Did the "Second Amendment Preservation Act" in Missouri ever make it into law?

I know this bill was being voted on last year, but I was wondering if it ever passed. Here is what it says:" SCS/SB 588 - This act establishes the "Second Amendment Preservation Act." Under this act, all federal laws that infringe on the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid and shall not be enforced by this state."

time to decide that you will defend your rights yourself and not count on one government keeping another government at bay..

Strikes me as superfluous and in some cases unenforceable.

The federal courts are the deciders of the scope of the Second Amendment. If the federal courts uphold the banning of ARs by federal statute, the residents of Missouri won't be granted an exemption by virtue of their own state legislation.

Jim

The media is setting us up already trying to paint us as a violent mob based on what happened in DC a few days ago. The crap on FB by the alphabet outlets has been relentless. They smell blood in the water and they are going for the kill, there's no question about it. These guys are going to make Obama seem like he was a moderate.

President-elect Joe Biden will be inaugurated in the same spot where insurrectionists waged an assault on the U.S. Capitol just weeks before. Scott Pelley reports on how officials are ensuring the inauguration will be safe.

CBS News on FB. It's been constant.

I wonder if England granted an exemption to the citizens of the colonies soo they could revolt?

We won't need anyone's permission or approval.

These "news" folks are disgusting liars.

Here's another from CBS.

Bill Whitaker speaks with one of the three law enforcement officials who resigned in the wake of the attack on the Capitol, and reports on the threat behind what one expert says "may have been the most predictable terrorist incident in modern American history."

James,

Explain something to me. Many states have made elicit drugs legal in their states. Although those same drugs are still deemed illegal by the federal Gov. Yet you said above that a state can't overide the fed. gov. on a gun issue. Why one and not the other.

It is not just drugs either. Several other practices, so to speak, can be done by states, but not others.

Not looking for a fight, just curious as to how this can be.

Hopefully you have a legislature that will pass that.

I think some of you are misreading or misunderstanding the language above.

Note that it says " federdal laws that infringe on the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article I, Section 23 of the Missouri Constitution shall be invalid and shall not be enforced by this state."

It does not say 'will not be enforced IN this state'

...in other words, when the Red Dawn military comes for your guns, it's over!

Only because the federal government has chosen not to enforce federal law. They could kick down the doors of every "legal" medical marijuana distribution center if they decided to.

There you go, Word up Marty.

Right. The feds haven't been enforcing the marijuana prohibition in states that have legalized, for political reasons, I guess.

Jim

Show Me!

Edit-think hard on this one James?

That's likely the case. I also think that perhaps federal manpower isn't up to the task. Hard to make a dent if local/state LE aren't going to.pitch in. I don't know how many DEA doorkickers there are... But there are only about 3000 ATF agents. And only a certain percentage of them are "field" personnel... The rest are tech guys, paper pushers, and managers/policy.

I was on a forum where a CLEET instructor stated that almost all of the "bottom of the barrel" graduates went to ATF... He said it was just about like clockwork which agency they would choose to apply to.

Mike