I bet they all wear leather shoes/gloves!

It would be interesting to know if they still accept advertising for leather products - shoes, handbags, gloves, etc.

Most likely they see no connection between fur and leather, even though both require dead animals.

Plus, they talk about sustainability. What is more sustainable than fur! New batch happens every year!

Clueless liberals.

I guess I'll have to cancel my subscription now......

I was thinking the same thing, Seth! I am so dissapointed

I fixed it for you.



Keith

Keith - I think you misinterpreted my post and Leftlanes response.

When I said a new batch happens every year - I meant fur is a renewable resource. Fur animals are breeding and producing new animals year after year after year. Fake fur, for the most part, is a petroleum product. Limited supply.

Left lane’s post means we need to remind the antis that fur is renewable.

Its not just liberals how many times you seen fur on Fox news advertised, Trumps wife and daughters went furless years ago, Kristi Nome is not sporting fur, you don't see it on any of the parkas or trench coats going into the house of congress or wall street. Last I saw a good promotion for fur was Joe Namath wearing a full length coyote coyote coat at the super bowl. Most of the EU is banning fur on at least not wearing it even in the Scandinavian countries. Our last big use of fur is with Russia, China, Korea some of Canada and God bless Italy were it is still in fashion. Its all about consumers perception and money in in overall sales.

I fixed Leftlane's response so that it referred to the antis.

Keith

Just another part of the “woke” movement that the media like to portray as the common way of thinking.