Some of them are high lock levers but most of them are low lock. I'd like to get some otter this year. Will these hold if swivled up?

Hardest part of catching an otter by the foot is trap placement. Their random slithery ways makes it hard to know where that sweet spot is. I have caught and held them in unmodified 1 3/4 Victors with the factory offset jaws. I caught one by three toes in a 1 1/2 without offset by three toes. Their toes are held on pretty tight to their feet apparently. Why are you using footholds for otter? Just curious, not judging.

I have a few conis as well but I want to put foot holds beside the conis for the otter that go around and maybe a few pocket sets. I already have the vics so I thought I'd add them to the sets of they will hold.

They'll do just fine.I wouldn't worry about.Personally,I don't think a otter is hard to hold in a foothold.When they did restocking from one state to another No.11's were used.I've caught them in 11/2 coils up to 14 jumps.

You just have to get that otter walking and It won't be a problem.

I cant see why not?

You mean like putting something down for them to have to step over? Pokey sticks?

They are pretty flimsy trap. The low locking lever ones especially. They are good on mink and rats but I know nothing about otter other than they fight like the dickens lol! That's why I'm asking.

imho they would be my last choice,and if I did they would be on drowner wires. #11 are strong holding traps! been a lot of critters meet the demise from tiny little 11s. If I was forced to use that size trap the blake and lambs are better then the vics

You must be talking about the old Blake and Lambs,because there's no difference between the two today.Their all made by the same company.

That's what I'm talking about Buck. The old Victor/Blake and Lamb square jaw traps.

Make sure the otter cant get ahold of anything to pull on. Springs need to be strong on the trap.

Most would be surprised at the otters caught on dry land in footholds. I've lost count over the years, but I set dry for them as much as I do in water......or back when the otter market was good I did...

Interesting ...I have never seen Blake and Lamb #3 square jaw trap like the #3 Victor square jaw trap. I have 4 doz #3 Victor .. I swapped the low levers over to high levers ..I modified with jc Conner rubber pads ,4 coiled and baseplate because I get the metal free ,,I made a jig to bend .
Caught plenty of coyote..my favorite bobcat trap.

I thought he meant the No.11's

I’m assuming he’s talking about the #3 not #2 square jaws Victor . I don’t know if Victor made #2 in high lever square jaws

TnCat,
Did you replace levers with Bridger levers? I have 20 or so you I’m playing around with.

Sorry for the confusion. I am talking about the old #2 square jaw traps. I have a bunch of the blake and lamb's as well as victors. They appear to be the same trap and I do indeed have some high lever ones that are victors. I also have some #3s that are a much stronger trap.

No ...I used #3 Victor levers

the old square high jaws vic no2 are the ones im referring to they was intended for fox back in the day. Blake and lamb made one that style as well but the frames are heavier I remove a spring and lever to use them as muskrat traps with hagz brackets they pair up perfect in the pic is the blake and lamb im referring too.

That's the trap I've got Tony. I didn't hold out much hope for the low lever ones but I thought the high lever ones might do the trick...