Remember when the last president said he didn't like silencers? I don't remember any republicans getting too upset then. But it's (D)ifferent this time, I guess.

Looks like there will be a run on solvent traps.

Morons.

most of the gun hating world requires a gun muffler to hunt so you don't make too much noise , in the US where all of about zero crime happens with a suppressor. they want a total ban becuase why keeping your hearing or making less of a noise is bad.

cars , trucks motorcycles , lawn mowers everything has a muffler mandated


this is people who haven't a clue trying to decide things they don't know about

if there a difference between 129 decibels and 160 decibels absolutely , can you tell me what is what from the next room without me playing one then the other probably not.

the movies make it sound like a loud fart , it is more like a less loud bang

the exception being sub sonic 22lr and a few other sub sonic cartridges with suppressors however a long barrel and fast burning powder can do almost the same thing.


I though these laws were supposed to be in the interest of public safety , for pete's sake more people die from being stuck by lightning than die from suppressor use , how ridiculous.

I would bet the ban clan has nothing to back up a need for such action just the scary thing that must be banned.

But what did he do? Nothing. Maybe his rhetoric was just to try to stay some fence sitters.

You and your ilk got what you wanted! Orange man out, and people like yourself have left the void to be filled by cockroaches. Don’t stand on your pulpit and dare blame anyone but yourself.

Maybe we should ban subwoofers in autos as an alternative. Turning all the younger crowd into jelly heads.

I didn't get what I wanted. I wanted a president that would fight all gun laws. Neither of the two major party candidates was willing to do that.

This is what I was thinking...TDS! ^^^^^

Lol you wish. Keep ignoring gun control from your side, and wondering why the other side punches so hard side it.

Whose side is whose? Either your American or you’re not? Every person in the country loses when any kind of infringement is made upon people to pass a law to ban you from using something and mandating a buyback, or even worse, being able to speak and state their opinions openly. Obviously I do not support silencer bans. I see their purpose for hunting, especially predators, and for target practice, keeping noise down in general.

AGAIN? Sigh...

[quote=Swamp Wolf]This is what I was thinking...TDS! ^^^^
[quote I will second that .

The troll's sure get a thread off track quick on this forum......some statement made by Trump somehow compares to a bill that is introduced, which is absurd, and then the thread is done for as far as its original content...

Dipstick jimmy some6times gets pages of bs from one of his dipstick comments.

I have idiots like the Goose on ignore and wish that I did not see their moronic drivel in the quotes of other folks. They bring out the angry in me and I don't like that at all.

who's your dream guy?

Anyone who believes in real liberty and freedom. I voted libertarian in the last election, and constitution party in 2016.

Well truth be told Big R DID say suppressors would be taken off the NFA list during the 2016 campaign. That and national carry just drifted away like smoke in a 30 MPH wind.

I will do what i can to oppose further restrictions on suppressors, but honestly, is a 200 dollar tax and a permission slip really any better????????????????

give us a name.

who should we support, goose?

FIFY.

And that was helpful.

give us a name ? how about Peewee Herman

Loosegoose does the Constitution party run any candidates for state offices in NE? That's one party I would get behind. Of course I believe it should be developed on the state level, actually having candidates elected, before jumping into the big league of federal elections.

The Constitution party has a better platform, but their guy in 2020 had too much baggage. Libertarian party has more name recognition, though. We'll see who they put out in 2024. Darrell Castle is a good guy.

no go..."open borders"

Have to elect constitutional democrats, even if YOU have to become that person.

we have open borders now. we also have welfare. end welfare (libertarian platform)and the migrant swarms wont be a problem


the open border policy could also be changed.


its not your fault big r let everyone down

you and I both know ending welfare won't happen. Ever.

(It's kind of like the R's plank that they want to end deficit spending...pablum for the "[dumb] masses".)

Kids toys that make noise should be banned too.

There's reality and there's wishful thinking.

A lot of libertarians have a problem with that part of the libertarian.platform. the libertarian platform is also pro-choice, even though most libertarians are pro-life. That's why I said the Constitution party has better platform. They're super pro-life,and support an end to all immigration until the mess is sorted out.

On the subject of the 2a, both libertarian and constitution parties say that all gun laws are an infringement, which is something neither the democratic or republican parties support.

Welfare as we know it will end before the borders become closed as you put it.

But see, that was the good thing about Trump. Maybe personally he didn't like silencers. But he recognized that just because he didn't care for them didn't mean they had to be banned. He made no effort to ban silencers, despite not liking them.

see, that's the problem with your stance...

on one hand, you rail against the R's because they aren't in lock-step with all of your views.

but you voted for Libertarians, even though they aren't in lock-step with all of your views...

Are republicans in lockstep with your views?

I don't need a party that aligns perfectly with me, but I need one that aligns a lot better that democrats or republicans. On the issue of the 2a at least (the subject of this thread), both the libertarian party and the Constitution party align perfectly with my views, which is that all gun control laws are unconstitutional. Neither the republican or democrat party shares that view, both parties are comfortable with some level of gun control,and both of their candidates in the last election had a history of pro.otingfun control. That's too much for me.

And neither will ever do squat , surely that comes into play somewhere?

Those parties aren't serious about getting anyone elected.

like it or not, absolutists of ANY stripe aren't likely to win very many elections.

and if you don't win elections, your views don't matter all that much...they won't be implemented.

They will put the my pillow guy out of buisness if they find out a pillow makes a good supressor.

They will put the my pillow guy out of buisness if they find out a pillow makes a good supressor.