No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588296
08/05/19 07:52 AM
08/05/19 07:52 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,358
MT
S
snowy Offline
trapper
snowy  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,358
MT
^ true.
Fed Gov subsidies oil/gas and electric generation through out the US. Almost everything that is a necessity for life is subsidies including the farmer. There again the towers may never pay for it worth but does add the cause, is really no different then subsidies the oil/gas companies and that industry.

Last edited by snowy; 08/05/19 07:53 AM.

Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588299
08/05/19 08:00 AM
08/05/19 08:00 AM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,341
Firth, Nebraska
jabNE Offline
trapper
jabNE  Offline
trapper

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,341
Firth, Nebraska
There is the loss of landscape view. But am wondering what impact is to wildlife. Most of the farms I see these put up on say in Iowa for instance, do you still see deer, or trap anything around these things? What do the easements do to access of the property?
Just curious...
Jim


Money cannot buy you happiness, but it can buy you a trapping license and that's pretty close.
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588318
08/05/19 08:40 AM
08/05/19 08:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,912
Oakland, MS
Drifter Offline
trapper
Drifter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,912
Oakland, MS
Never been a fan of the wind turbines even from day 1. They eat too much space up for too little return. They are making them bigger every time they put them up it seems. That helps to make the recently put up obsolete quicker. Once obsolete the production of spare parts dries up. The old towers can't be reused as they can't support the newer bigger units.

Thorium salt reactors seems to be the most promising and can even be fueled with the spent fuel of the current plants. That sounds like a win win deal to me. They can even be made mobile. By design no way to have a run away either.


Some individuals use statistics as a drunk man uses lamp-posts — for support rather than for illumination.

Andrew Lang (1844-1912) Scottish poet, novelist and literary critic









Life member NTA , and GA Trappers assoc .
Re: Wind energy [Re: snowy] #6588328
08/05/19 08:54 AM
08/05/19 08:54 AM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
B
Bob_Iowa Offline
trapper
Bob_Iowa  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa

Those wind generation companies pay a lot of taxes to state and county/townships they are sitting on. The windfall is huge to those small communities. The landowner is paid yearly/monthly for the rent of the land and roads etc..

I'm not saying I'm for wind or solar energy just pointing that out. [/quote]

One probelm at least here in Iowa they gave most of them have around 20 year tax abatements thanks to our supervisors. crazy

Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588329
08/05/19 08:57 AM
08/05/19 08:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
B
Bob_Iowa Offline
trapper
Bob_Iowa  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
Gary, I’m surprised that they are burying them they said the ones here when they come down they take and grind them for reuse of the fiberglass.

Re: Wind energy [Re: Bob_Iowa] #6588344
08/05/19 09:19 AM
08/05/19 09:19 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,093
Hathaway Montana
Cathouse Jim Offline
trapper
Cathouse Jim  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,093
Hathaway Montana
Originally Posted by Bob_Iowa

Those wind generation companies pay a lot of taxes to state and county/townships they are sitting on. The windfall is huge to those small communities.


Those taxes are not going to amount to a hill of beans for the loss of 320 plus jobs here. Local businesses, the schools need people, when they start feeling the pinch in loss even more jobs will be at risk.


"I've reached nearly fifty four years of age with my system."

NTA Life member
MTA Life member
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588351
08/05/19 09:37 AM
08/05/19 09:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,808
WI
H
handitrapper Offline
trapper
handitrapper  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,808
WI
When the wind turbine wears out and taken down. Are they being replaced with new ones on the same location? If not. What happens to the foundation? Surely they are quite deep in the ground? Had a updated transmission line near my place about 8 years ago. Those footings each pole are 11’ diameter and 48’ deep. Solid concrete and rebar cage structures.

Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588360
08/05/19 09:58 AM
08/05/19 09:58 AM
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,712
NW Mo
M
Michael Lippold Offline
trapper
Michael Lippold  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,712
NW Mo
Our county was littered with these a few years ago. My personally opinion is there Loud and ugly. The only benefit I have seen so far is I can look up and which way to play the wind for setting traps. These turbines truly divided our community. They put approximately 100 towers up with 3 or 4 big farmers/land owners getting atleast 1/4 of them. I agree that it’s brought a lot of tax dollars to the county but with it all being government subsidized that’s kind of silly, like taking money from one hand and putting it in the other. And to the best of my knowledge no one around here gets any money if they don’t have a tower or the power lines running through them

Re: Wind energy [Re: Bob_Iowa] #6588605
08/05/19 04:32 PM
08/05/19 04:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21,694
Sandhills Nebraska
G
Gary Benson Offline
trapper
Gary Benson  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21,694
Sandhills Nebraska
Originally Posted by Bob_Iowa
Gary, I’m surprised that they are burying them they said the ones here when they come down they take and grind them for reuse of the fiberglass.

I've never heard of recycling fiberglass. Supposedly these are buried because they are not recyclable.


Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588628
08/05/19 04:59 PM
08/05/19 04:59 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,897
michigan,USA
S
seniortrap Offline
trapper
seniortrap  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,897
michigan,USA
Quote
Edp: would like to see if they survive without federal subsidies
.

I have asked this question al around. I know one man who has asked this from our state reps and got not one answer back.

Liars incarnate!


Vietnam--1967 46th. Const./Combat Engineers

"Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction."
"After the first shot, all plans go out the window!"
Re: Wind energy [Re: star flakes] #6588634
08/05/19 05:09 PM
08/05/19 05:09 PM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,951
OH
Catch22 Offline
trapper
Catch22  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,951
OH
Originally Posted by star flakes
Wind and solar both are subsidized. It is why the Europeans owned a large portion of this "green" looting of America in the Obama years. For the facts, I was told that our rural electric was mandated to purchase 40% green energy from Obama regulations, which are still on the books, and is why all of our energy prices have tripled and will keep rising.
If people would raise enough protest about this, in shutting off subsidies, and demanding that the 40% be removed, it would release funds for maintaining coal and progress to thorium. For those who are not aware, America had working thorium power plants in the 1960's. Richard Nixon shut it down, because America needed nuclear weapons from nuclear plants.
Thorium is clean nuclear power, the earth has billions of tons of it, and the United States is loaded with it by God's good Grace. We could power the world literally.

Wind power requires a great deal of cost maintenance. It is the worst of the green energies, as costs are overwhelming. I have read stories that Europe is dumping their wind power and trying to unload it on Africa.

American energy policy is controlled by the insiders. Our natural gas is being used to run power plants in the east, which is driving up our home heating costs. States like Minnesota are insane in getting rid of all energy production, and expecting North and South Dakota to generate coal electricity for them. That is liberalism. North Dakota has stated that they are at max in green energy as it is not dependable. You can not power a grid with a system where the wind does not blow half the year, and the sun is not in they sky for half the day.

Very interesting, I've never heard of Thorium before.


I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
Re: Wind energy [Re: handitrapper] #6588665
08/05/19 06:05 PM
08/05/19 06:05 PM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,314
Custer SD
A
arcticotter Offline
trapper
arcticotter  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,314
Custer SD
Originally Posted by handitrapper
When the wind turbine wears out and taken down. Are they being replaced with new ones on the same location? If not. What happens to the foundation? Surely they are quite deep in the ground? Had a updated transmission line near my place about 8 years ago. Those footings each pole are 11’ diameter and 48’ deep. Solid concrete and rebar cage structures.


They told us that when they break down nothing is done. They are left standing.

Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588691
08/05/19 06:56 PM
08/05/19 06:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,093
Hathaway Montana
Cathouse Jim Offline
trapper
Cathouse Jim  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,093
Hathaway Montana
I can't back this for a fact but I stumbled upon it reading about the disposal of old turbine blades at the City Landfill at Casper Wyoming.

Wind farms don't stop mining
A Single 3MW Wind Turbine Needs:
335 tons of steel,
4.7 tons of copper,
1,200 tons of concrete (cement & aggregates),
3 tons of aluminum,
2 tons of rare earth elements including Zinc, Molybdenum, Nickel, Cobalt, Platinum.


"I've reached nearly fifty four years of age with my system."

NTA Life member
MTA Life member
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588708
08/05/19 07:31 PM
08/05/19 07:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 187
Mass.
T
Trapper Don Offline
trapper
Trapper Don  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 187
Mass.
There is no “thorium reactor.” There is a proposal to use thorium as a fuel in various reactor designs including light-water reactors–as well as fast breeder reactors.You still need uranium – or even plutonium - in a reactor using thorium. Thorium is not a fissile material and cannot either start or sustain a chain reaction. Therefore, a reactor using thorium would also need either enriched uranium or plutonium to initiate the chain reaction and sustain it until enough of the thorium has converted to fissile uranium (U-233) to sustain it.Using plutonium sets up proliferation risks. To make a "thorium reactor" work, one must (a) mix the thorium with plutonium that has been stripped of the highly radioactive fission products; (b) use the mixed-oxide thorium-plutonium fuel in a reactor, whereby the plutonium atoms fission and produce power while the thorium atoms absorb neutrons and are turned into uranium-233 (a man-made isotope of uranium that has never existed in nature); (c) strip the fission products from the uranium-233 and mix THAT with thorium in order to continue the "cycle". In this phase, the U-233 atoms fission and produce power while the thorium atoms absorb neutrons and generate MORE uranium-233. And so the cycle continues, generating more and more fission product wastes.

Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588713
08/05/19 07:39 PM
08/05/19 07:39 PM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
B
Bob_Iowa Offline
trapper
Bob_Iowa  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
They said they can grind them and use the fiberglass in other products, and possibly cement, but that doesn’t mean the guy didn’t lie to me.

Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588717
08/05/19 07:44 PM
08/05/19 07:44 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,830
St. Cloud, MN
trapperkeck Offline
trapper
trapperkeck  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,830
St. Cloud, MN
See, this is where I miss BuckNE.


"The voice of reason!"
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588722
08/05/19 07:47 PM
08/05/19 07:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,093
Hathaway Montana
Cathouse Jim Offline
trapper
Cathouse Jim  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,093
Hathaway Montana
Bob_Iowa - According to the City of Casper, they are nonrecyclable.
Here is a link for you

https://www.casperwy.gov/news/news/city_newsroom/wind_turbine_disposal


"I've reached nearly fifty four years of age with my system."

NTA Life member
MTA Life member
Re: Wind energy [Re: nate] #6588735
08/05/19 07:55 PM
08/05/19 07:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
B
Bob_Iowa Offline
trapper
Bob_Iowa  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 3,626
North central Iowa
Well I guess the guy did lie to me, thank you the link, and now I can say I learned two things today.

Re: Wind energy [Re: EdP] #6588744
08/05/19 08:15 PM
08/05/19 08:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17,736
Central Oregon
AntiGov Offline
trapper
AntiGov  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17,736
Central Oregon
Originally Posted by EdP
I would like to see if they survive without federal subsidies.






X2


Report a post club - Non member


Re: Wind energy [Re: trapperkeck] #6588764
08/05/19 08:42 PM
08/05/19 08:42 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,167
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,167
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by trapperkeck
See, this is where I miss BuckNE.


Definitely ! But there was someone else on here in the same line of work as Buck !


Mean As Nails
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread