No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd #6318399
09/05/18 04:00 PM
09/05/18 04:00 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,027
Fredonia, PA.
Finster Offline OP
trapper
Finster  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,027
Fredonia, PA.
Good grief, I wish that old crone Feinstein would get tossed out of office.


Last edited by Finster; 09/05/18 04:02 PM.

I BELIEVE IN MY GOD, MY COUNTRY AND IN MYSELF.
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318404
09/05/18 04:11 PM
09/05/18 04:11 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 175
New London Wiscinsin
R
RiverRat Offline
trapper
RiverRat  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 175
New London Wiscinsin
She makes me sick!


If guns kill people, pencils cause spelling mistakes!
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318406
09/05/18 04:18 PM
09/05/18 04:18 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,179
Green Bay, Wisconsin
tlguy Offline
trapper
tlguy  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,179
Green Bay, Wisconsin
How do you reconcile voting for a witch like that?

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318415
09/05/18 04:27 PM
09/05/18 04:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,035
SEPA
L
Lugnut Offline
trapper
Lugnut  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,035
SEPA
We are seeing the true liberal colors on display at the confirmation hearings. Hatred, hypocrisy, whining and sniveling, screaming and ranting protesters, holding up the proceedings for over an hour-and-a-half opening day over nothing but lies...

And it's all for nothing, he is going to be confirmed, Democrats can't stop that. Why not just accept it with dignity?


Eh...wot?

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318417
09/05/18 04:34 PM
09/05/18 04:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,562
La Crosse, WI
Macthediver Offline
trapper
Macthediver  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,562
La Crosse, WI
But no conservatives sniffled and cried whined, when they wouldn't let Obama make an appointment..Everyone name calling yadda yadda yadda,,,
Just more political crap from the whole lot. No ones draining any swamp just changing the faces of the liars and thieves to the ones play their ball game..


Mac


"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Lugnut] #6318419
09/05/18 04:36 PM
09/05/18 04:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,269
Indiana
B
brianmall Offline
trapper
brianmall  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,269
Indiana
Originally Posted By: Lugnut
We are seeing the true liberal colors on display at the confirmation hearings. Hatred, hypocrisy, whining and sniveling, screaming and ranting protesters, holding up the proceedings for over an hour-and-a-half opening day over nothing but lies...

And it's all for nothing, he is going to be confirmed, Democrats can't stop that. Why not just accept it with dignity?


Yes!

They have already confirmed Dems held meeting to organize this chaos, protesters being paid at sight, and over 77 arrested. They had to remove his wife and kids due to fear of violence!

This is the new Democratic party! If you don't agree? We will make you!

Wow!

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318420
09/05/18 04:37 PM
09/05/18 04:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,269
Indiana
B
brianmall Offline
trapper
brianmall  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 11,269
Indiana
And she took the mic without being recognized!

Big no no!

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318422
09/05/18 04:39 PM
09/05/18 04:39 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,928
NY
Canvasback2 Offline
trapper
Canvasback2  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 3,928
NY
When I saw the start of today's session, Feinstein kept closing her eyes; like she could not stay awake.

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318423
09/05/18 04:39 PM
09/05/18 04:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,951
OH
Catch22 Offline
trapper
Catch22  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,951
OH
She's a wackado for sure. Kavanaugh has a pretty good record with the 2nd, but I think his record on the 4th out weighs that. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he was the right pick and we'll get burned in the future. Just my opinion, fwiw.


I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318439
09/05/18 04:52 PM
09/05/18 04:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Probably right. Gonna have to be more creative stashing and transporting dope.


-Goofy-
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318440
09/05/18 04:55 PM
09/05/18 04:55 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,770
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,770
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Was I the only one hoping he said.

It says right there in the constitution, shall not be infringed.

Next question.


Who is John Galt?

You don't rise to the occasion, you fall to the level of your training.

Semper Paratus
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Catch22] #6318447
09/05/18 05:07 PM
09/05/18 05:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,035
SEPA
L
Lugnut Offline
trapper
Lugnut  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 20,035
SEPA
I hope you're wrong too Catch. I like the fact that he seems to take the Constitution and it's amendments literally, doesn't consider it a "living document.

He seems okay on 2A so far as my limited research has shown.

In follow-on litigation to D.C. v. Heller, the D.C. Circuit Court upheld the District of Columbia’s ban on possession of most semi-automatic rifles and its registration requirement for all guns in D.C. Judge Kavanaugh dissented (in Heller v. D.C. (2011)).

Here is a copy and paste excerpt from his dissent:

In Heller, the Supreme Court held that handguns – the vast majority of which today are semi-automatic – are constitutionally protected because they have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens. There is no meaningful or persuasive constitutional distinction between semi-automatic handguns and semiautomatic rifles. Semi-automatic rifles, like semi-automatic handguns, have not traditionally been banned and are in common use by law-abiding citizens for self-defense in the home, hunting, and other lawful uses. Moreover, semiautomatic handguns are used in connection with violent crimes far more than semi-automatic rifles are. It follows from Heller’s protection of semi-automatic handguns that semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally protected and that D.C.’s ban on them is unconstitutional. (By contrast, fully automatic weapons, also known as machine guns, have traditionally been banned and may continue to be banned after Heller.)

D.C.’s registration requirement, which is significantly more stringent than any other federal or state gun law in the United States, is likewise unconstitutional. Heller and later McDonald said that regulations on the sale, possession, or use of guns are permissible if they are within the class of traditional, “longstanding” gun regulations in the United States. Registration of all lawfully possessed guns – as distinct from licensing of gun owners or mandatory recordkeeping by gun sellers – has not traditionally been required in the United States and even today remains highly unusual. Under Heller’s history- and tradition-based test, D.C.’s registration requirement is therefore unconstitutional.





Eh...wot?

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318451
09/05/18 05:14 PM
09/05/18 05:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Law Dog Offline
trapper
Law Dog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Feinstein is she the one with the flying monkeys or it that Pelosi? I get them mixed up, now Waters has the crack pipe I'm pretty sure! crazy Cali crazy at it's best.


Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!

Jerry Herbst
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318460
09/05/18 05:23 PM
09/05/18 05:23 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,770
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,770
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
She just couldn’t understand that semi auto rifles are widely owned and used, for lawful purposes.


Who is John Galt?

You don't rise to the occasion, you fall to the level of your training.

Semper Paratus
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: DelawareRob] #6318461
09/05/18 05:26 PM
09/05/18 05:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 714
michigan
M
mjh Offline
trapper
mjh  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 714
michigan
she is one scary beach

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: DelawareRob] #6318462
09/05/18 05:28 PM
09/05/18 05:28 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,027
Fredonia, PA.
Finster Offline OP
trapper
Finster  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,027
Fredonia, PA.
Originally Posted By: DelawareRob
She just couldn’t understand that semi auto rifles are widely owned and used, for lawful purposes.
Fixed it for you. It's not just guns, she understands nothing but power and money.


I BELIEVE IN MY GOD, MY COUNTRY AND IN MYSELF.
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318465
09/05/18 05:29 PM
09/05/18 05:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,770
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 8,770
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Thanks Finster. That does make a lot more sense.

Not that she makes any.


Who is John Galt?

You don't rise to the occasion, you fall to the level of your training.

Semper Paratus
Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Macthediver] #6318481
09/05/18 05:59 PM
09/05/18 05:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,523
Wi.
D
Diggerman Offline
trapper
Diggerman  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,523
Wi.
Originally Posted By: Macthediver
But no conservatives sniffled and cried whined, when they wouldn't let Obama make an appointment..Everyone name calling yadda yadda yadda,,,
Just more political crap from the whole lot. No ones draining any swamp just changing the faces of the liars and thieves to the ones play their ball game..


Mac
Walker sure got to you, now you got your hate on for anything Republican, eh?

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Catch22] #6318490
09/05/18 06:16 PM
09/05/18 06:16 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,574
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,574
MN
Originally Posted By: Catch22
She's a wackado for sure. Kavanaugh has a pretty good record with the 2nd, but I think his record on the 4th out weighs that. I hope I'm wrong, but I don't think he was the right pick and we'll get burned in the future. Just my opinion, fwiw.

I think this is a important but often overlooked aspect when it comes to "conservative" judge appointments. If you believe (as you should) Conservative appointments have saved the 2nd amendment than you must admit the "liberal" appointments have saved the 4th, neither side has a monopoly as being protectors of the constitution.

Re: Brett Kavanaugh's view on the 2nd [Re: Finster] #6318499
09/05/18 06:32 PM
09/05/18 06:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,866
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Online content
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Online Content
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,866
williamsburg ks
never said the second was pretty plain language. instead said he had to follow precedent.

he didn't have a problem saying full auto isn't protected. just another ban freedom cause its to scary type imo.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread