Re: Profound paragraph from 1931
[Re: KeithC]
#6609644
09/04/19 05:30 PM
09/04/19 05:30 PM
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
People receiving welfare need to have to pay for what they get, through their labor or by giving up their reproductive rights, or our country is doomed.
We can not go on helping the worst people in our society to produce more people just like them. It's not right to enslave working Americans to those who won't or can't work. It's also not sustainable to keep breeding progressively more non productive human beings, who take resources from those who earned them. Soon there will be more failures then decent human beings.
Keith Just because the parent/parents ain't worth two cents, it doesn't mean the children will be the same. That's Margaret Sanger thought and in no way is it right. Now to stop paying people for having babies or providing an "out" for poor reproductive behavior is perfectly acceptable, IMO.
|
|
|
Re: Profound paragraph from 1931
[Re: ]
#6609649
09/04/19 05:49 PM
09/04/19 05:49 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,653 Champaign County, Ohio.
KeithC
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,653
Champaign County, Ohio.
|
People receiving welfare need to have to pay for what they get, through their labor or by giving up their reproductive rights, or our country is doomed.
We can not go on helping the worst people in our society to produce more people just like them. It's not right to enslave working Americans to those who won't or can't work. It's also not sustainable to keep breeding progressively more non productive human beings, who take resources from those who earned them. Soon there will be more failures then decent human beings.
Keith Just because the parent/parents ain't worth two cents, it doesn't mean the children will be the same. That's Margaret Sanger thought and in no way is it right. Now to stop paying people for having babies or providing an "out" for poor reproductive behavior is perfectly acceptable, IMO. Like produces like, most of the time. Adult human beings should be given the choices to 1. support yourself completely and procreate how you want, 2. pay back the cost of your aid by doing work that helps the people of the United States, who are having to support you and procreate how you want, 3. be implanted with temporary birth control if you choose to receive aid and won't work, 4. don't receive aid and starve. Once someone was off public assistance and was not living off the labor of others, the implanted birth control could be legally removed, unless they were on public assistance for some long period of time, like 7 years, after reaching the age of 18. I believe poor children should be given what they need to thrive, including education and counseling to help them become happy, productive members of society. Keith
|
|
|
Re: Profound paragraph from 1931
[Re: Flipper 56]
#6609657
09/04/19 05:55 PM
09/04/19 05:55 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,831 Asheville, NC
charles
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 10,831
Asheville, NC
|
Don’t need to fund their tobacco use either. Just leads to higher health cost in the future. Cost a lot on both ends.
Last edited by charles; 09/04/19 05:57 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Profound paragraph from 1931
[Re: Flipper 56]
#6609676
09/04/19 06:30 PM
09/04/19 06:30 PM
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
J Staton
Unregistered
|
Keith how about letting people procreate whether poor or wealthy. That would fall into the group of unalienable rights. Procreation, or the ending of is not a right given by man. As for forcing the taxpayer to fund ignorant behavior, that is nothing more than theft. I firmly believe, "If you don't work, you don't eat!"
|
|
|
Re: Profound paragraph from 1931
[Re: ]
#6609681
09/04/19 06:41 PM
09/04/19 06:41 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,653 Champaign County, Ohio.
KeithC
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,653
Champaign County, Ohio.
|
Keith how about letting people procreate whether poor or wealthy. That would fall into the group of unalienable rights. Procreation, or the ending of is not a right given by man. As for forcing the taxpayer to fund ignorant behavior, that is nothing more than theft. I firmly believe, "If you don't work, you don't eat!" Nobody would be forced not to procreate under my plan. It is totally their choice. Choices do always have consequences. Keith
|
|
|
Re: Profound paragraph from 1931
[Re: ]
#6609682
09/04/19 06:41 PM
09/04/19 06:41 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,293 PA
lumberjack391
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 2,293
PA
|
Keith how about letting people procreate whether poor or wealthy. That would fall into the group of unalienable rights. Procreation, or the ending of is not a right given by man. As for forcing the taxpayer to fund ignorant behavior, that is nothing more than theft. I firmly believe, "If you don't work, you don't eat!" I always figured if your that bad off you cant work than you cant procreate either- or if you can procreate you can at least do something for work.
Last edited by lumberjack391; 09/04/19 06:44 PM.
|
|
|
|
|