James,
Exactly what is a kangaroo court anyway?

(Using the tactic of the counselor. A man of many ? marks in his submission style).

I think we will see a taste of what is to come tonight at Trumps rally in Tulsa. Law and order against the America haters This may be where it all starts to snowball and show us what is to come. I am sure the Media will bash it in any way they can.

The real American Values and Trump supporters I guarantee won't put up with this radical harassment any longer. Wait and see if I am right.

Bringing people together at this point is a pipe dream. I think enough people let there guard down and let B.O. try his organizing skills. The country is going forward, where that leads us... who knows

Totally hinged around here.A few idiots here and there. Nothing that a concerned, well-prepared citizen can't take care of.
Stay hinged my friend. This too will soon pass.

The media has been bashing it since the rally was announced. I didn’t hear one good thing said about it other than on Fox News.

Arrest those reporters and put them on trial for lying and being wrong!

Mark, I'm surprised you're not familiar with the expression "kangaroo court." It refers to a court that gives a sham or cursory day in court for the accused.

Jim

kangaroo court....we have just seen that with democrats leaders and there impeachment sham lol and yes main stream media needs to be held accountable for knowing spreading lies!

The kangaroo part of the impeachment trial was when the Senate refused to call a single witness.

Imagine that a guy steals a car, and is put on trial. The prosecutor is not allowed to call a single witness.

The court would have to let the guy go. Big surprise.

Jim

Don’t be stupid.

He's a lawyer, so..........

Imagine that someone who does not like a guy turns in a false report saying he has stolen a car and the authorities who also know the report is false choose to investigate anyway because they really don't like the guy either. Before they get to court it is common knowledge that the original report that started the investigation was false. It is also known that the prosecutors don't like the falsely accused guy and want to go to court anyway to disparage the guy in any way they can even if they can't get him for nonexistent car theft. When the action gets to court the judge listens to the assertions of the prosecution known to be gathered using false if not illegal means and then throw it out of court based on that understanding. I believe dismissing a case because of faulty prosecution is a common court practice in most countries including the US.

This seems more like the scenario that played out in court (Senate).

.....how many witness was called in the house? that's there job not the senate lol .....next time let the guy steal the car first before you have court!

The trial was in the house, 43 witnesses and no one had any evidence of Russian anything. Yet the Dems would go on TV and say they had proof of wrong doing. Most of the Dems are blatant liars and they knew they were lying when they said it. They don't have an honest bone in their bodies.

No, the indictment was in the House.

The trial was supposed to have happened in the Senate. It didn't.

Jim

got to have witnesses for an indictment, they could have called anyone they wanted to......they didn't, its not the senate job to prove there case. the senate wasn't going to prosecute on no evidence lol

The House Dems had 43 of their witnesses and could find no wrong doing. Why would there be a trial with ZERO evidence. That would be as dishonest as impeaching Trump.

How many did they call in the Clinton impeachment. Its not uncommon for the Senate not to.

Exactly!

The Senate was the jury, not the fact finders no matter what the trolls say.

Republicans had no responsibility to participate in the Dems coup.