Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544619
05/27/19 12:23 AM
05/27/19 12:23 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,674 OK
Aaron Proffitt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,674
OK
|
Carried both. M14 EBR and M4. Both great rifles, especially today's rifles. Back when M16 first debuted and probably until this latest version came out , I'm not sure I would've given any M16 model a nod.
M14 is a heck of a battle rifle. Reason it's still in use.
Honor a Soldier. Be the kind of American worth fighting for.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: The Beav]
#6544625
05/27/19 12:55 AM
05/27/19 12:55 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,861 Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,861
Amite county Mississippi
|
The accuracy thing has long passed In the military. Now It's shoot as many rounds as fast as you can and hope you hit something. Back In the day of the M1 Garand we were taught accuracy not spray and hope. I'd have to dis agree with this.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544646
05/27/19 05:09 AM
05/27/19 05:09 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,833 Wisconsin
The Beav
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 23,833
Wisconsin
|
You can disagree all you want but accuracy still tops the list In my opinion. The way things are depicted In todays fire fights you would be out of ammo In a half an hour.
The forum Know It All according to Muskrat
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544720
05/27/19 09:00 AM
05/27/19 09:00 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 153 N E,Ohio
ohiosnareman
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 153
N E,Ohio
|
The basic training brigade I was in was the first to use the M-14 at Fort Knox . One of the extra duties we did there was collect truck loads of M 1's and load them on box cars to be decommissioned . Did the same thing when I was at Fort Belvior . I can still remember those piles of M-1's stacked in those rail cars . We got brand new M-14's at Fort Knox . One of many reasons I liked them was they are more left hand friendly .
old and tested
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: The Beav]
#6544735
05/27/19 09:13 AM
05/27/19 09:13 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,390 SD
Boone Liane
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,390
SD
|
You can disagree all you want but accuracy still tops the list In my opinion. The way things are depicted In todays fire fights you would be out of ammo In a half an hour.
Stop watching movies.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: Maddog47]
#6544765
05/27/19 09:45 AM
05/27/19 09:45 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 14,310 Montana
USMC47 🦫
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 14,310
Montana
|
The accuracy thing has long passed In the military. Now It's shoot as many rounds as fast as you can and hope you hit something. Back In the day of the M1 Garand we were taught accuracy not spray and hope. Neav, believe me, we’re still doing the accuracy thing. We carried the M-14 when I went over in March of 66. The 16's came in about half way through my tour. We kept the 14. 100% dependable. Very accurate and it took a beating. Many negative issues with the 16 and a lot of horror stories. Not the 14. 14's were heavier andyou carried a few less mags but we loved it. Bur then we Marines always seemed to get the good things last. lol General, we STILL get the good things last. Lol.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544775
05/27/19 09:58 AM
05/27/19 09:58 AM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,898 michigan,USA
seniortrap
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,898
michigan,USA
|
My question is, "Why do they accurize an M14/M21 and use it in the Olympics?
My brother-in-law shot for the Army in the competition with an M21. He was deadly with the 1911 he used also.
To go duck hunting with him on a marsh wasn't fair to those of us.
Vietnam--1967 46th. Const./Combat Engineers
"Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction." "After the first shot, all plans go out the window!"
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: The Beav]
#6544831
05/27/19 10:52 AM
05/27/19 10:52 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,674 OK
Aaron Proffitt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,674
OK
|
You can disagree all you want but accuracy still tops the list In my opinion. The way things are depicted In todays fire fights you would be out of ammo In a half an hour.
Volume and sustained high rates of fire have always had a place in military doctrine interspersed with accurate rifle fire . Very little of rifle use involves burst or auto . Almost none really. So whatever point you thought you were making , it was done in error.
Honor a Soldier. Be the kind of American worth fighting for.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544896
05/27/19 12:12 PM
05/27/19 12:12 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,491 james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,491
james bay frontierOnt.
|
Military snipers continue to push the envelope today.Records are broken every couple years.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: The Beav]
#6544923
05/27/19 12:52 PM
05/27/19 12:52 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,861 Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 11,861
Amite county Mississippi
|
You can disagree all you want but accuracy still tops the list In my opinion. The way things are depicted In todays fire fights you would be out of ammo In a half an hour.
No I'm not saying accuracy isn't. What I'm saying is accuracy is still taught and ROE have gotten so crazy that the whole spray and pray deal is pretty user unfreindly.
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544931
05/27/19 01:02 PM
05/27/19 01:02 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872 Central, SD
Law Dog
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
|
A lot of the early M-16 problems came from pencil pushers that though they knew better then Eugene Stoner did about gun design, the biggest flaw was removing the chrome lining from the original design then sending that design to a wet environment.
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
Jerry Herbst
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6544935
05/27/19 01:05 PM
05/27/19 01:05 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 691 Saltlake city utah
Steelflight
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 691
Saltlake city utah
|
That was with the are they carry now. The m14 was soon reintroduced after that. Not a vet here. However my two cents on the caliber is this. The heavier round and if I recall longer length led to much better sectional drnsity. Which leads to better b.c. that being said. The m14 has its place as a very accurate battle rifle. For starters good luck jamming the bugger. However I would like it more if it was a 30-06
Still extremely accurate putting a very heavy bullet down range. The other .22 call bullet is so deadly because it ricochets off every bone it hits. Unless its a solid face to face hit.
My civilian .02cents
You may think before you act. The question is did you listen to your own council?
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6545047
05/27/19 04:46 PM
05/27/19 04:46 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,898 michigan,USA
seniortrap
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,898
michigan,USA
|
Actual field experience proves out the arm chair experts.
Vietnam--1967 46th. Const./Combat Engineers
"Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction." "After the first shot, all plans go out the window!"
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: seniortrap]
#6546147
05/29/19 04:31 PM
05/29/19 04:31 PM
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,898 michigan,USA
seniortrap
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,898
michigan,USA
|
It was Army military Olympics he shot in. It may have been at Camp Perry.
I can't ask him because he has since passed.
Vietnam--1967 46th. Const./Combat Engineers
"Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction." "After the first shot, all plans go out the window!"
|
|
|
Re: The M14 was a terrible design!?!
[Re: Maddog47]
#6546164
05/29/19 05:21 PM
05/29/19 05:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 17,851 MN
160user
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 17,851
MN
|
We carried the M-14 when I went over in March of 66. The 16's came in about half way through my tour. We kept the 14. 100% dependable. Very accurate and it took a beating. Many negative issues with the 16 and a lot of horror stories. Not the 14. 14's were heavier andyou carried a few less mags but we loved it. Bur then we Marines always seemed to get the good things last. lol Spot on old man! The M-14 is a heck of a rifle. The original M-16A1 did not have a forward bolt assist and many good men died with the M-16 broke open trying to clear a jam or get the bolt to lock up into battery. I have an M-1A and love it. The "overdrive" switch would be fun but after shooting a couple of lighter recoiling full auto's I can't see where it would be controllable. I did get to shoot a grease gun and an M2 carbine and they were a HOOT to play with.
I have nothing clever to put here.
|
|
|
|
|