No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 45 of 58 1 2 43 44 45 46 47 57 58
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: Average Joe] #7375012
10/09/21 08:24 AM
10/09/21 08:24 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
WIMarshRAT Offline
trapper
WIMarshRAT  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
Originally Posted by Average Joe
I tried to change mine today to preference point but couldn’t find that option, can you no longer change your selection?
.

[Linked Image]


Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: handitrapper] #7375022
10/09/21 08:41 AM
10/09/21 08:41 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,188
Green Bay, Wisconsin
tlguy Offline
trapper
tlguy  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,188
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Average Joe, contact dnr customer service at 888-936-7463 if you want your application changed. It's not something you can do yourself. Normally you can only change your choice up until the application deadline but they're making an exception for the wolf apps because of the circumstances.

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: handitrapper] #7375026
10/09/21 08:45 AM
10/09/21 08:45 AM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
WIMarshRAT Offline
trapper
WIMarshRAT  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
They should be refunding people the fee, but we know that wont happen. I put chances of a season at 20% or less.


Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: Fox Claw] #7375075
10/09/21 09:47 AM
10/09/21 09:47 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Taylor county, Wisconsin
T
Twisted metal Offline
trapper
Twisted metal  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Taylor county, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Fox Claw
Harvest to tag ratio has always been about 10:1. This year the anti- sportsman, animal rights loving DNR has set it at 5:1. Why does our DNR hate us so much?

This is smart when you have a quota system because it gives you a better chance of actually filling your tag because less chance season will close in 2 days like earlier this year.


Life member NRA
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: tlguy] #7375086
10/09/21 10:02 AM
10/09/21 10:02 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Taylor county, Wisconsin
T
Twisted metal Offline
trapper
Twisted metal  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Taylor county, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by tlguy
Let's be honest, how much trust did people really have in the DNR to start with? We have trappers on here from dozens of states, posts complaining about the WI DNR outnumber others 5 to 1. Wisconsinites like to complain. Maybe it's because we're given the idea we have a say with things like CDAC and spring hearings, then when things don't go our way, we stomp our feet and complain about not following the science. Can't have armchair biologists telling actual biologists what to do. That's a recipe for unrest.

But that's here nor there, I feel like we have no voice in this and it'll be what it'll be. I won't have time to trap a wolf this season if we have one, so I'll take my point and try next time if there is a next time.


Most biologists are college educated fools with little to no real world experience. There are a lot of guys like me that have a passion almost obsessed with deer, bear, or any other wildlife that we have devoted a large part of our life to that better understand what is going on than anyone that sits in a office. I spend 1000’s of hours a year outdoors mostly continuing to feed my passion for deer so when someone tells me they know what’s best in my area you can see why I am more than a bit skeptical. There are many folks out there that know what is going on and this is why we don’t like the dnr.


Life member NRA
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: handitrapper] #7375109
10/09/21 10:59 AM
10/09/21 10:59 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,188
Green Bay, Wisconsin
tlguy Offline
trapper
tlguy  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,188
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Must not be any citizen experts like you in Bayfield, Douglas, Iron, Langlade, Oneida and Sawyer counties or the NRB wouldn't have had o cut the CDAC-proposed antlerless quotas by half. See what I'm driving at there?

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: The Beav] #7375111
10/09/21 11:01 AM
10/09/21 11:01 AM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
A
AJE Offline
trapper
AJE  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
Originally Posted by The Beav
When you say the DNR hates Us I think your painting the DNR with to broad of a brush. Those DNR employees are answering to some one way above their pay grade.
I know some of those DNR personnel and they don't hate us.

X2

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: Twisted metal] #7375113
10/09/21 11:02 AM
10/09/21 11:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
A
AJE Offline
trapper
AJE  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Twisted metal
Originally Posted by Fox Claw
Harvest to tag ratio has always been about 10:1. This year the anti- sportsman, animal rights loving DNR has set it at 5:1. Why does our DNR hate us so much?

This is smart when you have a quota system because it gives you a better chance of actually filling your tag because less chance season will close in 2 days like earlier this year.

I agree with Twisted Metal.

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: WIMarshRAT] #7375184
10/09/21 12:55 PM
10/09/21 12:55 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
A
AJE Offline
trapper
AJE  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
Originally Posted by WIMarshRAT
They should be refunding people the fee, but we know that wont happen. I put chances of a season at 20% or less.

Does anyone know if the court case is still going to happen on 10/29? That will effect whether my prediction is higher than 20%.

It would sure be a bummer to draw a tag on the 25th & then the season is halted by a judge on 10/29.

If I draw a tag, I am waiting 'til the day before season to buy it.

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: AJE] #7375186
10/09/21 01:01 PM
10/09/21 01:01 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,355
East-Central Wisconsin
B
bblwi Offline
trapper
bblwi  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 11,355
East-Central Wisconsin
Well I am sure glad all the college educated fool biologist did not get into agriculture so we could make the progress we have. Our dairy cows now milk almost 6 times as much as they did when WW11 started and they can now provide food for 7.5 billion instead of just under 3 billion, ditto pork, poultry and our crops. Today our corn crop averages over 100 bushels per acre more than in the 1940s. Sure there are costs to this but science along with management, has made great strides. I got my degree in wildlife ecology and really wanted to be a game biologist to study game populations and do the research and investigation, but based on the continuous extremely negative discussion regarding our stupidity and eternally grateful those doors were never opened for me.

Bryce

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: Twisted metal] #7375199
10/09/21 01:17 PM
10/09/21 01:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
A
AJE Offline
trapper
AJE  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 10,094
WI - Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Twisted metal
Originally Posted by tlguy
Let's be honest, how much trust did people really have in the DNR to start with? We have trappers on here from dozens of states, posts complaining about the WI DNR outnumber others 5 to 1. Wisconsinites like to complain. Maybe it's because we're given the idea we have a say with things like CDAC and spring hearings, then when things don't go our way, we stomp our feet and complain about not following the science. Can't have armchair biologists telling actual biologists what to do. That's a recipe for unrest.

But that's here nor there, I feel like we have no voice in this and it'll be what it'll be. I won't have time to trap a wolf this season if we have one, so I'll take my point and try next time if there is a next time.


Most biologists are college educated fools with little to no real world experience.
That is a far fetched statement Twisted metal. You won't win brownie points for trappers by making generalized comments like that. No wonder we lose great biologists like Nathan R & Curtis T to other states.

Last edited by AJE; 10/09/21 01:24 PM.
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: AJE] #7375265
10/09/21 03:54 PM
10/09/21 03:54 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,060
East Central Wi.
coyote addict Offline
trapper
coyote addict  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,060
East Central Wi.
Originally Posted by AJE
Originally Posted by tlguy
I switched my application from harvest tag to preference point.

I hope more people do this, as it increases my chances of drawing a tag this year. I'm ready, well I will be if I draw.


A J E. If you switch to a point then my chance for a tag would increase . Just a happy thought !

Last edited by coyote addict; 10/09/21 03:56 PM.

Member -W.T.A. N.T.A. - N.R. A.
A Shotgun. A Rifle and a 4 Wheel Drive.. A Country Boy. Will Survive
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: AJE] #7375304
10/09/21 05:33 PM
10/09/21 05:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
WIMarshRAT Offline
trapper
WIMarshRAT  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
Originally Posted by AJE
Originally Posted by WIMarshRAT
They should be refunding people the fee, but we know that wont happen. I put chances of a season at 20% or less.

Does anyone know if the court case is still going to happen on 10/29? That will effect whether my prediction is higher than 20%.


Someone is paying attention. Just remember in that court case, we have the same attn general representing the board and DNR that is also trying to remove the Chair of the board. 20% might be too optimistic.

I heard there was an NRB special meeting yesterday about the very issue. Anything come out if it?

Last edited by WIMarshRAT; 10/09/21 05:33 PM.

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: AJE] #7375309
10/09/21 05:46 PM
10/09/21 05:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
WIMarshRAT Offline
trapper
WIMarshRAT  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,804
WI
I think most biologists spend a great amount of time outdoors. At least the ones I have come across. Folks that tend to get frustrated tend to be those that struggle to communicate effectively. The biggest challenge for the average sportsman is separating it out of the communication and laying blame where it belongs.

We didn't lose our large carnivore specialist because people questioned him. I think he rather enjoyed questioning things. We lost him because politics tied his hands while he was on the States payroll IMO.


Last edited by WIMarshRAT; 10/09/21 05:47 PM.

Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to dance in the rain!
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: Fox Claw] #7375315
10/09/21 06:02 PM
10/09/21 06:02 PM
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 315
Wisconsin
A
Average Joe Offline
trapper
Average Joe  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 315
Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Fox Claw
Harvest to tag ratio has always been about 10:1. This year the anti- sportsman, animal rights loving DNR has set it at 5:1. Why does our DNR hate us so much?


Yeah the 5:1 ratio is better theoretically for a longer season and better odds for a trapper, but I doubt it will play out that way. With such a low quota the season will be very short. More wolves out there with the young of the year. Hound hunting ends up being a group hunt and people will seek out houndsmen to get their tag punched quickly. Snow (or lack of) could be the great equalizer though. And some of that group effect goes on with trappers too. Plus WDNR will be super sensitive to going over quota again and will close season early. Not to mention the new, quicker registration requirements.
I’m thankful there’s a season to at least get rid of some of them, but I’d rather collect points for a better quality hunt later. Hopefully.

Last edited by Average Joe; 10/09/21 06:11 PM.

I’ve been sayin yes sir all day at work, I’ve been sayin yes ma’am at home…
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: WIMarshRAT] #7375316
10/09/21 06:03 PM
10/09/21 06:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 315
Wisconsin
A
Average Joe Offline
trapper
Average Joe  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 315
Wisconsin
Originally Posted by WIMarshRAT
Originally Posted by Average Joe
I tried to change mine today to preference point but couldn’t find that option, can you no longer change your selection?
.

[Linked Image]


Thanks!


I’ve been sayin yes sir all day at work, I’ve been sayin yes ma’am at home…
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: handitrapper] #7375349
10/09/21 06:50 PM
10/09/21 06:50 PM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,188
Green Bay, Wisconsin
tlguy Offline
trapper
tlguy  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,188
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Hunting with hounds doesn't open until after the gun deer season I believe. I don't have the exact dates in front of me. So there are at least a few weeks of hunting/trapping before hunting with hounds is allowed.

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: Average Joe] #7375374
10/09/21 07:34 PM
10/09/21 07:34 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
MN
Originally Posted by Average Joe

I’m thankful there’s a season to at least get rid of some of them, .....................


Having some sort of a harvest season is considerably better than our situation in Minnesota, with much higher wolf density and no season at all. But, you are fooling yourself if you think that removing 130 wolves from a healthy reproducing population is really "getting rid of some of them". A "quota" of 130 wolves will make no significant difference in lowering the Wisconsin wolf population.

Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: AJE] #7375439
10/09/21 09:13 PM
10/09/21 09:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Taylor county, Wisconsin
T
Twisted metal Offline
trapper
Twisted metal  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 133
Taylor county, Wisconsin

Most biologists are college educated fools with little to no real world experience. [/quote] That is a far fetched statement Twisted metal. You won't win brownie points for trappers by making generalized comments like that. No wonder we lose great biologists like Nathan R & Curtis T to other states.[/quote]
Highly unlikely that is why these guys left Wisconsin. The fact of all of this is the dnr is just driven by politics if anyone wants to believe it or not. I have been involved with this stuff first hand so I do speak with some experience. When we made our recommendations and they 100% ignored them. I have been told by a couple of dnr insiders that decisions are made internally regardless of what recommendations are made in public hearings or outside input. I have stepped away from this crap because of this. The majority doesn’t matter anymore. Don’t throw personal attacks at me to make yourself feel better but I am willing to listen to other opinions.


Life member NRA
Re: Wisconsin Wolves [Re: walleye101] #7375496
10/09/21 10:23 PM
10/09/21 10:23 PM
Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 315
Wisconsin
A
Average Joe Offline
trapper
Average Joe  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Aug 2021
Posts: 315
Wisconsin
Originally Posted by walleye101
Originally Posted by Average Joe

I’m thankful there’s a season to at least get rid of some of them, .....................


Having some sort of a harvest season is considerably better than our situation in Minnesota, with much higher wolf density and no season at all. But, you are fooling yourself if you think that removing 130 wolves from a healthy reproducing population is really "getting rid of some of them". A "quota" of 130 wolves will make no significant difference in lowering the Wisconsin wolf population.


Agreed, it’s not good but it is better than nothing considering exponential population growth. Probably saves several hundred deer, including some good bucks. Bucks exhausted after the rut are stinky and easy to track and kill by wolves.


I’ve been sayin yes sir all day at work, I’ve been sayin yes ma’am at home…
Page 45 of 58 1 2 43 44 45 46 47 57 58
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread