No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products



Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3
Topic Options
Hop to:
#6024184 - 10/12/17 01:19 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Finster]
ToTheWoods Offline
trapper

Registered: 12/29/13
Posts: 397
Loc: St. Croix County, Wisconsin
How I read what the NRA was saying when they called for the review was this...
The NRA is stating that under a democratic president the ATF determined that bump stocks were legal for the reasons given above. To counteract the democrats now the NRA asked to go back to the 2010 ruling and review it's legality. This way when the DEM's go after the ban the NRA can say that their party ok'd the legality of the device under current law and why should it NOW be illegal.

Top
#6024233 - 10/12/17 03:02 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Finster]
Steven Trosper Offline
trapper

Registered: 10/27/08
Posts: 248
Loc: Perrysville, IN
Keep in mind, 99.9% of the Republicans, in both the House and Senate, are Democrats with an R after their name.
_________________________
If kids are not brought into trapping; trapping will die of old age.
Remember, Rush Limbaugh is always right.

Top
#6024237 - 10/12/17 03:08 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Steven Trosper]
lebowski Offline
trapper

Registered: 01/03/14
Posts: 1736
Loc: MI
not even one whole republican? LOL

0.999*535=534.46

Bump stocks should be illegal. This thing should pass easily

Originally Posted By: Steven Trosper
Keep in mind, 99.9% of the Republicans, in both the House and Senate, are Democrats with an R after their name.


Edited by lebowski (10/12/17 03:09 PM)
_________________________
“A hunt based only on trophies taken falls far short of what the ultimate goal should be.”

-- Fred Bear

Top
#6024248 - 10/12/17 03:22 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: lebowski]
Lugnut Offline
trapper

Registered: 12/23/06
Posts: 5483
Loc: SEPA
Why should bump-stocks be illegal lebowski?
_________________________
Eh...wot?

Top
#6024249 - 10/12/17 03:26 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: lebowski]
Finster Offline
trapper

Registered: 03/13/13
Posts: 6794
Loc: Fredonia, PA.
Originally Posted By: lebowski
not even one whole republican? LOL

0.999*535=534.46

Bump stocks should be illegal. This thing should pass easily

Originally Posted By: Steven Trosper
Keep in mind, 99.9% of the Republicans, in both the House and Senate, are Democrats with an R after their name.
TROLL
_________________________
Libtards are not for gun control, they are for no guns, then control!

Top
#6024275 - 10/12/17 04:10 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Tweed]
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper

Registered: 09/03/08
Posts: 3502
Loc: NC
Originally Posted By: Tweed
Originally Posted By: bowhunter27295
Just make sure these names and their actions are remembered come primary time.

They got to go!!!



Yeah that's right....bounce someone on a single issue, get a polarizing candidate and watch the Dems win....great strategy there....


So knowing the stance these politicians have taken on this issue, would you feel ok voting for them if the other primary candidate was not for banning bump stocks?

You think it will continue to help to have milquetoast rinos as voting members? How's that working for conservatism now?
_________________________
The world is full of sheep and wolves.

Be the sheepdog.

Top
#6024318 - 10/12/17 05:07 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Finster]
countrygun Offline
trapper

Registered: 04/24/08
Posts: 474
Loc: N. Texas
9 republicans that shouldn't be in office, and hopefully won't come next cycle.

Top
#6024394 - 10/12/17 07:16 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: thrstyunderwater]
Scuba1 Offline
"Euro-Redneck"

Registered: 06/10/07
Posts: 2791
Loc: On a Boat
Originally Posted By: thrstyunderwater
I've never used a bump stock. Are they accurate? Does any sort of law enforcement or military use them?


They don't use them because it puts spray and pray to a new level. Trust me , you do not want LA to use them unless they are in a really big field. Law enforcement and collateral damage are two words that do not go well together.
IMHO those things are a fad like man buns. But that does not mean that I am opposed to people being able to buy them.
This is mainly for selfish reasons. The folks that use them mostly use mil surp ammo .... so I get to pick up a bunch of LC brass with the same date in one pile.


Edited by Scuba1 (10/12/17 07:22 PM)
_________________________
At My Age Everything Comes with a lifetime Guarantee

Top
#6024401 - 10/12/17 07:26 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Lugnut]
AntiGov Offline
trapper

Registered: 01/05/14
Posts: 3481
Loc: Central Oregon
Originally Posted By: Lugnut
Why should bump-stocks be illegal lebowski?


Yeah , give us your reasoning Liblowski
_________________________
Report a post club - Non member



Top
#6024408 - 10/12/17 07:34 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: AntiGov]
Finster Offline
trapper

Registered: 03/13/13
Posts: 6794
Loc: Fredonia, PA.
Originally Posted By: AntiGov
Originally Posted By: Lugnut
Why should bump-stocks be illegal lebowski?


Yeah , give us your reasoning Liblowski
He's a libtard. He does whatever Hitlery and Obummer decide is on the agenda. If they come out and start attacking trapping with the same vigor, he would join PETA the next day. Libtardski is only a drone.
_________________________
Libtards are not for gun control, they are for no guns, then control!

Top
#6024413 - 10/12/17 07:37 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Finster]
AntiGov Offline
trapper

Registered: 01/05/14
Posts: 3481
Loc: Central Oregon
grin
_________________________
Report a post club - Non member



Top
#6024431 - 10/12/17 08:02 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Finster]
Rick Otts Offline
trapper

Registered: 11/08/13
Posts: 903
Loc: Alpine NY
Originally Posted By: Finster
Remember who these RINO's are folks. Sadly, three are in my state! They need to be voted out!

9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control for Law-Abiding Americans

Rep. Carlos Curbelo (R-FL) introduced gun control aimed at law-abiding Americans on Tuesday. His bill has nine Republican co-sponsors, which means nine Republicans are willing to punish every law-abiding American for the behavior of one criminal in Las Vegas.
And they are doing all this to ban bump stocks, a product the ATF evaluated and approved in 2010.
The ATF approved the stocks because they are accessories for semiautomatics rather than conversion devices that turn semiautomatics into fully automatic weapons. Curbelo’s bill gets around the ATF’s approval by explicitly banning certain accessories for AR-15s, even if those accessories “[do] not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machine gun.”
And like the Democrat bill–put forward by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)–Curbelo’s bill is already broader than bump stocks alone. In other words, it is a ban that will keep on giving for the Democrats and other gun control proponents.
Here are the nine Republicans who are co-sponsoring Curbelo’s bill:

Rep. Peter King (R-NY)
Rep. Leonard Lance (R-NJ)
Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-PA)
Rep, Ed Royce (R-CA)
Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ)
Rep. Erik Paulsen (R-MN)
Rep. Ryan Costello (R-PA)
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)
Rep. Charlie Dent (R-PA

The push to ban bump stocks is especially rich in light of the fact that using the devices probably made the Vegas attacker less effective than he would have been without them. After all, bump stocks are made for novelty rather than precision. For this reason, U.S. Army Sergeant First Class special forces soldier Tony Cowden suggests the Vegas attacker could have been deadlier if he had shot slower with a rifle not outfitted with a bump stock
Moreover, the effect one achieves with a bump stock can be achieved with an index finger and a belt-loop; no bump stock device needed. So what will Republican gun controllers do if they ban bump stocks and realize that people are still having fun with their rifles via blue jean belt loops? Will they ban belt loops?
In summary–Bump stocks are accessories, not conversion kits. They are novelties that reduce accuracy by producing a short, rapid-fire effect that can be achieved using nothing more than a finger and belt loop. For these reasons, Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) stresses that bump stock gun control is part of a larger misdirection that creates a “slippery slope” Democrats can exploit for more gun control in the future. Yet Reps. Peter King, Leonard Lance, Patrick Meehan, Ed Royce, Chris Smith, Erik Paulsen, Ryan Costello, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, and Charlie Dent are rallying behind Curbelo’s gun control bill.


Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/10/11/9-republicans-co-sponsoring-more-gun-control-for-law-abiding-americans/
Well they feel they got too do something seeing people died even if it is worthless just like they are.
_________________________
Rick Otts

Top
#6024435 - 10/12/17 08:05 PM Re: 9 Republicans Co-Sponsoring More Gun Control [Re: Rick Otts]
Finster Offline
trapper

Registered: 03/13/13
Posts: 6794
Loc: Fredonia, PA.
Originally Posted By: Rick Otts
Well they feel they got too do something seeing people died even if it is worthless just like they are.
I believe you are half right. They feel that they need to be able to say they tried to do something. As usual, they are not attempting to solve the problem of mental illness. They are just blaming an object.
_________________________
Libtards are not for gun control, they are for no guns, then control!

Top
Page 3 of 3 < 1 2 3