No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Social v Economic #6670138
11/19/19 06:53 PM
11/19/19 06:53 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
I'm in a good mood this evening. Had a great day at work.


Lets have a fun civil discussion.


When did people start caring more about social issues rather than economic issues when it comes to national conversation and politics.

No talking about 21st century politicians as they are way too late.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670141
11/19/19 06:56 PM
11/19/19 06:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,165
Three Lakes,WI 72
C
corky Offline
trapper
corky  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,165
Three Lakes,WI 72
Civil War followed by Civil Rights Act of 1964 and set in stone by Roe v Wade 1973

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670144
11/19/19 06:58 PM
11/19/19 06:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
It is hard to separate the two as they are extremely intertwined but if I had to pick one turning point historically I would strongly consider the French revolution as well as the American revolution.

If you want to go back even further the murder of Socrates probably awakened many people to social issues.

EDIT- if we are talking strictly American I would say the Civil war.

Last edited by Donnersurvivor; 11/19/19 06:59 PM.
Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670146
11/19/19 06:59 PM
11/19/19 06:59 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,631
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,631
Champaign County, Ohio.
Most people only care more about social issues while the country is doing well economically.

Keith

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6670154
11/19/19 07:07 PM
11/19/19 07:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Donnersurvivor
It is hard to separate the two as they are extremely intertwined but if I had to pick one turning point historically I would strongly consider the French revolution as well as the American revolution.

If you want to go back even further the murder of Socrates probably awakened many people to social issues.

EDIT- if we are talking strictly American I would say the Civil war.

Sorry....yes, I'm referring to America.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: KeithC] #6670157
11/19/19 07:08 PM
11/19/19 07:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by KeithC
Most people only care more about social issues while the country is doing well economically.

Keith

I agree but Why do you say this? Lets have a great conversation.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: KeithC] #6670163
11/19/19 07:15 PM
11/19/19 07:15 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
Social issues are always to the forefront except during econmic crisis. It's why the last election was as close as it was because both major candidates were terrible on bott fronts but if not for the Scalia seat, it would of sent the other way. It's partly why the midterms went the way it did.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670167
11/19/19 07:19 PM
11/19/19 07:19 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,568
western alaska
Malukchuk Offline
trapper
Malukchuk  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,568
western alaska
It all started in the 60s


Water is good for two things, Floating Ships and making Beer.
Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670173
11/19/19 07:23 PM
11/19/19 07:23 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,631
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,631
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Pike River
Originally Posted by KeithC
Most people only care more about social issues while the country is doing well economically.

Keith

I agree but Why do you say this? Lets have a great conversation.


The reason is that most social issues are of very trivial importance. When people are starving all of their concentration goes to finding food. When people are homeless, all their concentration goes to finding a home. When people are dying of thirst, all their concentration goes to finding something to drink.

Abraham Maslow listed a hierarchy of needs for humans, that has a great deal of truth to it.

[Linked Image]

I will go further and state that we as a species need to go through tough times to winnow out the poor genetics or we will weaken as a species. We need to have the drive to go after the lower needs first.

We are both animal and divine.

Keith

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670180
11/19/19 07:26 PM
11/19/19 07:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
Originally Posted by Pike River
Originally Posted by Donnersurvivor
It is hard to separate the two as they are extremely intertwined but if I had to pick one turning point historically I would strongly consider the French revolution as well as the American revolution.

If you want to go back even further the murder of Socrates probably awakened many people to social issues.

EDIT- if we are talking strictly American I would say the Civil war.

Sorry....yes, I'm referring to America.



No need to apologize, my fault for misreading.

Thinking further on this there is no doubt in my mind the defining moment when social issues started to be pushed to the forefront was suffrage. First major thing that happened after suffrage was prohibition and social issues have been central to most campaigns since then.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670191
11/19/19 07:38 PM
11/19/19 07:38 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,492
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,492
james bay frontierOnt.
Not long after the great depression.And just before the second world war.

Last edited by Boco; 11/19/19 07:39 PM.

Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670196
11/19/19 07:41 PM
11/19/19 07:41 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,785
Northern lower Michigan
Feedinggrounds Online happy
trapper
Feedinggrounds  Online Happy
trapper

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,785
Northern lower Michigan
One needs to be able to see through the fog or haze all the time. Some seemingly popular social issues are simply what a certain politician, party or group feels will get them the most favor or votes at any particular time. Sometimes though real issues and problems exist. Separate the problem solvers and decent ideas by some, from those who simply take advantage of issues, with zero intention of implementing any type of solution.


you're only allowed so many sunrises... I aim to see every one of them!
Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670205
11/19/19 07:46 PM
11/19/19 07:46 PM

J
J Staton
Unregistered
J Staton
Unregistered
J



I think this happened about two thousand and nineteen years ago.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Donnersurvivor] #6670208
11/19/19 07:47 PM
11/19/19 07:47 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
Originally Posted by Donnersurvivor
.

Thinking further on this there is no doubt in my mind the defining moment when social issues started to be pushed to the forefront was suffrage. First major thing that happened after suffrage was prohibition and social issues have been central to most campaigns since then.


Slavery was and still is a social issue. Unfortunately nobody cares about today's slavery of more people than ever existed during the western slave trade. All attention is on the old slavery.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: ] #6670213
11/19/19 07:50 PM
11/19/19 07:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,342
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,342
East-Central Wisconsin
To this actually started in the late 1800s when this country began the switch that character was important instead of personality. We now have carried that significant behavior change to the extreme and much of it started when we were able to sit and passively watch on TV what people wanted us to see.

Bryce

Re: Social v Economic [Re: SNIPERBBB] #6670237
11/19/19 08:07 PM
11/19/19 08:07 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB
Originally Posted by Donnersurvivor
.

Thinking further on this there is no doubt in my mind the defining moment when social issues started to be pushed to the forefront was suffrage. First major thing that happened after suffrage was prohibition and social issues have been central to most campaigns since then.


Slavery was and still is a social issue. Unfortunately nobody cares about today's slavery of more people than ever existed during the western slave trade. All attention is on the old slavery.


Freed slaves made up a tiny amount of the total voting population, women instantly were 50% of the voting bloc. I dont think pre suffrage most people were voting based on slavery but I am open to being wrong about that.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670250
11/19/19 08:14 PM
11/19/19 08:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
Really? The slavery issue nearly prevented the Constitution from being ratified and tore the country apart. Has nothing to do with who could or could not vote.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670253
11/19/19 08:17 PM
11/19/19 08:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
At the turn of the 19th century there definitely was a lot socially going in. Totally forgot about suffrage and prohibition. Seems like a huge tide abiut that time.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: SNIPERBBB] #6670255
11/19/19 08:18 PM
11/19/19 08:18 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB
Really? The slavery issue nearly prevented the Constitution from being ratified and tore the country apart. Has nothing to do with who could or could not vote.

A significant part was moral/social but I also think that it was also economic. No?

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670264
11/19/19 08:24 PM
11/19/19 08:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
Originally Posted by Pike River
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB
Really? The slavery issue nearly prevented the Constitution from being ratified and tore the country apart. Has nothing to do with who could or could not vote.

A significant part was moral/social but I also think that it was also economic. No?


That was my line of thinking as well, more economic than social.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670266
11/19/19 08:26 PM
11/19/19 08:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,636
Rodney,Ohio
Not really. Slavery wasn't exactly the gold mine people today thought it was for the plantations. In fact it was nearly done in until the cotton gin was invented then it had a resurgence. Small wonder why the inventor doesn't get much flack today.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6670292
11/19/19 08:46 PM
11/19/19 08:46 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
The cotton gin was invented in the late 1700s. Slavery I think was a social issue for the Midwest/great lakes and rural New England and economic for those in the south and urban New England.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: SNIPERBBB] #6670295
11/19/19 08:49 PM
11/19/19 08:49 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,342
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,342
East-Central Wisconsin
In 1860 there were 9 million people living in the states that formed the Confederacy. Of those 9 million almost 1 million were slaves or 10% of the population or more. With an agriculture based economy that utilized slave labor the argument that slavery was not an economic issue to the south holds little water. The main asset the south had most like was their human owned assets as it was an asset that could be bought and sold and the labor created the revenue from their land. Losing slaves as assets was a major cause of concern for the south and after 4 years of war and losing that war they were right in believing so.

Bryce

Re: Social v Economic [Re: bblwi] #6670574
11/20/19 06:41 AM
11/20/19 06:41 AM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by bblwi
In 1860 there were 9 million people living in the states that formed the Confederacy. Of those 9 million almost 1 million were slaves or 10% of the population or more. With an agriculture based economy that utilized slave labor the argument that slavery was not an economic issue to the south holds little water. The main asset the south had most like was their human owned assets as it was an asset that could be bought and sold and the labor created the revenue from their land. Losing slaves as assets was a major cause of concern for the south and after 4 years of war and losing that war they were right in believing so.

Bryce

Would be interesting to see property tax or insurance records to determine what was the assessed value of those in slavery. Also would be curious what was the ROI for the average size slave holding property.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6671272
11/20/19 09:59 PM
11/20/19 09:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,342
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,342
East-Central Wisconsin
Forty percent of all the slaves sold in the USA were sold in Charleston, SC. I don't know about taxes or property insurance etc. but the may well have many records of sale prices of the human assets which could be used to formulate a total value of all the slaves. It probably is the best place due to the volume of sales there. Also many were purchased long before the USA was created so that may impact records as well.

Bryce

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6671285
11/20/19 10:18 PM
11/20/19 10:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,497
Southern NJ
maintenanceguy Offline
trapper
maintenanceguy  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,497
Southern NJ
Originally Posted by Pike River
When did people start caring more about social issues rather than economic issues when it comes to national conversation and politics.


When economic needs are met, it's no longer the most important issue. It started with the industrial revolution. Machines made it possible for one person to do the production of 10 people. People moved away from hard labor to earn their money to just plain old labor. With production way up, everyone became wealthy. Wealthy people don't worry about money.


-Ryan
Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6671316
11/20/19 10:51 PM
11/20/19 10:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17,740
Central Oregon
AntiGov Offline
trapper
AntiGov  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 17,740
Central Oregon
When collectivism became came more atractive economically to those who lacked the necessary effort to succeed individually

60 ' s maybe


Report a post club - Non member


Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6671340
11/20/19 11:34 PM
11/20/19 11:34 PM
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,762
Wisconsin
B
Bear Tracker Offline
trapper
Bear Tracker  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,762
Wisconsin
FDR and the Depression era. The social programs that were passed, works programs, social security, CCC, FHA, CWA, FSA, PWA, TVA, etc. (sorry I got interrupted.) No one should suffer like the Depression brought out. (mentality) These programs take us to where we are today. I understand the slavery point and agree but to me The Depression changed it all. FDR Democrats elected Dems until Nixon in 1968.

Last edited by Bear Tracker; 11/20/19 11:40 PM.
Re: Social v Economic [Re: AntiGov] #6671343
11/20/19 11:39 PM
11/20/19 11:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by AntiGov
When collectivism became came more atractive economically to those who lacked the necessary effort to succeed individually

60 ' s maybe

1860's?

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Bear Tracker] #6671345
11/20/19 11:41 PM
11/20/19 11:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Bear Tracker
FDR and the Depression era. The social programs that were passed, works programs, social security, etc. No one should suffer like the Depression brought out. (mentality)

I was reading something the other day from the depression era that people were that they were glad they were American poor rather than old world poor.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6671348
11/20/19 11:43 PM
11/20/19 11:43 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline OP
trapper
Pike River  Offline OP
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
I'm still really stuck on suffrage, prohibition and the late golden age. Lots of commies and anarchist, 2 presidents assassinated and more bombings than I can count.

Re: Social v Economic [Re: Pike River] #6671384
11/21/19 01:32 AM
11/21/19 01:32 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,201
Alaska and Washington State
W
waggler Offline
trapper
waggler  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,201
Alaska and Washington State
Mid to late 1960's. The Vietnam war, drugs, introspection (while on drugs), Eastern mysticism, etc, etc..
OP asked when it started. I don't know why it started but the things I mentioned above may have had something to do with it.


"My life is better than your vacation"
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread