No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Wisconsin "Protect our Piers" #6788792
03/01/20 03:36 PM
03/01/20 03:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,897
Wisconsin
E
Eagleye Offline OP
trapper
Eagleye  Offline OP
trapper
E

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,897
Wisconsin
I recieved a flyer in the mail and today I saw a billboard for this group advocating protection of waterfront property owners???

MADISON – Wisconsinites will soon begin seeing ads supporting a bill aimed at protecting the rights of waterfront property owners who want to build piers and docks.

The ad campaign is sponsored by the Wisconsin Homeowners Alliance and will feature statewide radio, mail, video and digital ads. It's called "Protect our Piers" and will begin airing Monday.

The bill for which the ad campaign is hoping to drum up support is a response to a 2018 Wisconsin Supreme Court decision that ruled a Price County couple could not build a pier off their waterfront property because another couple owned the land under the lake bed.

In her dissenting opinion, Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley wrote the court's ruling overturned rights recognized under the common law for at least 140 years.

"The consequences of what began as a family squabble are not confined to the parties before us but fundamentally transform property rights for thousands of Wisconsin property owners along hundreds of flowages," Grassl Bradley wrote. "Such a dramatic change in the law should be the legislature's prerogative, not that of the four justices comprising the majority."

For more information on the "Protect our Piers" campaign, visit protectourpiers.org.

Re: Wisconsin "Protect our Piers" [Re: Eagleye] #6788797
03/01/20 03:38 PM
03/01/20 03:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline
trapper
Pike River  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
Thanks for sharing. I also saw a billboard today. Didnt really make sense to me.

Re: Wisconsin "Protect our Piers" [Re: Eagleye] #6788799
03/01/20 03:41 PM
03/01/20 03:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
P
Pike River Offline
trapper
Pike River  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 5,570
Dunbar, Wisconsin
If the large changes and people are allowed to anchor piers to a lake bed that another person owns I wonder if that will affect water trapping in privately owned lake beds.

Re: Wisconsin "Protect our Piers" [Re: Pike River] #6788807
03/01/20 03:47 PM
03/01/20 03:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,897
Wisconsin
E
Eagleye Offline OP
trapper
Eagleye  Offline OP
trapper
E

Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,897
Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Pike River
If the large changes and people are allowed to anchor piers to a lake bed that another person owns I wonder if that will affect water trapping in privately owned lake beds.


My thought exactly- I'm wondering if the dispute is determining the Ordinary High Water Mark? here's how the Wisconsin DNR defines it:


Wisconsin's Waters Belong to Everyone

Wisconsin lakes and rivers are public resources, owned in common by all Wisconsin citizens under the state's Public Trust Doctrine. Based on the state constitution, this doctrine has been further defined by case law and statute. It declares that all navigable waters are "common highways and forever free", and held in trust by the Department of Natural Resources.

Re: Wisconsin "Protect our Piers" [Re: Eagleye] #6788982
03/01/20 07:04 PM
03/01/20 07:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,340
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,340
East-Central Wisconsin
Might want or need to check on who owns the land to the middle of the flowing water on flowages etc. The water is public but the land underneath is not if it is a flowage or a river for the most part. As to this pier in question if the person would have constructed a floating pier that is attached to the land via the lot line then there would not have been any involvement in utilizing the land beneath the pier. This could really get hairy for those that want to exercise their rights as lake flowage and river land owners. I trap in a couple flowages where I am not having issues, who knows how that would go down the road.

Bryce

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread