No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: danvee] #7578656
05/06/22 09:44 PM
05/06/22 09:44 PM
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 207
West coast Wisconsin
50fps Offline
trapper
50fps  Offline
trapper

Joined: May 2018
Posts: 207
West coast Wisconsin
Originally Posted by danvee
1st amendment as long as its on public property.


Are you sure about that?

18 usc 1507

Last edited by 50fps; 05/06/22 09:47 PM.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7578667
05/06/22 09:51 PM
05/06/22 09:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
^ nice...


E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Scuba1] #7578786
05/06/22 11:21 PM
05/06/22 11:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,404
Northeast Oklahoma
M
Mike in A-town Offline
trapper
Mike in A-town  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 10,404
Northeast Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Scuba1
They should pull down the fence around sniffles place in Delaware and dismiss the security detail. Let him find out just how popular he is.


They'll imply that the fence is to keep you out... But it's really to keep the senile imbecile from wandering off the grounds and out into traffic when he goes looking to settle the score with CornPop.

Mike


One man with a gun may control 100 others who have none.

Vladimir Lenin
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: lee steinmeyer] #7578996
05/07/22 08:49 AM
05/07/22 08:49 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by HobbieTrapper
Originally Posted by yotetrapper30
We really dropped the ball, imo, with January 6th. After the cops start beating, arresting and shooting! people, the general consensus among conservatives seemed to be "they should have stayed home, not got involved" when instead we should have been out in droves protesting (just as peacefully as BLM did). They treated the Jan 6th protest the way they did because we allowed it.


Exactly. Not a very good plan to win.

Originally Posted by lee steinmeyer
I agree with both of you, but.....cant just be two or three, or two or three hundred, needs to be all conservatives, or at least every one that could possibly get there. Other wise, the gustapo would just cuff and stuff. And the few would still be in the lockup, just like the ones they hunted down for Jan 6th. I've said all along, we need a leader!


Biggest challenge is communication. It is needed for recruitment and organization. The government monitoring all forms of it, the aforementioned will be slow, requiring a lot of travel.


-Goofy-
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580553
05/09/22 01:14 PM
05/09/22 01:14 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
(fox)

Douglas Blair, a news editor for The Daily Signal, said the pro-choice protests outside Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's home were "one of the scariest things" he's ever witnessed. On "Fox & Friends" Monday, he called the protests an "attempt at intimidation" and pointed out the Biden administration's failure to condemn the demonstrations.

DOUGLAS BLAIR: This is an attempt at intimidation. And I think it really says a lot, too, that the Biden administration is willing to absolutely let these justices out to dry. They're not going to say, 'It's not acceptable for you to go to somebody's house and yell and scream.' That's not how we do it in this country. …

I did not see Justice Kavanaugh. My hope is that he wasn't home. My hope is that he was safe with his family somewhere else because it was genuinely one of the scariest things I've ever witnessed. Watching these people yell and scream and try and change the vote of what is most possibly the most important vote in the history of this country: the right to live your life and to have a human being survive in the womb.


E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580558
05/09/22 01:18 PM
05/09/22 01:18 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,688
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,688
pa
Originally Posted by Marty
(fox)

Douglas Blair, a news editor for The Daily Signal, said the pro-choice protests outside Supreme Court Justice Kavanaugh's home were "one of the scariest things" he's ever witnessed. On "Fox & Friends" Monday, he called the protests an "attempt at intimidation" and pointed out the Biden administration's failure to condemn the demonstrations.

DOUGLAS BLAIR: This is an attempt at intimidation. And I think it really says a lot, too, that the Biden administration is willing to absolutely let these justices out to dry. They're not going to say, 'It's not acceptable for you to go to somebody's house and yell and scream.' That's not how we do it in this country. …

I did not see Justice Kavanaugh. My hope is that he wasn't home. My hope is that he was safe with his family somewhere else because it was genuinely one of the scariest things I've ever witnessed. Watching these people yell and scream and try and change the vote of what is most possibly the most important vote in the history of this country: the right to live your life and to have a human being survive in the womb.



And yet people defend democrats.

They are the enemy to our country and our system..period.

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580561
05/09/22 01:22 PM
05/09/22 01:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
(fox)

Reporter calls for violence against pro-lifers, says they shouldn't have 'peace or safety' until they're dead.

Pro-abortion group targeting churches has links to Revolutionary Communist Party.

Fox web site has more info on these headlines...


E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580564
05/09/22 01:25 PM
05/09/22 01:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 345
ontario
G
grampy Offline
trapper
grampy  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 345
ontario
Someone during the weekend read a law that stated it was illegal to gather,protest or try to influence the Court's decision anywhere in your Country. Can't remember but a good chance I heard it on Fox. Showed the wording, not that it matters much as nothing will be done.

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580566
05/09/22 01:29 PM
05/09/22 01:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
§1507. Picketing or parading
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

The doj will not enforce this law for abortion protests, they probably would if you were protesting for 2nd amendment.

The enemy controls almost everything and now they are targeting the scotus with the end goal = to control it.



E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580567
05/09/22 01:33 PM
05/09/22 01:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,124
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Offline

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,124
McGrath, AK
18 U.S. Code § 1507, which states:

"Picketing or parading
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt."


As it happens this portion of the law was amended by the 1994 crime bill, when federal lawmakers removed from this provision language imposing a $5,000 limit on the fines to be assessed.
The 1994 law was passed with the support of Sen. Joe Biden (D., Del.) and was co-sponsored by Rep. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.).


Mean As Nails
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: grampy] #7580569
05/09/22 01:33 PM
05/09/22 01:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,688
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,688
pa
Originally Posted by grampy
Someone during the weekend read a law that stated it was illegal to gather,protest or try to influence the Court's decision anywhere in your Country. Can't remember but a good chance I heard it on Fox. Showed the wording, not that it matters much as nothing will be done.


I heard that too, but here's the problem......

Our agencies in D.C. that would be the ones to enforce it are infested with liberals that support them.

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580576
05/09/22 01:42 PM
05/09/22 01:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
(fox)
Headline:
Pelosi lauds protesters using 'righteous anger' to 'march and mobilize,' as Supreme Court set to overturn Roe.

If you think these people will hesitate to use violence when the moment comes for that your not thinking clearly. Guarantee pelosi knows full well she is encouraging illegal behavior.


E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580603
05/09/22 02:19 PM
05/09/22 02:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
(fox)

Two Republican lawmakers are pressing the Justice Department to take more seriously threats made against churches after a draft opinion from the Supreme Court threatened to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Texas Rep. Chip Roy and Utah Sen. Mike Lee sent a letter Saturday to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking him to marshal resources necessary to protect churches under threat of vandalism and disruptive protest.

"We write to you today extremely concerned by multiple reports surfacing that left-wing activists intend to protest, and possibly disrupt, church services this weekend in direct response to the leaked opinion authored by Justice Alito that would overturn Roe v. Wade," Lee and Roy wrote.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Liberal social media commentators are rallying support for abortion activists to protest outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes and at churches.

"Go to people's homes. Go to their places of worship. Make them as uncomfortable as they are trying to make you. This is not the time for civility, this is the time for mass resistance and demonstration," cartoonist Jon Rosenberg tweeted in response to political commentator Bill Kristol urging people to not protest at the justices’ homes and at churches.


E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580605
05/09/22 02:23 PM
05/09/22 02:23 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,688
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 19,688
pa
Originally Posted by Marty
(fox)

Two Republican lawmakers are pressing the Justice Department to take more seriously threats made against churches after a draft opinion from the Supreme Court threatened to overturn Roe v. Wade.

Texas Rep. Chip Roy and Utah Sen. Mike Lee sent a letter Saturday to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking him to marshal resources necessary to protect churches under threat of vandalism and disruptive protest.

"We write to you today extremely concerned by multiple reports surfacing that left-wing activists intend to protest, and possibly disrupt, church services this weekend in direct response to the leaked opinion authored by Justice Alito that would overturn Roe v. Wade," Lee and Roy wrote.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Liberal social media commentators are rallying support for abortion activists to protest outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes and at churches.

"Go to people's homes. Go to their places of worship. Make them as uncomfortable as they are trying to make you. This is not the time for civility, this is the time for mass resistance and demonstration," cartoonist Jon Rosenberg tweeted in response to political commentator Bill Kristol urging people to not protest at the justices’ homes and at churches.



I'm sure he'll get right on it after he finishes investigating the Biden's for Hunters laptop.

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580659
05/09/22 03:44 PM
05/09/22 03:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 28,715
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Where are all these agitators?


-Goofy-
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580666
05/09/22 03:56 PM
05/09/22 03:56 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,520
Champaign County, Ohio.
K
KeithC Offline
trapper
KeithC  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: May 2009
Posts: 15,520
Champaign County, Ohio.
Originally Posted by Feedinggrounds
Originally Posted by VaBeagler
Give all of them a black mouth cur,. Protesters won't be there long.

Catahula will get them stepping too!


A catahoula will get them stepping.

[Linked Image]

A kangal will digest them bones and all.

[Linked Image]

Keith

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580776
05/09/22 07:15 PM
05/09/22 07:15 PM
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,204
Missouri
H
HayDay Offline
trapper
HayDay  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,204
Missouri
Didn't wade through the entire thread.......but as I understand it, protesting outside the home of a SCOTUS justice is a federal crime. If so, rule of law either matters or it doesn't. Can't have it both ways. This matters just as much as Jan 6th. Shoe is now on the other foot.

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: Marty] #7580781
05/09/22 07:21 PM
05/09/22 07:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,872
Adirondacks, NY
Fisher Man Offline
trapper
Fisher Man  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,872
Adirondacks, NY
Pelosi's and Schumer's home should be picketed for their shameful behavior. Where are the riughts of the unborn????

Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: danny clifton] #7580788
05/09/22 07:34 PM
05/09/22 07:34 PM
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,925
Aliceville, Kansas 43
Yukon John Offline
trapper
Yukon John  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 4,925
Aliceville, Kansas 43
Originally Posted by danny clifton
I can see just fine. If your going to say the people who entered the capital were exorcising their right to assemble peacefully, you have to extend that right to people protesting judges. I am aware that conservative points of view are under attack. That doesn't make shutting down the speech of communists a good idea.

I'm pretty sure there are people still in prison from that day...I could be wrong though.


Act like a blank, get treated like a blank. Insert your own blank!
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes.... [Re: HayDay] #7580812
05/09/22 08:11 PM
05/09/22 08:11 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Marty Offline OP
trapper
Marty  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 20,914
North East Kansas
Originally Posted by HayDay
Didn't wade through the entire thread.......but as I understand it, protesting outside the home of a SCOTUS justice is a federal crime. If so, rule of law either matters or it doesn't. Can't have it both ways. This matters just as much as Jan 6th. Shoe is now on the other foot.


The liberals choose when and where rule of law is applied...if at all. We have an illegitimate federal government doing as it pleases.....time to do something about it.


E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread