You're a bit off on the numbers, sir.

The Soviet Union ALONE lost more soldiers and civilians than 8 million.

United States lost between 400,000 and 600,000 in World War II.

w

Yes, I realize that, it was the number that came to mind when I made the post. I know now I was way off but the point is still the same.

Yup,

Point taken.

w

There is still so much vacant land out there.

Until there’s not. Think our grandkids will have as many hunting/trapping opportunities as we do now? Or less?

The white population (which was more than 90% in 1969) has actually been below replacement rate in this country since then. Our increasing population comes solely from immigration, which is why this country has changed so much. Unfortunately, the baby boomer generation were responsible for the "cultural revolution" which has led us to this point and screwed thier children and grandchilren out of having the same opportunity and abundance that their parents/grandparent had in the 50's and 60's.

1. Where did you get your 90% statistic?

2. Besides middle-class white males, who had great opportunities and abundance in the 50's and 60's?

3. If no "cultural revolution" but everything else stayed the same, what would 2020 look like?

Nope! One of the best duck/muskrat sloughs in the area is now a housing development. Every day we lose more land to development, just look at the rain forest.

Its the opposite here-less people now than 30 years ago.Land everywhere with no people.

1) Excuse me, between 1960 and 1970 the percentage was between 86% and 87%. That's according to the U.S. census.
2) Everyone.
3) We would have kept our industry, less working dead end service industry jobs, fewer STD's and probably NO AIDS, no mass immigration from 3rd world countries, less poverty, less single parent households (both white and black), less homelessness, less governmental overreach, more family farms, the "cultural revolution affected every aspect of society. If the cultural revolution had not happened nothing else would have stayed the same my friend.

You completely lost me at 2....for no other reasons than voting rights and redlining. I gave up on you at 3 with the mention of "fewer STD's and probably NO AIDS."

Even though it may be bad for the species, growing populations are necessary to make government Ponzi schemes function. It is a catch 22.

I can see it all now . People living in caves, no meds , no medical services , not much of anything. What will the poor snowflakes do? We will all be cavemen fighting to survive another day.

What's the reason for that? Nobody wants to live there?

Decline in logging.Paper mills shut down.

Right, nobody wants to live there.

LOL

Hard to believe people can't thrive there on all that Top Lot northern fur.

Not with todays market-no shortage of the top lot northern fur though.
Its not that people dont want to live here,but you gotta be the outdoors type to love it here.Soft people dont do well here,its a tougher type of life here and a lot dont have that anymore.
I like the freedom though.I would never live anywhere else.
My Daughter left for the city-My son stayed and works at the mine.

would you wanna live next to Boco????