No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We #7280046
06/05/21 02:27 PM
06/05/21 02:27 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,160
Golconda, IL
nramemb Offline OP
trapper
nramemb  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,160
Golconda, IL

Last edited by nramemb; 06/05/21 02:28 PM.
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280112
06/05/21 03:57 PM
06/05/21 03:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 16,742
St. Louis Co, Mo
B
BigBob Offline
trapper
BigBob  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 16,742
St. Louis Co, Mo
WAHOO!!!!!


Every kid needs a Dog and a Curmudgeon.

Remember Bowe Bergdahl, the traitor.

Beware! Jill Pudlewski, Ron Oates and Keven Begesse are liars and thiefs!
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280199
06/05/21 06:20 PM
06/05/21 06:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,594
The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane Offline
"HOSS"
Leftlane  Offline
"HOSS"

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,594
The Hill Country of Texas
Good news!


“What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.”
Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers


Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280728
06/06/21 12:00 PM
06/06/21 12:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,630
Fairbanks, Alaska
Pete in Frbks Offline
trapper
Pete in Frbks  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,630
Fairbanks, Alaska
Now we are getting somewhere!

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280742
06/06/21 12:29 PM
06/06/21 12:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,509
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,509
pa
I heard the libs don't want them to appeal it for fear it would go to the SCOTUS and if the SCOTUS upheld the ruling, all states would have to abide by it.

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280767
06/06/21 01:43 PM
06/06/21 01:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31,797
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31,797
McGrath, AK
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level.
Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case


Mean As Nails
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280811
06/06/21 03:06 PM
06/06/21 03:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 14,072
North East Kansas
Marty Online happy
trapper
Marty  Online Happy
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 14,072
North East Kansas
everything today is maneuvered 'within the rules' so it goes how the progressives want it to go....court decisions, elections, laws and the list goes on...


"He who is forged in fire, wont get his butt scorched under the sun"
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: Marty] #7280834
06/06/21 04:26 PM
06/06/21 04:26 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 416
Paris, Arkansas
Dawg Catcher Offline
trapper
Dawg Catcher  Offline
trapper

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 416
Paris, Arkansas
Originally Posted by Marty
everything today is maneuvered 'within the rules' so it goes how the progressives want it to go....court decisions, elections, laws and the list goes on...


Yes Sir..


The Steel Toe Two Step.

Steve Cullison

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280908
06/06/21 07:07 PM
06/06/21 07:07 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,594
The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane Offline
"HOSS"
Leftlane  Offline
"HOSS"

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,594
The Hill Country of Texas
Maneuvers or not if I feel infringed the offending law should be scrapped.

.I approve of this message


“What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.”
Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers


Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280937
06/06/21 07:56 PM
06/06/21 07:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,594
The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane Offline
"HOSS"
Leftlane  Offline
"HOSS"

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 12,594
The Hill Country of Texas
To even try to understand a liberals definition of an assault rifle is near impossible

Last edited by Leftlane; 06/06/21 08:00 PM.

“What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.”
Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers


Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7280958
06/06/21 08:37 PM
06/06/21 08:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,386
Anchorage, Alaska
J
James Offline
"Minka"
James  Offline
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,386
Anchorage, Alaska
Great news!

I knew those donations would help.

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: James] #7280959
06/06/21 08:39 PM
06/06/21 08:39 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,188
Iowa
T
trapdog1 Offline
trapper
trapdog1  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 4,188
Iowa
Originally Posted by James
Great news!

I knew those donations would help.

Jim


grin

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: white17] #7281269
06/07/21 11:08 AM
06/07/21 11:08 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,630
Fairbanks, Alaska
Pete in Frbks Offline
trapper
Pete in Frbks  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,630
Fairbanks, Alaska
Originally Posted by white17
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level.
Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case


Well, aren't we just overly positive and optimistic today.....!

Pete

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7281273
06/07/21 11:13 AM
06/07/21 11:13 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31,797
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31,797
McGrath, AK
grin

I think "realistic" is a better term


Mean As Nails
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7281277
06/07/21 11:17 AM
06/07/21 11:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,630
Fairbanks, Alaska
Pete in Frbks Offline
trapper
Pete in Frbks  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,630
Fairbanks, Alaska
grin

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: white17] #7281289
06/07/21 12:06 PM
06/07/21 12:06 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,968
Alaska and Washington State
W
waggler Offline
trapper
waggler  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,968
Alaska and Washington State
Originally Posted by white17
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level.
Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case

I'm curious why you don't think that SCOTUS will take up this case; especially considering the current makeup of the court. I would assume that if the majority are contructionists, they would want to address this before the Court might be changed by court packing.


My life is better than your vacation
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: waggler] #7281299
06/07/21 12:30 PM
06/07/21 12:30 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31,797
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 31,797
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by waggler
Originally Posted by white17
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level.
Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case

I'm curious why you don't think that SCOTUS will take up this case; especially considering the current makeup of the court. I would assume that if the majority are contructionists, they would want to address this before the Court might be changed by court packing.


A couple of reasons.

First, before it can get to SCOTUS there needs to be two or more conflicting decisions from the appellate level. Let's assume that the 9th circuit smacks down the lower court's decision. Then the plaintiffs could appeal to SCOTUS. But 2A cases have been rejected for the past ten years because the strict constuctionists on the court could not trust that Roberts would not betray them. So they might not hear this challenge to CA law. I don't really think that calculus has changed very much. We sure can't count on Roberts and I'm not convinced about Kavanaugh either.

But if the 9th supports the lower court AND for instance IL or NY pass a similar law, and IF it was challenged up to the circuit level, and IF that different circuit found against IL/NY now you have two opposing decisions on the same issue, from two different appellate courts.

I think SCOTUS would be more likely to consider hearing that case..............but it would take several years to get to that point.

The best that we can reasonably hope for is that the 9th circuit will uphold the lower court's decision. I will be very surprised if that happens.

CA may not appeal that decision if they fear that SCOTUS will rule against them. A decision like that would apply to the entire country rather than only those states covered by the 9th circuit. Democrats do not want that outcome.


Mean As Nails
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: nramemb] #7281313
06/07/21 12:54 PM
06/07/21 12:54 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,509
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 12,509
pa
Exactly what I had read White. They don't want it appealed because with Trumps remake of the 9th questions their ruling and even if they reverse it and its appealed to SCOTUS, they feel they'll lose.

Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled, but I'm love'n it!!!

Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: hippie] #7281323
06/07/21 01:24 PM
06/07/21 01:24 PM
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,968
Alaska and Washington State
W
waggler Offline
trapper
waggler  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,968
Alaska and Washington State
Originally Posted by hippie
Exactly what I had read White. They don't want it appealed because with Trumps remake of the 9th questions their ruling and even if they reverse it and its appealed to SCOTUS, they feel they'll lose.

Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled, but I'm love'n it!!!

"Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled"; Really?
Libs in generally don't like to work, or do anything else productive; that requires effort and thought. The process of selecting judges (not just yapping about the nominee) takes time and effort. This time their laziness bit them in the butt. I'm love'n it too.


My life is better than your vacation
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We [Re: hippie] #7281327
06/07/21 01:32 PM
06/07/21 01:32 PM
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,420
Finally run aground in TN
Scuba1 Offline
"color blind Kraut"
Scuba1  Offline
"color blind Kraut"

Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 10,420
Finally run aground in TN
Originally Posted by hippie
Exactly what I had read White. They don't want it appealed because with Trumps remake of the 9th questions their ruling and even if they reverse it and its appealed to SCOTUS, they feel they'll lose.

Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled, but I'm love'n it!!!


Well O bummer thought he would leave that chore to Hilderbeast when she takes office. They never thought that Trump would win.


I do all my own stunts ..... but never intentionally
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread