No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601843
08/24/19 07:58 AM
08/24/19 07:58 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,897
michigan,USA
S
seniortrap Offline
trapper
seniortrap  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5,897
michigan,USA
As far as Impeachment goes, its a process. (A claim by a party of wrong doing) They jump up and down claiming everything, but must prove it.

If said person is found to be GUILTY, then your removed.

And Ginsburg surely isn't being very affective when sleeping on the job.

Last edited by seniortrap; 08/24/19 08:00 AM.

Vietnam--1967 46th. Const./Combat Engineers

"Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction."
"After the first shot, all plans go out the window!"
Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601856
08/24/19 08:23 AM
08/24/19 08:23 AM
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,076
Maine
M
mainer Offline
trapper
mainer  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,076
Maine
The Democrats have given Trump so many political gifts already. Beginning impeachment proceedings during this campaign season would hand Trump a second term with a bright shinny bow. The Democrats lost any chance for impeachment when the Mueller investigation crashed and burned. That scenario is just not going to happen.

If you want something to worry about, worry about the economy and complacency within the conservative base.


"...in a very few days we succeeded in taking over one hundred beaver, the skins of which were worth ten dollars per pound."
Jim Beckwourth (1856)
Re: Ginsburg [Re: mainer] #6601878
08/24/19 09:04 AM
08/24/19 09:04 AM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,478
PA
M
Marathon Offline
trapper
Marathon  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1,478
PA
Maybe she really loves her job. If trapping was my job, I wouldn’t retire even if I was old ad senile. With today’s fur prices, however, I’d be eating a lot of ‘possum stew.

Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601902
08/24/19 09:48 AM
08/24/19 09:48 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,359
MT
S
snowy Offline
trapper
snowy  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,359
MT
Her job must mean a lot to her. The one thing she can't be fired, she works when she wants too, she has NO boss, gets paid and compensated very well, so why would you stop having that title. LOL


Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601917
08/24/19 10:02 AM
08/24/19 10:02 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,985
South Dakota
R
Rat Masterson Offline
trapper
Rat Masterson  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,985
South Dakota
If you can't do your job 100% in Government you should be replaced, why should the tax payers be on the hook for that.

Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601925
08/24/19 10:13 AM
08/24/19 10:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,577
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,577
Georgia
Actually she can be removed. It's spelled out in our operators manual, the Constitution.

All judges serve during periods of "good behavior" and can be removed by Congress via impeachment. Good behavior is a far lower bar to meet than high crimes and misdemeanors.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ginsburg [Re: Law Dog] #6601931
08/24/19 10:22 AM
08/24/19 10:22 AM
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 4,100
Bonner County, Idaho
Wild_Idaho Offline
trapper
Wild_Idaho  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 4,100
Bonner County, Idaho
Originally Posted by Law Dog
They will stuff her if they can get away with it and put strings on her to look alive rather then let Trump appoint the next one.


Aren't most of those far left-leaning crazies puppets?


Real name Eric
The sharpest hammer in the box of crayons.

Re: Ginsburg [Re: warrior] #6601934
08/24/19 10:26 AM
08/24/19 10:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,359
MT
S
snowy Offline
trapper
snowy  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,359
MT
Originally Posted by warrior
Actually she can be removed. It's spelled out in our operators manual, the Constitution.

All judges serve during periods of "good behavior" and can be removed by Congress via impeachment. Good behavior is a far lower bar to meet than high crimes and misdemeanors.

There maybe a rule like that, but try to prove she isn't doing her job!!! That is a war you won't win so that is why that doesn't happen. LOL


Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601947
08/24/19 10:39 AM
08/24/19 10:39 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,577
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,577
Georgia

Here's a list of federal judges that were impeached. Note, not all were indcted and removed from office nor is it a rare occurence in our history. One sitting supreme court justice is on this list, a notable one at that.



John Pickering, U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 1803, on charges of mental instability and intoxication on the bench; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office on March 12, 1804.

Samuel Chase, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 12, 1804, on charges of arbitrary and oppressive conduct of trials; Acquitted by the U.S. Senate on March 1, 1805.

James H. Peck, U.S. District Court for the District of Missouri. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on April 24, 1830, on charges of abuse of the contempt power; Acquitted by the U.S. Senate on January 31, 1831.

West H. Humphreys, U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, May 6, 1862, on charges of refusing to hold court and waging war against the U.S. government; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, June 26, 1862.

Mark W. Delahay, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, February 28, 1873, on charges of intoxication on the bench; Resigned from office, December 12, 1873, before opening of trial in the U.S. Senate.

Charles Swayne, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, December 13, 1904, on charges of abuse of contempt power and other misuses of office; Acquitted by the U.S. Senate February 27, 1905.

Robert W. Archbald, Commerce Court and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, July 11, 1912, on charges of improper business relationship with litigants; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, January 13, 1913.

George W. English, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, April 1, 1926, on charges of abuse of power; Resigned from office November 4, 1926; Senate Court of Impeachment adjourned to December 13, 1926, when, on request of the House manager, impeachment proceedings were dismissed.

Harold Louderback, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, February 24, 1933, on charges of favoritism in the appointment of bankruptcy receivers; Acquitted by the U.S. Senate on May 24, 1933.

Halsted L. Ritter, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, March 2, 1936, on charges of favoritism in the appointment of bankruptcy receivers and practicing law while sitting as a judge; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, April 17, 1936.

Harry E. Claiborne, U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, July 22, 1986, on charges of income tax evasion and of remaining on the bench following criminal conviction; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, October 9, 1986.

Alcee L. Hastings, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, August 3, 1988, on charges of perjury and conspiring to solicit a bribe; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, October 20, 1989.

Walter L. Nixon, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, May 10, 1989, on charges of perjury before a federal grand jury; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, November 3, 1989.

Samuel B. Kent, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, June 19, 2009, on charges of sexual assault, obstructing and impeding an official proceeding, and making false and misleading statements; Resigned from office, June 30, 2009. On July 20, 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives agreed to a resolution not to pursue further the articles of impeachment, and on July 22, 2009, the Senate, sitting as a court of impeachment, dismissed the articles.

G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. 
Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, March 11, 2010, on charges of accepting bribes and making false statements under penalty of perjury; Convicted by the U.S. Senate and removed from office, December 8, 2010.
 


[Linked Image]
Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6601963
08/24/19 11:22 AM
08/24/19 11:22 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,359
MT
S
snowy Offline
trapper
snowy  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 10,359
MT
Not much for teeth in any of those. In this case NO crimes etc.. but talking about not doing her job. You try to impeach someone and proving they aren't doing their job is almost impossible, and without a lawsuit that they will win.


Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
Re: Ginsburg [Re: Rat Masterson] #6601976
08/24/19 11:39 AM
08/24/19 11:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,951
OH
Catch22 Offline
trapper
Catch22  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 16,951
OH
Originally Posted by Rat Masterson
If you can't do your job 100% in Government you should be replaced, why should the tax payers be on the hook for that.

But we are on the hook. There is nothing that can be done. She can be debilitated and not be able to perform her duties and stay on without repercussions. The other Justices can vote not to take up cases if they want to wait her out, that's about it. Look up Justice William Douglas.


I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
Re: Ginsburg [Re: Catch22] #6602002
08/24/19 12:22 PM
08/24/19 12:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,167
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,167
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by Catch22
Originally Posted by Rat Masterson
If you can't do your job 100% in Government you should be replaced, why should the tax payers be on the hook for that.

But we are on the hook. There is nothing that can be done. She can be debilitated and not be able to perform her duties and stay on without repercussions. The other Justices can vote not to take up cases if they want to wait her out, that's about it. Look up Justice William Douglas.



Also, I am sure that her clerks do all the research and write all her opinions. She just signs at the bottom and votes. Her clerks all know which way she will vote on every issue so what we have are people doing her job that were never confirmed by the Senate


Mean As Nails
Re: Ginsburg [Re: rex123] #6602063
08/24/19 01:52 PM
08/24/19 01:52 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,414
Idaho Falls, Idaho
F
Furvor Offline
trapper
Furvor  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,414
Idaho Falls, Idaho
Retire??? What would she do? Unlikely she has any other interests. Still needs taxpayers to cover medical costs.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread