Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Nikolas]
#6233174
05/04/18 11:30 AM
05/04/18 11:30 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 862 western Pennsylvania
ducksnbucks36
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 862
western Pennsylvania
|
I’d take the breach the dam, and then clean it out yourself adding a little structure, and spawning points for fish as well. Fix the dam then add some Minnie’s, and work up from there.
|
|
|
Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Nikolas]
#6233272
05/04/18 02:30 PM
05/04/18 02:30 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,160 B61-12 vicinity, MO
TreedaBlackdog
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,160
B61-12 vicinity, MO
|
I was wrong - it was Michigan - I posted it - makes me chuckle.
Subject: Go Figure
This is a copy of an actual letter sent to Ryan DeVries, from the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, State of Michigan. Wait till you read this guy’s response – but read the entire letter before you get to the response.
Mr. Ryan DeVries 2088 Dagget Pierson, MI 49339 SUBJECT: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20;
Site Location: Montcalm County
Dear Mr. DeVries:
It has come to the attention of the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property. You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor who did the following unauthorized activity:
Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond.
A permit must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity. A review of the Department’s files shows that no permits have been issued.
Therefore, the Department has determined that this activity is in violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws annotated.
The Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially failed during a recent rain event, causing debris and flooding at downstream locations. We find that dams of this nature are inherently hazardous and cannot be permitted.
The Department therefore orders you to cease and desist all activities at this location, and to restore the stream to a free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from the stream channel. All restoration work shall be completed no later than January 31, 2002.
Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff. Failure to comply with this request or any further unauthorized activity on the site may result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement action.
We anticipate and would appreciate your full cooperation in this matter. Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any questions.
Sincerely, David L. Price District Representative Land and Water Management Division
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ RESPONSE: Dear Mr. Price,
Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N; R10W, Sec. 20; Montcalm County
Reference your certified letter dated 12/17/2000 has been referred to me to respond to. First of all, Mr. Ryan De Vries is not the legal landowner and/or contractor at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan.
I am the legal owner and a couple of beavers are in the (State unauthorized) process of constructing and maintaining two wood “debris” dams across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond.
While I did not pay for, authorize, nor supervise their dam project, I think they would be highly offended that you call their skillful use of natural building materials “debris.” I would like to challenge your department to attempt to emulate their dam project any time and/or any place you choose. I believe I can safely state there is no way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam determination and/or their dam work ethic.
As to your request, I do not think the beavers are aware that they must first fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity. My first dam question to you is: (1) Are you trying to discriminate against my Spring Pond Beavers? or, (2) do you require all beavers throughout this State to conform to said dam request?
If you are not discriminating against these particular beavers, through the Freedom of Information Act I request completed copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits that have been issued. Perhaps we will see if there really is a dam violation of P! art 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.3010,1 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws, annotated. I have several concerns. My first concern is aren’t the beavers entitled to legal representation?
The Spring Pond Beavers are financially destitute and are unable to pay for said representation – so the State will have to provide them with a lawyer.
The Department’s dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event causing flooding is proof that this is a natural occurrence, which the Department is required to protect. In other words, we should leave the Spring Pond Beavers alone rather than harrass them and call their dam names. If you want the stream “restored” to a dam free-flow condition – please contact the beavers – but if you are going to arrest them they obviously did not pay any attention to your dam letter (being unable to read English).
In my humble ! opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green and water flows downstream. They have more dam right than I do to live and enjoy Spring Pond. If the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection lives up to its name, it should protect the natural resources (Beavers) and the environment (Beavers’ Dams).
So, as far as the beavers and I are concerned, this dam case can be referred for more elevated enforcement action right now. Why wait until 1/31/2002 The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice then, and there will be no way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass them then.
In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention a real environmental quality (health) problem in the area. It is the bears. Bears are actually defecating in our woods. I definitely believe you should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the beavers alone.
If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step! (The bears are not careful where they dump!)
Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to contact you on your answering machine, I am sending this response to your office via another government organization – the USPS. Maybe, someday, it will get there.
Sincerely, Stephen L. Tvedten The University of Texas at: Austin Office Community Relations/Accounting unit P.O. Box 7367 Austin, TX 78713
O thus be it ever, when free men shall stand; Between their loved homes and the war’s desolation; Blessed with victory and peace, may the heaven’s rescued land; Praise the power that hath made, and preserved us a nation. Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just; And this be our motto,
“In God is our Trust”; And the Star Spangled Banner in triumph shall wave, O’er the land of the free & the home of the brave. (last verse of the National Anthem)
|
|
|
Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Nikolas]
#6233590
05/04/18 10:01 PM
05/04/18 10:01 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,880 Ohio, Old fart to some.
ack
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,880
Ohio, Old fart to some.
|
georgia giant hybrid bluegill. i believe the guy that started them is no longer in business but his son is and is on facebook.
i put a couple hundred in my pond. i have caught several over 13 inches with the biggest right at 13 1/2.
_________
I used to have superpowers… but a therapist took them away.
The voices in my head may not be real, but they have some good ideas!
|
|
|
Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Zim]
#6233594
05/04/18 10:06 PM
05/04/18 10:06 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,523 Wi.
Diggerman
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,523
Wi.
|
Treedablackdog that was funny, been awhile since I saw that. You other guys from PA. MO. KS. MN. IN. OH, IL. and such may want to brush up on Wisconsin law before ya offer advice.
Zim How abouts if it is 1/4 acres or less? Yup no permit.
|
|
|
Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Diggerman]
#6234859
05/06/18 09:20 PM
05/06/18 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,996 Rock Springs, WI
Zim
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,996
Rock Springs, WI
|
Treedablackdog that was funny, been awhile since I saw that. You other guys from PA. MO. KS. MN. IN. OH, IL. and such may want to brush up on Wisconsin law before ya offer advice.
Zim How abouts if it is 1/4 acres or less? Yup no permit. Unless you are disturbing a wetland or placing fill in a floodzone. Zim
|
|
|
Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Nikolas]
#6234888
05/06/18 09:47 PM
05/06/18 09:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,488 james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,488
james bay frontierOnt.
|
I agree with starbits.Ask on a forum where people know what they are talking about,lol.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: Reviving an old pond
[Re: Zim]
#6234901
05/06/18 09:56 PM
05/06/18 09:56 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,165 Central NC
traprjohn
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,165
Central NC
|
First thing to do is to contact your county planning and zoning, conservation office or whatever they call it in Lincoln County. ^ this, look at it as a return on your taxes. Here it is the County Extension Office, part of the Dept of Ag. ALWAYS dig / build a pond with it shallower in the center and deeper around the edges........to allow for silting in...of course the dam end is already set like that. Also, join at least 2 forums by Googling the 1 mentioned and "farm pond owners forum" or the like.
|
|
|
|
|