Good morning counsellor.
Your question is leading the witness sir.

For the record, (speaking into the microphone) I don't side with those who label you on this forum.

Those aren't leading questions, Mark. Take the ball and run with it.

Jim

James,
We love you but that noun "going" implies you're expecting and I can't debate with ya too long today because studies call sir.

I do like Tommy Edison better than paraffin for illumination though!

Blessings,
Mark

You voted for it, knowing what was coming. Proof enough.

James
Your not on your A game today..... everyone can see you coming from a country mile

I will vote for any wife and dog beater with a pulse.

lol

Our ancestors didnt take up arms till forced into it. In fact it started out as an isolated thing. The British loyalists just kept pushing. I see a lot of parallels. Biden hasn't said much in the last couple weeks about gun confiscation because he is afraid to. That fence in DC wasn't put up because he thinks he really does have a lot of support.

The media is doing its best to portray people who take their rights seriously as extremists. I expect that to continue.

The election fraud will continue also. From the local school board bond issue that passed with very few yes votes ( West Franklin 287 KS ) to rigging key cities in a national election and then saying no evidence.

At what point the pot boils over I don't know but the water is definitely boiling.

I think they would stand in defiance but would not "start" it. I think the left want to goat us into starting it to justify their next move but Im hopefully optimistic that maybe the American people are starting to smell the stinking rat to oppose them in enough #s to find a non-violent solution. But I'm still preparing for multiple out comes.

lol

Perhaps we need to revisit why the founding fathers fought in the first place.
Because they were fed up? Mad? Wanted to be able to write laws to conceal carry or be able to buy ammo?

People are mad at this, that, and the other every day. That can't be "the" reason.

Why'd they fight in the 1st place against the greatest super power of their day with little chance of winning and a real good chance of dying?

I argue freedom to our founders meant something quite different than what we have molded into 250 years later.
But America casts all that out to sea these days because we are a prideful nation after these 2+ centuries of domination.
Our founders stood little chance of winning.
We dare anyone to stop us.
That's quite a spectrum of difference.

Blessings,
Mark

They knew that Rights came from God not government. If/when kings or governments begin to play God and try to take these Rights, it is time to fight and that is what they did.

I think they would, as soon as they started abusing the Constitution.

May your tribe increase J Staton.

Our nation needs much more of these original founding tenets and far less of what we're sold now such as;
"it's a free country."
"I don't care what they do."
"who are you to tell me."
"leave me alone."
and especially labeling others not like us.

We label to ignore.

We pray our Lord assist us.

Blessings,
Mark

Thank you Posco, that was a well put together piece. I figured when I tried to open it, with all the censoring, that it would be worth looking at. Ask your self why dumb arse jimmy wouldn't even consider watching something like that, and actually. get a better perspective on this, but he and about ten others on here just dig in they're heels and spread bs that comes from they're masters mouths. Sickening!

I play this old Dan Seals song quite often as my reminder....

James, your village is looking for you.

Seems I remember AOC leading a group of around 200 protesters to Pelosi's office with little said about it.
I ponder why the stark contrast to the last protesters who went to her office????
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alexan...protest-outside-nancy-pelosi-office/#app

Could it be because the last ones were pro-gun ?

The founders would have taken action long ago.
I believe when they saw people making a full time living as a “career politician” they would have immediately seen the incumbent danger and revised things.
They’ve given we of the future the power of change and jurisdiction over the fed but none seem to want to apply it.

Osky