the hard way. When I first got started I didn't have this great resource. Everything was trial and error.
I had traps stolen that weren't part of contract and I had to eat the cost. Learned to make sure customer knew and signed that THEY are responsible for the safety of my equipment. I learned the hard way at catches being released. Going to location and seeing cage empty but bait has been eaten. And land owner saying "thats strange" what is strange now is the look when I tell them a tampered trap counts as a catch.
I got started doing nuisance wildlife removal as a kid with a single cage trap and a neighborhood full of grateful gardeners. lol
Then when I worked for the cable company I saw how much damage squirrels do to a home and at the time more importantly to me (a cable line). So I started removing squirrels for our cable customers. Got a start again in Colorado doing coyote control for ranchers, but that didn't count since I never charged.
Then when I moved back to Wisconsin I took it up again part time around my full time job. I am a new guy in this business, but not a knew guy to business.
Last edited by krausen; 04/15/10 03:31 PM.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: coyotecrazy]
#1953775
04/15/10 08:10 PM
04/15/10 08:10 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361 mequon, wisconsin
Paul Winkelmann
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,361
mequon, wisconsin
|
Robb, we're actually talking about the same guy. That whole thing affected a lot of us personally. I'd just like to throw this out for everyone, it seems none of these criminal acts were done while sobor. Something to think about.
Nathan, once again you've nailed it! I'm guessing that this year Billy will make more money than Obama and they've just posted his earnings. When you get a producer, director, and camera crew involved in your business, change is inevitable. Who wouldn't enjoy interviewing Billy and find out how much of this real and how much is Hollywood.
We've already had more fun with this topic than I ever thought possible. If you're having a good 2010 it's because of you. not Billy. And if not, that's not Billy's fault either.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: Paul Winkelmann]
#1953781
04/15/10 08:14 PM
04/15/10 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
We've already had more fun with this topic than I ever thought possible. If you're having a good 2010 it's because of you. not Billy. And if not, that's not Billy's fault either.
Yes any thread with Billy in it is a good time. he brings out emotion in a lot of the guys on here.
|
|
|
Re: per animal charge
[Re: PocketJax]
#1953924
04/15/10 09:40 PM
04/15/10 09:40 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830 Waterford, WI
Nathan Krause
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 830
Waterford, WI
|
Did Billy do something wrong on an episode that I missed...? Well it was mentioned that Billy was busted with a different type of roach but then clarification came in that it was actually his brother Ricky who has a history of drug abuse. You are now up to speed on the adventures of Billy
|
|
|
|
|