No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: Called my congressman [Re: danny clifton] #7239296
04/09/21 05:55 PM
04/09/21 05:55 PM

J
J Staton
Unregistered
J Staton
Unregistered
J



Originally Posted by danny clifton
BTW warrantless search's are tolerated only because people believe that the war on drugs is a good thing, and people need permission to be armed. Drugs and guns. The only two things ever looked for in warrantless searches.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people
to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to
be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Those things were not written for lawyers to destroy

Define unreasonable.

Re: Called my congressman [Re: hippie] #7239372
04/09/21 07:56 PM
04/09/21 07:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,947
2A Sanctuaries-W. OK & N. NM
Blaine County Offline
trapper
Blaine County  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,947
2A Sanctuaries-W. OK & N. NM
Originally Posted by hippie
I'm now with Danny, B.C. and Looser!!

GO JOE GO!!!!!!!
I'm glad he finally got around to setting up a commission to pack the SCOTUS! I was worried he wouldn't. Hope he puts at least 6 more on, all gun grabbers.

I'm also glad he isn't stopping at just the orders he signed yesterday, Trump didn't sign enough so hopefully he signs some for Trump too. All we need is a shotgun to hunt with anyhow, right?


Bunch of idiots.


You're not with me. You support welfare, gun control and wasteful government spending.

And you voted for Bill Clinton. Twice.

Re: Called my congressman [Re: danny clifton] #7239375
04/09/21 08:03 PM
04/09/21 08:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,880
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline OP
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline OP
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,880
williamsburg ks
unreasonable is warrantless. judges are to decide if LE has reason to search.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Called my congressman [Re: danny clifton] #7239526
04/09/21 10:22 PM
04/09/21 10:22 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,414
Idaho Falls, Idaho
F
Furvor Offline
trapper
Furvor  Offline
trapper
F

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,414
Idaho Falls, Idaho
And a president is not a king.

Re: Called my congressman [Re: loosegoose] #7239951
04/10/21 12:41 PM
04/10/21 12:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,524
Wi.
D
Diggerman Offline
trapper
Diggerman  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 6,524
Wi.
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Originally Posted by Diggerman

One more time, you had two real choices in the last election cycle, There was no perfect choice, one choice was as pro-gun as an administration has been ever, not perfect, only danny would have been, and another that openly said it was commin for your guns..................... why do I try?

Ah. So pick the side that wants to take away your freedom a little at a time instead of all at once? No thanks, I don't compromise. I don't buy the "lesser of two evils" argument. If you're willing to compromise and have your rights whittled away a little at a time, that's your choice I guess, it's not for me though.

One more try; You are in need of a new fence, You get three quotes, Republican quotes you 500$, Democrat quotes you 5000$, Libertarian will do it for free, just will never do it. This is not compromising, we are starting with what we have today, and trying to make it better. Only a delusional person would think he could wave a magic wand and go back to the 1800s laws.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread