No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
Now that is some spooky crap. I too, thought private property meant just that...private. I guess the same doesn't pertain to the government in some states.
Life Member: ITA, IBA & NRA. Member of SA, FTA & NTA
Re: Government Cameras It's Here
[Re: dkrug]
#6960330 08/10/2007:40 PM08/10/2007:40 PM
Being TN it doesn't surprise me. They got hammered with policing for profit by a news source. They stole lots of money from people till they got caught.
No Jab.
Re: Government Cameras It's Here
[Re: dkrug]
#6960353 08/10/2008:07 PM08/10/2008:07 PM
Government put gps devices on work boats a couple years ago. lol
yeah....that didn't end well for the dnr when the captain called the state police bomb squad.
I do know of one camera down here that was found on private property and the owner left a note detailing that it would be available from his personal attorney in Cambridge if they wanted it back. Said lawyer was contacted by a govt flunky but camera is still in lawyer's possession if the story is true.
Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Re: Government Cameras It's Here
[Re: dkrug]
#6960376 08/10/2008:39 PM08/10/2008:39 PM
Real shady, That in itself is much worse than any game violation, and proves beyond doubt that those wildlife officers are more of a problem than any poacher or game violator.
Real shady, That in itself is much worse than any game violation, and proves beyond doubt that those wildlife officers are more of a problem than any poacher or game violator.
X2
NRA benefactor member
Re: Government Cameras It's Here
[Re: dkrug]
#6960450 08/10/2009:45 PM08/10/2009:45 PM
Would the State still have been able to place a camera on that Man's property, if he had installed a 4 strand barbed wire electric fence around his whole property ; including the gates?
Re: Government Cameras It's Here
[Re: dkrug]
#6960491 08/10/2010:10 PM08/10/2010:10 PM