the good news is the covid 19 does have high percent survival rate.or the numbers would be much worse than they are......if everyone does there part it will be slowed or contained much more quickly....then we can get all the medical supplies and ventilators needed to match the incoming cases.

I guess I don't see how it will run its course more quickly if everybody goes into isolation. to me that doesn't make sense at all. To me that will drag it out which is the goal supposedly so supposedly don't overwhelm the Healthcare System allegedly. Dragging it out harmful to the economy Which will lead to health problems from stress and anxiety from people losing their livelihoods and jobs in businesses and money in their 401K so on so forth

I have a suggestion for my stalker, but you won't like it. Lol

If the average death rate in the USA is about 850 per 100K or about or about .8% then the best way for us to look at Covid cases is at the end of the year to see how much that may have spiked. If the science is close to accurate and we loose 100-250K then the death rate will go up about .3 to .6 % Which does not sound like a lot but it would be a 35-70% increase roughly.

Bryce

I've been tracking the COVID stats put out by the CDC. This morning 4/5/2020 the CDC showed 2,624 deaths for New York. I checked again tonight at 9:35 p.m. they had fallen to 2,472. I guess it could be a reporting error. I'm not sure how else you over report 100+ deaths in one city.






ol'dad

Some good news.

I have a suggestion for my stalker, but you won't like it. Lol[/quote/ hippie]..........your stalker posted first lol your post follows mine...who is stalking who? I have been reading the same thing from you on the( flu kills people to)
on every post about covid 19 for a week now......we get it !!!!! maybe try to stay on topic

...good info thanks Jeff

More Good News.

Looks like the death numbers have been revised by the doctor that made the model we are using, and now its not even as bad as the regular seasonal flue deaths.

Here is the link I follow: https://ncov2019.live/?fbclid=IwAR0VotRoMDp3guwcMyL5ZPpNR5eGA47AGPtMbVacMVMX8PmuNIPvoAPYM6Q

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/one-america-news-network/

"Overall, we rate One America News Far right biased based on story selection that consistently favors the Right and Mixed for factual reporting due to promotion of conspiracies, lack of sourcing and a few failed fact checks. OANN is one failed fact check away from moving to the Questionable Source list."

I have posted about the site "media bias fact check" before and of course no one seemed to care.

OAN is listed as literally being one more failed fact-check away from being a permanently questionable source. On the scale of factual, it is about as far away from unbiased as a source can be.

Notice I'm not commenting at all regarding what I think, feel, etc regarding current events. I am saying that just because a source says something agreeable does not mean it is actually true. Yes, there are plenty of heavily slanted liberal news productions, however, there are definitely equally slanted conservative productions as well.

Numbers can be arranged to support any hypothesis a person can dream up, this is the reason for academic discoveries needing peer-review and months/years of testing. This round of coronavirus just hasn't been around long enough to offer a chance at qualified, proven data so far.

The state of journalism today is pretty sad. The actual point at which news reporting stopped being unbiased is probably much longer ago than most people would be comfortable admitting. When I say that I mean 50 years or more.

You better fact check your fact checkers. OAN is the most reliable,unbiased news out there.

People will believe anything that fits their own agenda and discount any opposite views-regardless of the reliability of the source or lack thereof.
That is why the shills are able to pass themselves off a journalists which they are anything but.

Very true Boco.

Here we are two weeks out. We've had 24 cases confirmed in our county. The majority of them came from an infected assisted living with arguably the most vulnerable populations nine days ago. One 91 year old has died the other staff/patients have all survived nine days out. We have had one positive community spread in town in an otherwise healthy 50 some year old that was asymptomatic other than shortness of breath...he's been able to handle himself at home. We've yet to admit a positive Covid to the hospital and it's definitely being spread in the community people are self isolating with it and not seeking medical care.

It's been here for over a week confirmed (community spread) and the flood of patients isn't arriving. Even the most vulnerable patients are surviving it. I know the "peak" now isn't expected to hit till the end of May. I've been hearing next week for 5-6 weeks now. I expect come May when the sun comes up the goal posts will move again. Our local economy is not going to bounce back from this. The virus is still going to be the least of our worries in the coming months.

I scooped the media by two days. Now they are using the term logrithemic. They seem not to want to use the term linear?

This is very, very far from true. Do some research.