No offense taken. Fair enough question. Honestly lately I've just haven't been as talkative honestly. I read all the responses for the most part and really enjoy them but lately in general unless someone asks for me or something I just kinda lurk.and read. I really do enjoy reading whatalot of y'all write

And as far as other people's stuff, again I do read a good many posts,I lurk on the fall coyotes chat alot but either I don't feel I have anything really worth inputting( sorry but after being told mutiple times I shouldn't say anything because I don't catch anything figured I'd be best if I kept my yap shut)or the topic just isn't something I'm interested in. Theirs also been some personal things but let's not get into that.

If that was a rule Wolf (not saying anything cause you didn't catch much)lots of people would be kicked off here lol.
I read all your posts.

I was googling them, says not reslly a battle rifle, not lot energy, from my experience , the sks was well built, simple an reliable but chesp soft wood, they didn't have a long range. We're they used in Viet Nam much? Us weapons or m16, at rifle or whatever is 5.56 round? Smaller bullet but lot more velocity, range an more accurate. Ammo was cheap when I got sks. Bought at hardware store for $70 , just after they banned the bayonet, sold it few years back. No use for it ever