If I only had a bump stock this wouldn’t be happening.

Let it go, dude. You've made the point a million times. We get it.

The good news is Uncle Joe isn’t tweeting hurtful words.

I wish I could say he hasn’t grabbed anyone inappropriately, but that ship sailed.

With the latest trend, will we have African Americans doing commercials about how important it is to turn in your firearms?

Dont see that happening, however I could imagine a commercial with BC, James and the goose doing a spot on the common good of "relaxing the 2A, you know, for the greater good."

Are you daft, man? Do you pay any attention to what I say? I challenge you to show where I've ever said anything against the 2a, it where I've even implied that I'd support "relaxing the 2A you know,for the greater good". If you can't show where I've done that, admit you just don't like me because I spoke poorly of your false god Trump.

Loosegoose, its real simple. TMan is chock full of people who for reasons known only to them, believe "commonsense gun control" is not an oxymoron. They are timid little creatures at heart. Think that things like the National Firearms Act, Insta Check, Stop and Frisk, Warrantless Searches, felons Losing their rights after release, make the world a better place. When Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden says it, why then its bad. They belong to the enemy tribe. Blind Big R supporters run around crying freedom and liberty and blindly support candidates who are against those things.

Candidates can say anything. Its what they do that matters.

BTW warrantless search's are tolerated only because people believe that the war on drugs is a good thing, and people need permission to be armed. Drugs and guns. The only two things ever looked for in warrantless searches.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people
to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to
be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Those things were not written for lawyers to destroy

You're confused. You could waste your day looking for threads where I advocated for any gun restrictions. You won't find them. Instead, I am the one advocating for zero gun restrictions and for holding ALL politicians to the 2A regardless of party or cult.

Seriously some of you guys need new material.

Loosegoose--I just saw your post. Same.

Apparently embarrassing your self doesn't bother liberals.

Biden is a puppet.

One more time , When you advocate for a political party that OPENLY says it is coming for your GUNS , YOU are part of the problem.

Lol. This guy.

Why is it with certain people, if you don't toe the Big R line, their only repsonse is "YoU mUsT bE a LiBeRaL dEmOcRaT LOL lol LOL lol!"

Agreed 100%.....so show where I advocated for that party. Seriously, go ahead. I'll wait. Show where I've ever shown support for the democrat party.

And by the way, showing disdain for the republican party isn't the same as showing support for the democrat party.

Because CERTAIN people are a little upset at other certain people for enabling certain people for to get elected that are not so good for our rights.

Many of them aren't even Big R's. They cheer for big government and stimulus checks while parroting back whatever they have been told to think by their leader or his news/YouTube channels.

One more time, you had two real choices in the last election cycle, There was no perfect choice, one choice was as pro-gun as an administration has been ever, not perfect, only danny would have been, and another that openly said it was commin for your guns..................... why do I try?

Yeah, I've never advocated for Biden or any Democrat.

New material, please.

People are taught by our media masters that there are only two parties. So even people who support individual liberty choose R or D when the reality is they are not that far apart

both RULE by executive order

both want unarmed subjects, not free individuals

both spend tax dollars like drunk sailors in a Thai brothel

both think its a crime to operate a business so a license is demanded

both claim people do not own property. rent must be paid. use of property is with government permission only

free markets are a bad thing

both claim people who earn money have an obligation to hand that money over to the government, thegovernment can then give it to people who dont want to earn.