Strictly Trapping


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Trading Post
(Please support F&T Trading Post, our sponsor for the Trapping Only Forum)



TrappersPost
Please support Trappers post, a sponsor of the Strictly Trapping Forum



Print Thread
Hop To
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: The Beav] #5219043
10/05/15 09:25 AM
10/05/15 09:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,136
southern ontario canada
C
coonwild Offline
trapper
coonwild  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,136
southern ontario canada
Originally Posted By: The Beav
Hey Boco can you Canuks even use foot holds on dry land any more?


Yes beav we can


Duncan Wildlife control your solution to wildlife problems


my video's: http://www.youtube.com/trappermatt1976

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5219333
10/05/15 03:24 PM
10/05/15 03:24 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
Having used most traps out there, and (like most of us did) starting with the 1.75s for coyotes what is the benefit of using a 1.75..or even a #2 sized trap for coyotes? I have found none, personally.

Some will say "less damage". In theory this "sounds" great. But in reality it is most often times the exact opposite. My 650s casts cause less damage than the 1.75s or 550s do. I've compared them side by side.

Now I know Beav has done some live market trapping with laminated 1.75s. I kinda get that (to some degree). I also know a guy from indiana who live market traps with #3 victor padded jaws (2 coiled). I also understand that. But for fur trapping, I cannot see one advantage to a smaller trap as opposed to a #3 or above for coyotes.

Gas, trucks, and time is spendy. Going cheap on a trap is shooting yourself in the foot...or feet..and head.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5219441
10/05/15 05:37 PM
10/05/15 05:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5219456
10/05/15 06:03 PM
10/05/15 06:03 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



With smaller traps, it takes a bit of expertise to guide the paw to the pan (fencing) vs. having a bigger target and hoping that the paw lands square. I sold all my 1.75/2/3's at the NTA in Marshfield a few years abck as they are obsolete compared to new trap designs. That being said, I don't like working on traps so these were stock models with beefier swivels and chain and night latched but no lamination.

If you're hoping that the animal's paw will land square, use a #78 cool

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5219894
10/05/15 09:54 PM
10/05/15 09:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted By: Bob
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play


Bob - you must have sissy house cats ..lol. 90% of my land are # 3's ..never seen damage!!!


IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5219976
10/05/15 10:30 PM
10/05/15 10:30 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
Originally Posted By: Bob
It's not about damage to the coyote. It's about damage to smaller non target critters. A house cat can't take a #3 like a coyote can. That's where the smaller traps come into play


Theory. I've caught farm cats in the big traps. More damage with the smaller ones by comparison. Of course the particular big trap could be different. Always had more damage in the smaller traps, though. Worse was always the 1.75s.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220061
10/05/15 11:13 PM
10/05/15 11:13 PM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



Smaller trap offer the following advantages;

1. Quicker to set with less bedding required
2. Use less covering such as waxed dirt, etc. means less $$ spent if purchasing covering
3. Easier on the body if you are running dozens of sets every day
4. Less weight in the rig (esp. important in UTV/AtVs.
5. Less weight on the smaller species paw can be beneficial
6. Faster to get into the ground means less human scent left at the set area
7. MUCH easier to use and discuss with land owners in urban America

Just some quick points and there are more. I note also the bigger traps are valuable also and have their place.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220073
10/05/15 11:19 PM
10/05/15 11:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
T
TNcat Offline
trapper
TNcat  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,174
Middle Tennessee
Bottom line for me, I sold all my MB 550's...I Do not like them . That's all I got to say about that smile

Last edited by TNcat; 10/06/15 01:03 PM.

IT'S A SOUTHERN THANG
Y'ALL WOULDN'T UNDERSTAND

NRA member
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220118
10/06/15 12:05 AM
10/06/15 12:05 AM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



I think the take away here is;

Trappers have opinions based on their individual trapping skills and observations in the field. Both of these criteria vary trapper to trapper so trap preference varies trapper to trapper. That's a good thing. Some like Coke and some prefer Pepsi.

There's really no "right" or "wrong" answer. Buy some of several models and see what your style of trapping click with.

I started trapping with jump traps, moved on to Victor #3N, then to Victor #3's, then to Victor #2 (not very long) then to SC 1.75, now MB 550. There were BMI Wolfer and some high end traps (Jakes, Sterling) used in the west but not in Michigan as theft was too severe (10% stolen each year). All have caught coyotes and some are much better than others and some would be better used in rural settings vs. suburban surroundings.

Aren't we fortunate to be able to discuss several brands of traps and several styles as well. That way each of us can find a good "fit".

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220120
10/06/15 12:06 AM
10/06/15 12:06 AM

M
Mark June
Unregistered
Mark June
Unregistered
M



When do we get to figure out the best traps for Lions?

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220504
10/06/15 11:33 AM
10/06/15 11:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,851
Pa
W
Wright Brothers Offline
trapper
Wright Brothers  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,851
Pa
If bigger is more friendly, why then does my state association provide 1 1/2s to the trapper school attendees? Is the whole Association misinformed? lol

So many variables, if on the magic coyote run way yes set big. But, does the newbie asking these questions even know where this location exists?
Experienced guys don't need to ask. I'm not about to suggest new trappers, IN MY AREA IN THE EAST, start big.





Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: ] #5220508
10/06/15 11:36 AM
10/06/15 11:36 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Originally Posted By: Mark June
When do we get to figure out the best traps for Lions?

#1 longspring


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220574
10/06/15 01:10 PM
10/06/15 01:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
Ever caught a kit fox in a #3? It ain't pretty, not a bit. I'm not saying a # 3 isn't more appropriate for coyotes. I'm saying that a lot of the time coyotes aren't all you gotta worry about.

Last edited by Bob; 10/06/15 01:28 PM.

"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220576
10/06/15 01:13 PM
10/06/15 01:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
2cylinder Offline
trapper
2cylinder  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,336
SE MN
Beaver trapper, did you ever decide on a trap?


Rebuilding john deere and international/farmall carburetors
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: Bob] #5220824
10/06/15 05:33 PM
10/06/15 05:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
Originally Posted By: Bob
Ever caught a kit fox in a #3? It ain't pretty, not a bit. I'm not saying a # 3 isn't more appropriate for coyotes. I'm saying that a lot of the time coyotes aren't all you gotta worry about.


It depends on what #3, Bob. Of course they run the spectrum.

I trap in suburbia...with 650 casts because the 550s beat the non targets up too much.

I keep some 2 coil Victor #3 padded jaws for places of extra concern.

Just my experience. To each his own.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220903
10/06/15 06:50 PM
10/06/15 06:50 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,106
Near Gardiner MT
E
Elkguy Offline
trapper
Elkguy  Offline
trapper
E

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,106
Near Gardiner MT
Caught a fox in a 4 1/2 Newhouse a couple years ago. Would have to categorize the damage as "extreme". Guess I didn't have that pan tension quite up to the mandated 10 lbs. Anyway, I wouldn't recommend this type of trap for coyote/fox. smile


CBCS
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5220977
10/06/15 07:32 PM
10/06/15 07:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
B
Bob Offline
trapper
Bob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,960
Northern Nevada
Calvin, I'm talking kit fox, not reds or greys. Out here we have swift fox, they're protected, but nearly the same thing as a kit fox. Where I grew up we had kit fox. I've caught them in fully modified bridger #3s and they cause devastating damage. There is no chance of release when a kit or swift fox is caught in a #3. There's no recovering from that for them, their legs are very fragile.


"I have two guns, one for each of ya."
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221047
10/06/15 08:09 PM
10/06/15 08:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,963
South metro, MN
Point taken, Bob. We Don't have Kit fox here...and really not much of a fox population at all anymore (unfortunately). I do release a couple reds every year, though...after I check their feet as best I can. I Can't find it to kill them anymore. If the coyotes beat me to them in the trap, they tear them in half...literally. A hunk of fox down the hole guarantees a coyote or two there the next day, however.

Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221108
10/06/15 08:48 PM
10/06/15 08:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 36
Hillsboro Ohio
J
Jeffrey D Norris Offline
trapper
Jeffrey D Norris  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 36
Hillsboro Ohio
Guys, I don't think that a half an inch of jaw width is going to gain a whole lot on the catch gain...I think a lot of the strong traps have a greater jaw pressure... Has anyone ever tested the pressure of grip each trap has ??? I like the softcatch trap for a couple reasons... 1st thing is a broken leg will twist off pretty easy (softcatch is a little easier on the leg)... 2nd is I will be trying to sell live this year... and the rubber jaw also has a greater holding area ... I guess there are a lot of choices out there like several have posted... That is my take on trap selection use what catches for you and forget what don't


I caught 1 low down dirty rat
Re: Victor #3 vs. mb-550 vs. Montgomery #3 [Re: beaver trapper] #5221219
10/06/15 10:05 PM
10/06/15 10:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
R
red mt Offline
trapper
red mt  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,081
montana
Lack of Swivels is the cause not the traps , power is not the issue. In 3 traps listed.


Kenneth schoening
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  Drifter, Wolfdog91 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1