No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
Pretty interesting stuff, i know recently James mentioned in another thread there has been no evidence of election fraud. I’m gonna try and keep this non political, it’s more in the constitutional category in my opinion.
What makes that bug-eyed weirdo an expert on anything?
I watched part of it, but don't have twenty minutes to spend with him and his ignorant opinions. He thinks judges have to hear every case by the Constitution.
Can someone tell me where he offers any evidence?
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
What makes that bug-eyed weirdo an expert on anything?
I watched part of it, but don't have twenty minutes to spend with him and his ignorant opinions. He thinks judges have to hear every case by the Constitution.
Can someone tell me where he offers any evidence?
Jim
Why is it that when you cannot refute what he says, you resort to calling him names? Pretty childish.
What makes that bug-eyed weirdo an expert on anything?
I watched part of it, but don't have twenty minutes to spend with him and his ignorant opinions. He thinks judges have to hear every case by the Constitution.
Can someone tell me where he offers any evidence?
Jim
Why is it that when you cannot refute what he says, you resort to calling him names? Pretty childish.
What makes that bug-eyed weirdo an expert on anything?
I watched part of it, but don't have twenty minutes to spend with him and his ignorant opinions. He thinks judges have to hear every case by the Constitution.
Can someone tell me where he offers any evidence?
Jim
Why is it that when you cannot refute what he says, you resort to calling him names? Pretty childish.
That is kind of funny. When people call James names he said it is because they can't prove him wrong. Another case of James having two sets of standards. Maybe some of James supporters via PM can explain why he plays by two sets of standards. Surely it couldn't be that someone as intelligent could be bias. Lol
What makes that bug-eyed weirdo an expert on anything?
I watched part of it, but don't have twenty minutes to spend with him and his ignorant opinions. He thinks judges have to hear every case by the Constitution.
Can someone tell me where he offers any evidence?
Jim
Why is it that when you cannot refute what he says, you resort to calling him names? Pretty childish.
Well not that I care for James, but people call him names too. Like Jimbo, Jimmy, and the tick. LOL.
I watched part of it, saw a lot of commentary and no evidence, until he made his ignorant statement about the Constitution and the courts, and then I quit watching.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
I watched part of it, saw a lot of commentary and no evidence, until he made his ignorant statement about the Constitution and the courts, and then I quit watching.
Jim
It's always best to not listen to all the testimony before making an informed decision. I will keep that in mind going forward.
You have done a great job of ignoring what real people have seen and experienced during the past election cycle. I, personally, witnessed and exposed to local voting judges, several illegal votes being caste by minors and non-citizens of this country. You can bury your head in the sand and assume everything is happening by the book, or, you can have an open mind and question why a large population of folks disagree with your assumption, to agree with the status quo.
