That's a common misunderstanding. The Alaska building code applies throughout the state. There's just no enforcement outside cities.

You might have a problem if you try to sell a non-code-compliant home.

Jim

Not a misunderstanding at all Jim. I’m a contractor. There is absolutely no state legal requirement to build to any code or standard. The reason it’s an issue when selling is that banks don’t want to loan on a sub-standard asset. But even in that case, banks usually just hire a visual inspector who has no idea about the hidden structural elements, and if he passes it the bank usually will. Selling a sub-code dwelling is still possible, either to a cash buyer or “as-is” for a reduced appraisal. Meeting and documenting code compliance makes the selling process much easier (not to mention it’s just a good idea), but again there’s no legal relevance to the state.

No deaths, very few if any real injuries. Some impressive infrastructure damage, and a bit of structural. The seismic building codes that were developed after 64 proved their worth, and altogether we came out pretty well.

Anchorage has stricter building codes than the state generally, particularly as to earthquake protection.

Anchorage also has code enforcement, unlike most rural areas.

Jim

"The International Building Code (I.B.C.), Chapters 1 - 12, 14 - 28, and 30 - 35, and Appendix C (2006 Edition) are adopted by reference to regulate all occupancies and buildings with the following revisions:"

13 AAC 50.020

Jim