no deer here.

Nope, that's why I only get two doe tags for up there.

Lugnut my math skills were way off it would actually take 100 years to kill 400 with just standard tags. Now the Game and Fish will issue extra tags for doe culling and also for depredation.
Not doubting bucksnbears claim. If one is blessed with the wealth and/or job to take the necessary time off to deer hunt daily, combined with the proper tags and numbers it could be done.
Like I said for me personally I'm not that mad at them. I would rather be trapping anyway.

I only kill what my family can eat J Staton which is usually three deer a year.

I was just pointing out that in certain areas (like mine) it would be theoretically possible to kill a great number of deer in a relatively short period of time.

I don't doubt Bucksnbears claims either. Especially after hearing from folks that know him.

These threads have been awesome, no joking. I have no idea how many deer I’ve shot, or will ever shoot in my life, might have to sit down one day and figure it out.....naaahhh, just fill tags I got and help friends and neighbors fill theirs. Best of luck to anyone out their enjoying nature and putting some food on the table.

i've killed WAY over 400 possums.look that one up.

^^^Lmao!! Possum County Redneck2

Hey Lug nut: I copied this check the math,you stated, (So, theoretically I could purchase fifty tags a year and reach four hundred deer in four years.)
Now I am not sure but 50 tags x 4 years is 200 deer? LOL

Whoops!

I musta been using fuzzy math!

JBYRD. Did you not say that I said I've shot (over )400 deer? Yes or no?
Now, did I say I've shot ( over) 400 deer, yes or no?

I've proved you ( and Snowy ) a liar!
Have you proved me a liar?
Yes or no?

This is so easy to prove yet you keep digging yourself deeper


Also, thanks to the good folks willing to donate to the fund on their behalf since they both

Pics are worth a thousand words...so let's see them..

Round it down to 380 deer, or a truck load of deer as you claimed you have shot..

Pics of passing up all these bucks..

Pics of all these trophy bucks you've shot..

Every post you litter if snowy and jbyrd63 replied or start..

if your the bad (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman) killer you say you are let's see the proof ..or go back to your playground and be quiet...

You've proven you wear your balls on a necklace around your neck...what more do we need to hear..

Your the best killing deer machine that ever existed and a couple members here are off by a couple deer you have claimed to shoot...I'm sure if you made proof of all the kills via pics this would end..so let's see them 380 deer you killed...

You prove it I'll give 75$ to the trappers defense fund...Also donate 6 1 1/2 Bridger coils to any youth that is in need of traps...


Let's see it..

Know a guy who cracked 100 before he could legally buy a beer.
Had no limit on does here, and he'd take 20-30 some years.

I made mention of shooting control on a large spread down on the Texas border where they had well over 100 cull tags per year were filled. The meat was taken immediately to the nearest border town and there distributed to poorer people on both sides of the border. Sounds like a lot and was in that Texas sun but they had a walk in cooler primarily for the people to use who had leased out spots there for trophy deer. We cut them in there and took them to town.
One does not take pictures of that anymore than many carcasses of a good trapping harvest.
The son of that ranch owner who does most of that culling each year and the ranch manager have each got to be near or in the 4 digit range of deer taken.
In a lot of ways I think big whitetail numbers are achieved as many others have posted as well. Particularly after 40-50 years of shooting.

Osky

Crickets LOL LOL

just looked on my phone so check back tomorrow

No 15-20 would do not want to break the internet with all the carnage .
I love the one were he says he killed number 189 3 days ago . BUT when I said wait I thought you were at 400 ??? Number 189 was with his bow ..........

Sorry Ambush. I do not have pics of all the deer.

JBYRD,, yes or no?
Or did you miss the post about 5 back?

What is interesting in this post is we have coyotes here and wolves passing through, and the fawn crop gets slaughtered by the predators. Our deer are never standing around as they are spooked by the canines and the cats. That is what makes the large numbers odd, as I used to hunt a great deal in the Black Hills, when their population was very high in deer, and we never saw 400 bucks in the entire hills. With the lions, wolves and coyotes working things over, it is rare to see deer driving around enjoying the scenery anymore.

I am just trying to figure out the secret the Minnesota DNR has, as with all those deer to eat, why are the wolves and coyotes always pushing out to western Minnesota and the Dakotas looking for things to eat where the numbers are suffering in having too many predators pressing into the region.
In my habitat here in this 36 section township, I know every trophy buck to every spike, and there are not 400 deer total. I would that all of us had these DNR numbers as we keep getting metro hunters out here, and no one cares for it.

I saw a pic of jbyrd with five raccoons once.

By some of the logic being used on here, I guess that means that's the grand total of all the animals he has killed in his lifetime.

In fact, I've seen more pics of his lawn, than animals he's killed.

I think it is time for Wheelers to step in and make a decision, that both parties agree to honor.

Keith

The wolves arent expanding out because they are running out of food, they are dispersing, there is a difference. You may not have 400 deer in your township but we do. That's only 11 per square mile, maybe our habitat is better.

Ha ain't in Texas LOL

yes buying extra tags make it possible but at what price ???? Still waiting on how many deer can be legally killed in the district/ county where you live bucksnbull ????