I have been wondering this especially in the case of Justice Roberts. Big tech companies can easily find dirt on theses individuals or their families. I also can not help think the Supreme Court has had “persuasion” techniques used by powerful liberals. After they refused to hear any cases concerning the fraud in last years election, it sure makes me wonder. I’ll even suspect this more if the court rules in favor of the gun control people in the New York Second Amendment case coming this fall.

That's quite the conspiracy theory.

It's the men in black. They found out his dog is an alien.

certainly not PROVEN; but if you want to discuss...

look up Roberts' questions during ObamaCare's hearing and compare those with his tortured, UnConstitutional (on it's face) "logic" declaring it to be a "tax"...keeping in mind that tax legislation has to be introduced via the House, not the Senate.

yeah, the Deep State got him.

John Roberts was appointed by bush, who wasn't really a conservative, so Roberts was suspect from the start.

Bush was a pretty good president overall, and he did an awesome job handling 9/11. But the Patriot act, endless war against an endless enemy, and gobs and gobs of spending aren't the mark of a conservative. Therefore any judge he nominated should be suspect.

I don't think that's far from the truth. In more ways than one...

Probably always had the fence in his crotch.

I despise bizarre conspiracy theories. Saying "the deep state got dirt on Roberts" is one of them. Here's an alternate bizarre conspiracy theory......Roberts was always a liberal. Before he was on the supreme court, the conservatives had dirt on him, (that hes a flaming homosexual and was cheating on his wife with two dudes) and made him vote conservative. Bush had no clue about any of this, and so appointed h to the supreme court. Once on the supreme court, Roberts was part of a special guild, and was allowed two free assassinations, complete with identity destruction of the person assassinated. He chose to have assasinated his gay lovers, and their identities were destroyed. Now he's free to vote as he pleases.

The above scenario is just as likely, and has just as much evidence (none) as the conspiracy theory that the deep state is blackmailing him now.

not a big conspiracy theorist, myself.

have you looked up the SCOTUS arguments I referenced for yourself?

Goose,
The sooner you learn that there is in fact a "deep state" , the sooner you understand politics and why certain things happen.

You can look this up......Washington D.C. which is inhabited by thousands and thousands of career ABC agency employees votes between 90-95% democrat.
When Reagan won all 50 states in a landslide, he lost D.C by a large amount. I can't remember without looking, but I think 80% went democrats when the whole country went republican.

many people have been convicted in a court of law for "conspiracy". so, in fact...it exists.

is it proven here? certainly not.

but the difference between his questions in arguments versus his rendered opinion is startling.

This^^^

All the employees of all the alphabet agencies aren't going to vote for smaller government and potentially lose not just a job, but a lucrative benefits/retirement package. They don't care that it costs the taxpayers billions upon billions, they're getting theirs. The rest of us can eat cake.

Government's main concern is growing more government. And they'll print money out of thin air to do it.

That's your swamp/deep state.

Mike

Robert's is compromised and Lin Wood has a sworn affidavit by a whistle blower that can testify to Roberts having spent a little too much time at Epstein Island, and from that, you can surmise that the deep state has him by the nads.

Any one that doesnt believe that the deep state is real, is lost, sheeple type person with their head in the sand.

Is there anything else you all would like to know ?

Yes, it is compromised but not in the sense of extortion. Compromised in the sense of career jurists and the selection process.
Take note of the affiliations of these justices at ALL levels of the federal bench, you'll see one main association of the right leaning justices, The Federalist Society.
While I'm not ascribing ulterior motive and I actually agree with in their claimed beliefs I do question one group having such a strong influence upon the careers and career paths of so many jurists.

Our federal institutions, at least the two elected ones, were never intended to function as permanent status quo institutions. Change was expected to occur with each passing election and change of administration. The judiciary was set up with lifetime appointment to allow it to be held separate from the expectations of change in the other two branches. Yet somehow we now have a permanent bureaucratic class immune from the vagaries of elections and the three true branches have bent their will to the unelected.

I'm well aware of and believe in the swamp/deep state/ beurocracy nightmsre that I'd DC. That doesn't prove that anyone has "dirt" on Roberts.

Both my theory about Roberts being a liberal homosexual and Roberts being blackmailed have the same amount of evidence.....none.

If Roberts defended himself against Lin Wood's allegations, which he wont, because then evidence would surely come out, I believe you would see that extortion is in play, IMO

Roberts was cuddling his 2 boyfriend's that I mentioned on Epsteins island.

You can see a copy of the whistle blower affidavit on Lin Wood's channel on telegram, and the whole world can see it if they want.

Ive had no doubt it's true since Roberts REWROTE obama care to make it legal! I knew then someone had dirt on him.

I feel the court may not be compromised but it sure is now directed strongly to each political spectrum depending upon who is vetting and who is appointing and approving. There is no attempt to have the court be the non political branch of government be that nine members as now, fewer as before or enlarged as some have talked about recently. In the past many times being appointed to the court was an indication that even politicians were believing the appointee would be reviewing cases from an open perspective, in todays world appointees don't get considered unless they have made politically based or biased opinions.

Bryce