What if you have 75 percent poor locations for one reason or another? Your results and conclusions are subject to the effects of your own decisions, which may or may not be understood by the investigator. IE you stink at picking spots and blame the lure for lack of success.

Keep track of what you're using at each set, its location, the weather conditions, the length of time before/between a catch, and so on. At the end of the season, collate that information into a spreadsheet and start playing with the numbers. Do this season after season, and you'll start to get a picture of what works, when and where; patterns will emerge regarding bait/lure combinations and set selection. And you might just discover some things you never anticipated - that's the fun part.

Don't think you can just rely on your memory to analyze what worked and didn't work. Most people are not that gifted. Besides, we tend to be our own worst enemies in this regard; subjective biases and the human capacity for self-deception too easily distort the bigger picture. We're just not naturally attuned to looking at the things in such broader terms.

I have a different method. I just use one bait & one type of urine. I generally carry a second type of bait and some lure. Sometimes my fresh set after a catch will get something different if I feel it is needed, mostly not needed. It is location location location,

Great lure one of my go to but has anyone noticed a difference in these lures from say the early 2000s to today’s stuff? Might be just me....