If you saw someone driving recklessly, and they go on down the road, do you think you can maintain a lawsuit against them?

If they're driving recklessly, and bash up your car and put you in the hospital, then you have a case.

Jim

That was my original question too. How was Texas harmed ? I suspect that is the route Roberts will use to shut this down. BUT...........I suspect that from a federal perspective , all votes must be treated equally in accordance with state statute under article 2 section 1. The state legislatures are supreme. Clearly, that was not done in WI, MI PA & GA.

So are Texas voters harmed if voters in PA et al are subject to unequal treatment resulting in a tainted set of electors being named ? I would say yes.

I saw at least a half dozen law professors on several channels tonight who thought that this was a much stronger case than the Kelly PA case.

The more you try, the less and less credible you appear. Your hate clouds you.

Article 2 Section 1

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

Does anybody see where the legislature has sole power in setting up elections for a President in this Article? Is the word election even in this article or the word vote, or does there even have to be a vote of the people?

The legislature shall appoint people to do the Job of electors.

If the whole election was to be decided by pa results, and pa gov did something so egregious and fraudulent to alter the results. Then absolutely other states and citizens were harmed.

I'd suggest watching jay sekulow's show and mark levin's show.

And putting some of the continual goofs on here, on ignore.

The republicans or thier agents have made little progress towards changing the outcome of this election. Every few days people glob on to the new white hope and almost every time it is a knockout. Why in heavens name would people believe it will be different this time when the odds are getting worse every day?

What was Einstiens definition of insanity?

Cannot speak for any one but myself, but I will never give up or quit! Up until the suits reached the Supreme Court none really mattered except for getting evidence gathered. Only a definitive Supreme Court decision might be adequate to head off a major physical collision down the road and we have NOT gotten such a decision. Yesterdays opinion did not even reject the PA case, just announced that they decided not to look at it as an emergency. Who knows with the Texas suit. What is odd to me is that you would think that surrender is the correct option. French much??

I am not surrendering. I don't care for either candidate.

I do hope all this nonsense does not cause the Republicans to lose those two Senate seats in GA.

Some on here are foolish for not wanting to get to the real truth.

Yep

If anything it will ensure a win by invigorating the base.

While it will anger the Abrams fraud machine and cause them to try to turn out as well we are on to them now and I guarantee every polling place and counting room will have us watching like a hawk.

Saw where Elon Musk is moving from CA to Texas. Smart man!

True what do you know?

Really?

You know how hectic traffic already is here? Maybe out to Alpine.

Biden should want this investigated to prove he won fair and square. Otherwise, him talking about uniting the nation will never happen, if that's what he really wants.

17 States have now joined the fight.
If you want to read the official brief

https://www.supremecourt.gov/Docket...et%20al.%20-%20Final%20with%20Tables.pdf

Nice

Just heard Bill O' Reilly on the radio saying that the supremes would not overturn the election based on this case. He said he was so confident he would bet against the supremes overturning the election on this case. Apparently he is taking bets like Jim.

They wouldn't be overturning an election. They'd simply be following the allowed for procedures, where once an election can't be certified, a house vote occurs.

That is NOT overturning an election. That's an election by different, and constitutionally consistent means.

Overturning an election couldn't happen until after inauguration... Once a new elector is in power to overturn.