Bs Wisconsin wolf article - Trapperman Forums

No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter

Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum

~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~

Minnesota Trapline Products

Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products

Register Log In Home Forums Trapper Talk Bs Wisconsin wolf article

Print Thread

Hop To

Bs Wisconsin wolf article #7302954 07/10/21 07:21 AM 07/10/21 07:21 AM
Joined: Feb 2012 Posts: 1,881 Northeast Wisconsin N NE Wildlife OP trapper
NE Wildlife OP trapper N Joined: Feb 2012 Posts: 1,881 Northeast Wisconsin	https://www.nationalgeographic.com/...f-hunt-killed-one-third-state-population I don’t comprehend the minds of some people, I’m also surprised National Geographic would Print a story with so many blatant lies in it.

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7302962 07/10/21 07:25 AM 07/10/21 07:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 7,174 Three Lakes,WI 72 C corky trapper
corky trapper C Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 7,174 Three Lakes,WI 72	If only it were true. Our local TV station regurgitated this garbage. Most locals just laugh at the idiocy but I'm sure the tourists and people in urban areas believe it. http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7302978 07/10/21 08:02 AM 07/10/21 08:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2018 Posts: 5,570 Dunbar, Wisconsin P Pike River trapper
Pike River trapper P Joined: Oct 2018 Posts: 5,570 Dunbar, Wisconsin	What BS..... How long was the season? Few days? Sorry but no way did a 1/3 of the wolf population was taken. Whats more than likely is that the population is severely under reported.

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7302981 07/10/21 08:07 AM 07/10/21 08:07 AM
Joined: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,009 Wisconsin 8117 Steve R trapper
8117 Steve R trapper Joined: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,009 Wisconsin	National Geographic has been publishing bs stories for some time now. Its only when you are close to a situation you realize that they are bs stories. Steve WTA NRA

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303096 07/10/21 11:38 AM 07/10/21 11:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 6,340 se South Dakota NonPCfed trapper
NonPCfed trapper Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 6,340 se South Dakota	I think I've told this story before but when Wild About Trapping was going, there was a Wisconsin guy that would take a couple of weeks off to go after coyotes. He never really said where in the state he trapped, but I'm thinking it was north-central. Anyway, he and his nephew used to have cool wolf releases videos. His percentage of wolf vs yote catches continued to increase over the 2-3 years he reported. The last year, I think it was maybe 2015, he caught 19 canines and 5 of them were wolf for an over 25% wolf ratio. In one of his release videos, he was pretty sure the wolf they were releasing (a female) he had caught as a yoy the year before (some coloration pattern had caught his eye). I would think that a 25% wolf to coyote yield would be considered a high wolf population... "And God said, Let us make man in our image ï¿½and let them have dominion ï¿½and all the creatures that move along the ground". Genesis 1:26

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NonPCfed] #7303098 07/10/21 11:41 AM 07/10/21 11:41 AM
Joined: Oct 2018 Posts: 5,570 Dunbar, Wisconsin P Pike River trapper
Pike River trapper P Joined: Oct 2018 Posts: 5,570 Dunbar, Wisconsin	Originally Posted by NonPCfed I think I've told this story before but when Wild About Trapping was going, there was a Wisconsin guy that would take a couple of weeks off to go after coyotes. He never really said where in the state he trapped, but I'm thinking it was north-central. Anyway, he and his nephew used to have cool wolf releases videos. His percentage of wolf vs yote catches continued to increase over the 2-3 years he reported. The last year, I think it was maybe 2015, he caught 19 canines and 5 of them were wolf for an over 25% wolf ratio. In one of his release videos, he was pretty sure the wolf they were releasing (a female) he had caught as a yoy the year before (some coloration pattern had caught his eye). I would think that a 25% wolf to coyote yield would be considered a high wolf population... Interesting..... Wolves seem to be smarter and harder to trap than coyotes so with a 25%catch rate i woukd think the wolve coyote ratio is even higher

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303136 07/10/21 01:05 PM 07/10/21 01:05 PM
Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 6,340 se South Dakota NonPCfed trapper
NonPCfed trapper Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 6,340 se South Dakota	You would think... This what happens when wildlife biology becomes overly political. The WI DNR biologists probably know that the wolf pop is more than 600-700 critters but if they came out with more realistic estimates, such as 2,000 animals (just using as an example), then the lefties in state government would suppress that estimate because the majority of Wisconsin residents would probably favor a management program on them. Because PETA and such can raise money from all over the USA, and the world for that matter, and funnel it to Democratic election pac's, the leftie politicos are beholding to that special interest group. The circle goes around and round... "And God said, Let us make man in our image ï¿½and let them have dominion ï¿½and all the creatures that move along the ground". Genesis 1:26

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303170 07/10/21 02:38 PM 07/10/21 02:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,009 Wisconsin 8117 Steve R trapper
8117 Steve R trapper Joined: Oct 2014 Posts: 2,009 Wisconsin	I think wolves are easier than coyotes to trap. I think it is because most of them travel in a pack and there is a race to a baited dirt hole, unlike a coyote who may walk past a few times. Steve WTA NRA

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303231 07/10/21 05:12 PM 07/10/21 05:12 PM
Joined: Mar 2019 Posts: 439 Pottsboro TX Grayson county J Jiggamitch trapper
Jiggamitch trapper J Joined: Mar 2019 Posts: 439 Pottsboro TX Grayson county	Lol aren't these the same people that published the "fireworks are racist" article? Another one serves itself up to the boycott heap.

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303298 07/10/21 07:56 PM 07/10/21 07:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,932 NY R Rat_Pack trapper
Rat_Pack trapper R Joined: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,932 NY	I'm not buying this NG bs

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303310 07/10/21 08:23 PM 07/10/21 08:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 1,058 East Central Wi. coyote addict trapper
coyote addict trapper Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 1,058 East Central Wi.	Here's a headline for the fake news. Wisconsin Wolves : all 12000 female wolves in Wisconsin gave birth to a average litter size of 23 pups. Record birth rate since wolves have been delisted. Member -W.T.A. N.T.A. - N.R. A. A Shotgun. A Rifle and a 4 Wheel Drive.. A Country Boy. Will Survive

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303320 07/10/21 08:31 PM 07/10/21 08:31 PM
Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 18,574 Green County Wisconsin G GREENCOUNTYPETE trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE trapper G Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 18,574 Green County Wisconsin	the DNR they say 1034-1056 Minimum on the 2019 report and 256 packs with 13% growth from the previous year and about 85% of packs observed having pups 218 wolves killed / 1034 = 21% 218 wolves killed / 1056 = 20% at no point is 20 or 21% = to 33.3% the target of 119 wolves = 11% just less than the growth rate , intending to have no impact on the size of the states pack. 1034-1056 is a Minimum number a very conservative number America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: NE Wildlife] #7303377 07/10/21 09:58 PM 07/10/21 09:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 6,340 se South Dakota NonPCfed trapper
NonPCfed trapper Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 6,340 se South Dakota	Thanks GreenCountyPete! So where do you think the NatGeo losers got the "650" number...? Maybe you should send them an e-mail linking this report? Then again, it won't make a difference. It doesn't fit their narrative... "And God said, Let us make man in our image ï¿½and let them have dominion ï¿½and all the creatures that move along the ground". Genesis 1:26

Re: Bs Wisconsin wolf article [Re: Jiggamitch] #7303381 07/10/21 10:06 PM 07/10/21 10:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20,337 The Hill Country of Texas Leftlane "HOSS"
Leftlane "HOSS" Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20,337 The Hill Country of Texas	Originally Posted by Jiggamitch Lol aren't these the same people that published the "fireworks are racist" article? Another one serves itself up to the boycott heap. x2 “What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.” Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers

Moderated by 330-Trapper, Bogmaster, Cindy, cotton, Drifter, Maddog47, Paul Dobbins, USMC47 🦫, Wolfdog91

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1