|
Re: Picture Quality of Trapper Magazine.
[Re: martyd]
#7353237
09/11/21 04:16 PM
09/11/21 04:16 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,120 Northern Wisconsin,Rhinelander
Hodagtrapper
Muskrat Master
|
Muskrat Master
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,120
Northern Wisconsin,Rhinelander
|
Looking at it just now I would say the picture quality is average to slightly below average. Type legibility seems okay. Some good articles and I like the new direction taken by The Trapper in going back to their roots.
Chris
>>In God we trust<<
|
|
|
Re: Picture Quality of Trapper Magazine.
[Re: martyd]
#7353608
09/12/21 03:26 AM
09/12/21 03:26 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,193 IA, WI, ND, IL
martyd
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,193
IA, WI, ND, IL
|
Ok. Maybe I just got one that had bad printing. I have been a subscriber since 1975 or 1976. Or What ever year it was first published. Also have been a subscriber to Fur-fish and Game since 1975. Should have kept all the magazines. Couple years ago editor of trapper sent me a thank you for being with them so long. It is a great magazine. *** follow up , who is the new owners ? Marty
Last edited by martyd; 09/12/21 03:28 AM.
|
|
|
Re: Picture Quality of Trapper Magazine.
[Re: martyd]
#7353745
09/12/21 09:12 AM
09/12/21 09:12 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21,385 Alabama (Bama for short) 108 y...
Jtrapper
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 21,385
Alabama (Bama for short) 108 y...
|
Whoever began putting articles on paper with dark colored back grounds needs to be shot, i can't read them! Several of the mag's do this now days, guess it's what is in style but for us 'older' guys with failing eye sight it ruins the whole magazine for us, not worth getting if can't read what's in it.
Most i imagine are struggling for pictures/articles these days.
Not my circus, not my clowns.
|
|
|
|
|
|