No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7355762
09/14/21 07:35 PM
09/14/21 07:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,882
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,882
williamsburg ks
There is nothing all laid out in revelation. 100 people will read it and come away with 100 different interpretations. Just like every good prophecy. Get explicit and prophecy falls apart.

I was taught the trinity, father son and holy ghost, are like water ice and steam. Different manifestations of the same creator


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7355765
09/14/21 07:40 PM
09/14/21 07:40 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 180
Utah
J
Jasper69 Offline
trapper
Jasper69  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 180
Utah
James, one way to find out if you should accept it. Pray and ponder. But it must be done with a pure intent of heart. And it might take awhile. But if you have true desire you will get an answer and be at peace. It just might not be on your time or in your own way.

Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7355781
09/14/21 07:57 PM
09/14/21 07:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,497
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,497
PA
The majority of believers in Christian history didn't believe in a rapture. ( I'm ducking because I assume somebody's going to throw something at me)
I know it's a very common belief now, but it actually has very little biblical support.

Catholics don't officially believe in the rapture, neither do lutherans and Angelicans, and some Calvinists.
I'm not saying either way, just clarifying that one doesn't have to accept rapture theology to be a Christian.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: amspoker] #7355813
09/14/21 08:26 PM
09/14/21 08:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,650
Southeast Ohio
amspoker Offline
trapper
amspoker  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,650
Southeast Ohio
Originally Posted by danny clifton
There is nothing all laid out in revelation. 100 people will read it and come away with 100 different interpretations. Just like every good prophecy. Get explicit and prophecy falls apart.

I was taught the trinity, father son and holy ghost, are like water ice and steam. Different manifestations of the same creator




10And the disciples came and said to Him, “Why do You speak to them in parables?”

11He answered and said to them, “Because it has been given to you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given.

12For whoever has, to him more will be given, and he will have abundance; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him.

13Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.

14And in them the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled, which says: ‘Hearing you will hear and shall not understand, And seeing you will see and not perceive;


15For the hearts of this people have grown dull. Their ears are hard of hearing, And their eyes they have closed, Lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, Lest they should understand with their hearts and turn, So that I [b]should heal them.’


16But blessed are your eyes for they see, and your ears for they hear;

17for assuredly, I say to you that many prophets and righteous men desired to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.

[And also keep in mind..]



1My little children, these things I write to you, so that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous.

2And He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world
.


Levi
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7355824
09/14/21 08:41 PM
09/14/21 08:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,650
Southeast Ohio
amspoker Offline
trapper
amspoker  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 3,650
Southeast Ohio
There are over two-hundred references to the old testament in Revelation.

You have to let the Bible interpret the Bible.

I don't have it figured out yet.

Working on it.


Levi
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7355883
09/14/21 09:30 PM
09/14/21 09:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,144
Ohio
BuckMink Offline
trapper
BuckMink  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,144
Ohio
James,

May I ask why you fear man, but not God himself as your judge?

Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7355925
09/14/21 10:10 PM
09/14/21 10:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
J
James Offline OP
"Minka"
James  Offline OP
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
I think God would more likely be fair, impartial, and just. I've seen human judges make decisions out of their feelings, bias, or dislike of a particular lawyer or party.

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: yotetrapper30] #7356349
09/15/21 01:55 PM
09/15/21 01:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,718
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,718
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by yotetrapper30
Originally Posted by James
Yotetrapper, your interpretation is plausible, but not inevitable. Other interpretations are possible. I'd like to hear what Mark thinks of yours.

I never knew that most people, even most Christians, believe the Rapture has already happened. My Christian parents, son, and daughter-in-law don't believe that.

What does surviving "tribulation" mean? Is tribulation the same as the Rapture? Have I survived tribulation, and if so, how, since I'm not a Christian?

Jim


No, Jim, I mean by "this point (Chapter 20) in Revelation", not right now. Many if not most Bible scholars believe the Rapture occurs before the 7 year tribulation period begins. All believers will be raptured to Heaven. Just before or after that, a peace treaty will be signed with Israel. That marks the beginning of the 7 year Tribulation. The purpose of the Tribulation period is to turn as many of the unbelievers that are left on earth into believers before the end of the world. During the tribulation, there will be 21 judgments sent from God, each worse than the one before. The 7 seal judgments, the 7 Trumpet judgments, and the 7 bowl judgments. During this time, 144,000 Jews and more other people than can be counted will turn to Christ. It's a second chance for those left behind after the rapture. During those 7 years, 3/4 of the earth's population will die... some will die in Christ, and some without. At the end of the 7 years, 1/4 of the population will remain. Those are the people being judged in Rev. 20.

There are some variations of course to what people believe regarding the Rapture and Tribulation (and I think that would be a great thread in and of itself) and I'm no Bible scholar, but I think this is a general idea for you of what happens. I would suggest reading ALL of Revelation, as it's all laid out there plain as day.

There are two thoughts on the Rapture and tribulation. Some scholars believe the Rapture will be prior to the tribulation. Others believe the opposite, there will be the tribulation, then the Rapture. I happen to believe in the first interpretation which makes more sense. The tribulation is like a second chance for those left behind.


The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never let the dumbest ones lead the pack.
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: PAskinner] #7356350
09/15/21 01:57 PM
09/15/21 01:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,718
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,718
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by PAskinner
The majority of believers in Christian history didn't believe in a rapture. ( I'm ducking because I assume somebody's going to throw something at me)
I know it's a very common belief now, but it actually has very little biblical support.

Catholics don't officially believe in the rapture, neither do lutherans and Angelicans, and some Calvinists.
I'm not saying either way, just clarifying that one doesn't have to accept rapture theology to be a Christian.

And yet in the Catholic mass, they say: "Christ has died, Christ has risen, Christ will come again".


The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never let the dumbest ones lead the pack.
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7356370
09/15/21 02:52 PM
09/15/21 02:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
J
James Offline OP
"Minka"
James  Offline OP
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
In the Catholic Church I was raised in, we were taught that Christ shall return for a Judgment Day. I never knew the details, and found it impossible to suspend disbelief in Revelations.

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7356371
09/15/21 02:54 PM
09/15/21 02:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 180
Utah
J
Jasper69 Offline
trapper
Jasper69  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 180
Utah
The second coming of Christ will usher in the millennium.

Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7356405
09/15/21 03:47 PM
09/15/21 03:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,497
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 4,497
PA
Originally Posted by James
In the Catholic Church I was raised in, we were taught that Christ shall return for a Judgment Day. I never knew the details, and found it impossible to suspend disbelief in Revelations.

Jim

It is obviously symbolism.
I read a book that explained that a lot of it happened in the immediate history after John wrote it. The symbols made sense to me when used that way. Often when we use them apply to future events we are just guessing. Which is why you have people thinking that Kissinger or Gorbachev was going to be the Antichrist.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7357500
09/17/21 02:17 AM
09/17/21 02:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
J
James Offline OP
"Minka"
James  Offline OP
"Minka"
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
Interesting explanation, PA, and the most plausible I've heard, maybe even more plausible than my drug/fever delirium theory.

Jim


Forum Infidel since 2001

"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: James] #7357534
09/17/21 06:26 AM
09/17/21 06:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,882
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,882
williamsburg ks
Jehovah witnesses had a date when they first started out, the date came and nothing happened though. A good prophecy is never a simple direct statement. It sounds like hallucination so the believers can just keep waiting. Except for prophecies that have already occurred. Since they are written after the fact there is always detail and not just a description of what sounds like hallucination. A few years ago some Indians in the Dakotas were pretty excited. A white buffalo was born on a ranch. That buffalo wasn't the harbinger of what they are waiting on though either.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: bowhunter27295] #7357635
09/17/21 08:53 AM
09/17/21 08:53 AM
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,286
Maine, Aroostook
Posco Offline
trapper
Posco  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,286
Maine, Aroostook
Originally Posted by bowhunter27295
When I stand before GOD I will lay flat on my face in remorse and apology for all I have done wrong.


I don't think so. There is that one verse about being saved "yet so as by fire" that has me wondering.

Re: Interpretation of Matthew 19: 28-29 [Re: danny clifton] #7357728
09/17/21 10:35 AM
09/17/21 10:35 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,718
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,718
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
[quote=danny clifton] Jehovah witnesses had a date when they first started out, the date came and nothing happened though. A good prophecy is never a simple direct statement. It sounds like hallucination so the believers can just keep waiting. Except for prophecies that have already occurred. Since they are written after the fact there is always detail and not just a description of what sounds like hallucination. A few years ago some Indians in the Dakotas were pretty excited. A white buffalo was born on a ranch. That buffalo wasn't the harbinger of what they are waiting on though either. [/quot
Charles Taze Russell, the founder of the Watchtower Society concluded that the 144,000 referred to them. When that number of members of WS had been reached, the end would come; the world would end. When that never happened, they had to come up with a more believable excuse. They have predicted the end of the world several times. The last one was in the 1970s.

I knew a man who was a lifetime member of the WS. When they predicted the end of the world in the 1970s, he sold his business in anticipation of the end. Of course, when it never happened, he left the society.


The difference between animals and humans is that animals would never let the dumbest ones lead the pack.
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread