Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
#6851064
04/22/20 08:40 AM
04/22/20 08:40 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 909 SD
TC1
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 909
SD
|
Just listened to a snippet on talk radio about this something about using reclaimed fur. Sounds a little suspect, anyone else have any knowledge of this? It was only a ten second piece.
Long live the MAGA King
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851078
04/22/20 08:59 AM
04/22/20 08:59 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,274 NWT
Ryan McLeod
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,274
NWT
|
They’re just planning on using road killed fur bearers from what I’ve read. Money saving measure.
If you take care of the land the land will take care of you
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851107
04/22/20 09:28 AM
04/22/20 09:28 AM
|
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 28,978 potter co. p.a.
pcr2
"Twerker"
|
"Twerker"
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 28,978
potter co. p.a.
|
beaver and skunk will rule the market again soon.
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851111
04/22/20 09:37 AM
04/22/20 09:37 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,593 Georgia
warrior
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 25,593
Georgia
|
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851137
04/22/20 10:24 AM
04/22/20 10:24 AM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,354 Saskatchewan
rvsask
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,354
Saskatchewan
|
Yes, but will they use real fur??? I want to believe they will.
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851139
04/22/20 10:25 AM
04/22/20 10:25 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,685 ND
MJM
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,685
ND
|
A couple year back CG wanted trappers to sign saying that their coyotes were taken in accordance to the law. Trappers said pound sand. CG said then they would move away from fur with out it. The same thing happened with LL Bean in the 1970's. Who fault was it?
"Not Really, Not Really" Mark J Monti "MJM you're a jerk."
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: MJM]
#6851147
04/22/20 10:34 AM
04/22/20 10:34 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,181 Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,181
Armpit, ak
|
A couple year back CG wanted trappers to sign saying that their coyotes were taken in accordance to the law. Trappers said pound sand. CG said then they would move away from fur with out it. The same thing happened with LL Bean in the 1970's. Who fault was it? This summary is not accurate imo
Last edited by Dirt; 04/22/20 10:57 AM.
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: MJM]
#6851155
04/22/20 10:47 AM
04/22/20 10:47 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,719 pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,719
pa
|
A couple year back CG wanted trappers to sign saying that their coyotes were taken in accordance to the law. Trappers said pound sand. CG said then they would move away from fur with out it. The same thing happened with LL Bean in the 1970's. Who fault was it? Are you sure it doesn't go like this. Even with trappers signing papers confirming all laws were followed, Canada Goose is still moving away from fur?
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851191
04/22/20 11:24 AM
04/22/20 11:24 AM
|
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,354 Saskatchewan
rvsask
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 1,354
Saskatchewan
|
While not a huge market like Canada Goose, I've seen here in SK local businesses that specialize in fur trimmed garments pop up and really thrive and grow. I see no reason why that trend can not continue. This is an example of one that has really started to thrive and grow. Sask Fur
Last edited by rvsask; 04/22/20 11:25 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Canada Goose going "environmentally friendly"
[Re: TC1]
#6851218
04/22/20 11:57 AM
04/22/20 11:57 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,181 Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 11,181
Armpit, ak
|
Cg has a history of lying to consumers. Probably more of the same.
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
|
|