No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
We are seeing the true liberal colors on display at the confirmation hearings. Hatred, hypocrisy, whining and sniveling, screaming and ranting protesters, holding up the proceedings for over an hour-and-a-half opening day over nothing but lies...
And it's all for nothing, he is going to be confirmed, Democrats can't stop that. Why not just accept it with dignity?
Eh...wot?
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Finster]
#6318417 09/05/1804:34 PM09/05/1804:34 PM
But no conservatives sniffled and cried whined, when they wouldn't let Obama make an appointment..Everyone name calling yadda yadda yadda,,, Just more political crap from the whole lot. No ones draining any swamp just changing the faces of the liars and thieves to the ones play their ball game..
Mac
"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Lugnut]
#6318419 09/05/1804:36 PM09/05/1804:36 PM
We are seeing the true liberal colors on display at the confirmation hearings. Hatred, hypocrisy, whining and sniveling, screaming and ranting protesters, holding up the proceedings for over an hour-and-a-half opening day over nothing but lies...
And it's all for nothing, he is going to be confirmed, Democrats can't stop that. Why not just accept it with dignity?
Yes!
They have already confirmed Dems held meeting to organize this chaos, protesters being paid at sight, and over 77 arrested. They had to remove his wife and kids due to fear of violence!
This is the new Democratic party! If you don't agree? We will make you!
Wow!
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Finster]
#6318420 09/05/1804:37 PM09/05/1804:37 PM
She's a wackado for sure. Kavanaugh has a pretty good record with the 2nd, but I think his record on the 4th out weighs that. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he was the right pick and we'll get burned in the future. Just my opinion, fwiw.
I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Finster]
#6318439 09/05/1804:52 PM09/05/1804:52 PM
I hope you're wrong too Catch. I like the fact that he seems to take the Constitution and it's amendments literally, doesn't consider it a "living document.
He seems okay on 2A so far as my limited research has shown.
In follow-on litigation to D.C. v. Heller, the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the District of Columbia’s ban on possession of most semi-automatic rifles and its registration requirement for all guns in D.C. Judge Kavanaugh dissented (in Heller v. D.C. (2011)).
Here is a copy and paste excerpt from his dissent:
In Heller, the Supreme Court held that handguns – the vast majority of which today are semi-automatic – are constitutionally protected because they have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens. There is no meaningful or persuasive constitutional distinction between semi-automatic handguns and semiautomatic rifles. Semi-automatic rifles, like semi-automatic handguns, have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens for self-defense in the home, hunting, and other lawful uses. Moreover, semiautomatic handguns are used in connection with violent crimes far more than semi-automatic rifles are. It follows from Heller’s protection of semi-automatic handguns that semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally protected and that D.C.’s ban on them is unconstitutional. (By contrast, fully automatic weapons, also known as machine guns, have traditionally been banned and may continue to be banned after Heller.)
D.C.’s registration requirement, which is significantly more stringent than any other federal or state gun law in the United States, is likewise unconstitutional. Heller and later McDonald said that regulations on the sale, possession, or use of guns are permissible if they are within the class of traditional, “longstanding” gun regulations in the United States. Registration of all lawfully possessed guns – as distinct from licensing of gun owners or mandatory recordkeeping by gun sellers – has not traditionally been required in the United States and even today remains highly unusual. Under Heller’s history- and tradition-based test, D.C.’s registration requirement is therefore unconstitutional.
Eh...wot?
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Finster]
#6318451 09/05/1805:14 PM09/05/1805:14 PM
Feinstein is she the one with the flying monkeys or it that Pelosi? I get them mixed up, now Waters has the crack pipe I'm pretty sure! Cali crazy at it's best.
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
Jerry Herbst
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Finster]
#6318460 09/05/1805:23 PM09/05/1805:23 PM
But no conservatives sniffled and cried whined, when they wouldn't let Obama make an appointment..Everyone name calling yadda yadda yadda,,, Just more political crap from the whole lot. No ones draining any swamp just changing the faces of the liars and thieves to the ones play their ball game..
Mac
Walker sure got to you, now you got your hate on for anything Republican, eh?
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Catch22]
#6318490 09/05/1806:16 PM09/05/1806:16 PM
She's a wackado for sure. Kavanaugh has a pretty good record with the 2nd, but I think his record on the 4th out weighs that. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he was the right pick and we'll get burned in the future. Just my opinion, fwiw.
I think this is a important but often overlooked aspect when it comes to "conservative" judge appointments. If you believe (as you should) Conservative appointments have saved the 2nd amendment than you must admit the "liberal" appointments have saved the 4th, neither side has a monopoly as being protectors of the constitution.
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd
[Re: Finster]
#6318499 09/05/1806:32 PM09/05/1806:32 PM