No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Beltrami County says no to refugees [Re: trapper les] #6723913
01/10/20 08:30 PM
01/10/20 08:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25,412
williams,mn
trapper les Offline OP
trapper
trapper les  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25,412
williams,mn
We need solutions, not reason why we cant do things.

I view islam as a genocidal death cult, and a threat to our western culture. It's not about color at all. If you see something is gonna be bad, you have to do something about it. Sooner or later there will be an all out genocide in this country if we don't ship them out now, I don't really care about their perceived rights.


"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Re: Beltrami County says no to refugees [Re: Osky] #6723919
01/10/20 08:32 PM
01/10/20 08:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25,412
williams,mn
trapper les Offline OP
trapper
trapper les  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 25,412
williams,mn
Originally Posted by Osky
It's not about Somalis for that county. They could be from anywhere. The northern counties of Minnesota are hit hard each winter with jobs fading until spring, big uptick in unemployment, and a burgeoning welfare as the people up here who never made the kind of money the folks south of here have and are aging and can't move out. Of course they have the drug and unwed mothers issues etc to deal with.
No one said anyone of any race or religion wasn't allowed to come there to live, work, and contribute, and have a go at it. The folks there do not want the matching funds and other dangling carrot goodies that they then have to match or maintain if they sign on to take refugees.
The most alarming thing of all this is the trampling of rights of the people in that county. They are doing nothing illegal. They were given the opportunity to vote and choose as have all the counties/cities in America. They voted and that vote should be honored. That's freedom. The news today here is going on and on about how lawmakers in St. Paul are going to withhold funds, grants, and other programs to these northern folks for exercising their right to make a choice, the choice those those lawmakers from other areas don't like. What, this is now Nazi Germany 2? If the state or Feds do that I hope that county sues them to death. The folks made a choice, let it stand!

Osky

Amen, hold strong, and let it stand. If poor counties have to rely too much on Government to survive, let the poor and the weaklings leave if we cant support them. Welfare needs to be curtailed to begin with.


"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Re: Beltrami County says no to refugees [Re: trapper les] #6723921
01/10/20 08:33 PM
01/10/20 08:33 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,634
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,634
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by James
Ending birthright citizenship? Where WE be without it?

Besides, ending it would take a Constitutional amendment.

Jim



Only 35 of the 195 countries in existence give citizenship for being born there. The other 34 countries. that give citizenship for birth, are countries that I see no good reason to emulate.

When America was founded we needed people. At the time, the only people who could get here on their own were highly motivated, driven individuals, who came to work hard to make better lives for themselves and their families. Even the indentured servants that had their way paid, were highly motivated. Black slaves and some white prisoners, who were mainly settled in Georgia, were admittedly less motivated to come here to work hard for better lives for themselves and families. For the most part we received very hard working immigrants.

Now, we only need the best quality immigrants. The immigrants that steal across our borders to give birth to an anchor baby, are poor, uneducated people who are only going to become a public charge.

Our Constitution should not be changed lightly. We have had to change our Constitution for good reasons before. Stopping criminals and others from using anchor babies to circumvent our immigration system's laws is a great reason to change the Constitution.

Keith

Re: Beltrami County says no to refugees [Re: trapper les] #6723950
01/10/20 08:51 PM
01/10/20 08:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,871
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,871
williamsburg ks
Changing the constitution is one thing. It's quite another to get those blacked robed idiots to change it by "interpretation".


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Beltrami County says no to refugees [Re: trapper les] #6723964
01/10/20 09:00 PM
01/10/20 09:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,467
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,467
MN
Originally Posted by trapper les
Originally Posted by Osky
It's not about Somalis for that county. They could be from anywhere. The northern counties of Minnesota are hit hard each winter with jobs fading until spring, big uptick in unemployment, and a burgeoning welfare as the people up here who never made the kind of money the folks south of here have and are aging and can't move out. Of course they have the drug and unwed mothers issues etc to deal with.
No one said anyone of any race or religion wasn't allowed to come there to live, work, and contribute, and have a go at it. The folks there do not want the matching funds and other dangling carrot goodies that they then have to match or maintain if they sign on to take refugees.
The most alarming thing of all this is the trampling of rights of the people in that county. They are doing nothing illegal. They were given the opportunity to vote and choose as have all the counties/cities in America. They voted and that vote should be honored. That's freedom. The news today here is going on and on about how lawmakers in St. Paul are going to withhold funds, grants, and other programs to these northern folks for exercising their right to make a choice, the choice those those lawmakers from other areas don't like. What, this is now Nazi Germany 2? If the state or Feds do that I hope that county sues them to death. The folks made a choice, let it stand!

Osky

Amen, hold strong, and let it stand. If poor counties have to rely too much on Government to survive, let the poor and the weaklings leave if we cant support them. Welfare needs to be curtailed to begin with.


Well said Osky, our county has plenty of our own problems to deal with. I appreciate the County board taking a stand.

Re: Beltrami County says no to refugees [Re: danny clifton] #6723994
01/10/20 09:30 PM
01/10/20 09:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,576
MN
Originally Posted by danny clifton
Changing the constitution is one thing. It's quite another to get those blacked robed idiots to change it by "interpretation".


Go look into the 14th amendment and how it was "ratified", it should not be part of the constitution.

Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread