|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Marty]
#7581710
05/10/22 11:11 PM
05/10/22 11:11 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,053
North East Kansas
Marty
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,053
North East Kansas
|
(fox)
The left-wing group Ruth Sent Us announced Tuesday that protesters from multiple pro-abortion groups are descending on Pelosi’s San Francisco home Tuesday evening to demand that she "investigate the corrupt justices" and "save abortion."
"We will be marching to the front door of [Pelosi’s] Pac Heights mansion to demand: #SaveAbortionNancy #DefendRoe!," Ruth Sent Us tweeted.
E
'Honey Badger Militia'
Sleep, the anti woke adote.
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Marty]
#7581728
05/10/22 11:42 PM
05/10/22 11:42 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,253
Maine, Aroostook
Posco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 11,253
Maine, Aroostook
|
(fox)
The left-wing group Ruth Sent Us announced Tuesday that protesters from multiple pro-abortion groups are descending on Pelosi’s San Francisco home Tuesday evening to demand that she "investigate the corrupt justices" and "save abortion."
"We will be marching to the front door of [Pelosi’s] Pac Heights mansion to demand: #SaveAbortionNancy #DefendRoe!," Ruth Sent Us tweeted.
Those aren't protests, Marty, those are rallies. They become protests when we show up. I hope it happens soon to highlight her hypocrisy.
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Marty]
#7582738
05/12/22 03:32 PM
05/12/22 03:32 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,913
ohio
Ohio Wolverine
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,913
ohio
|
Submit
Current
Submit
<< Previous TITLE 18 / PART I / CHAPTER 73 / § 1507 Next >>
[Print] [Print selection][OLRC Home]Help
18 USC 1507: Picketing or parading
Text contains those laws in effect on May 11, 2022
From Title 18-CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I-CRIMES
CHAPTER 73-OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
Jump To:
Source Credit
Miscellaneous
Amendments
§1507. Picketing or parading
Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
(Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, §31(a), 64 Stat. 1018 ; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147 .)
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994-Pub. L. 103–322 substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not more than $5,000" in first par.
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us!
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Marty]
#7582754
05/12/22 04:01 PM
05/12/22 04:01 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,913
ohio
Ohio Wolverine
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,913
ohio
|
Watch they won't enforce it, because the democrats didn't know it was against the law, and they didn't mean it!
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us!
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Marty]
#7582757
05/12/22 04:10 PM
05/12/22 04:10 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,492
james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 45,492
james bay frontierOnt.
|
(fox)
The left-wing group Ruth Sent Us announced Tuesday that protesters from multiple pro-abortion groups are descending on Pelosi’s San Francisco home Tuesday evening to demand that she "investigate the corrupt justices" and "save abortion."
"We will be marching to the front door of [Pelosi’s] Pac Heights mansion to demand: #SaveAbortionNancy #DefendRoe!," Ruth Sent Us tweeted.
Wont be long all these rich entitled bigwigs of all stripes will be dragged out into the streets and beat to death by the people. Shortly before that happens you will see them try to sheild themselves by moving into gated guarded communities.That will only postpone the inevitable for a short time.
Last edited by Boco; 05/12/22 04:12 PM.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Marty]
#7582764
05/12/22 04:28 PM
05/12/22 04:28 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,697
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Trapper7
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 15,697
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
|
What I understood about the abortion issue is that it doesn't end a woman's right to abortion, but sends it back to the states. Our MN crackpot liberal governor explained it that way. He went on to say that women in MN had nothing to worry about.
We are told not to judge all Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but are told to judge all gunowners by the actions of a few.
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: danny clifton]
#7582789
05/12/22 05:39 PM
05/12/22 05:39 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,028
Fredonia, PA.
Finster
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 17,028
Fredonia, PA.
|
They are guarded by U.S. Marshals . I doubt they get on private property or block vehicles without a fed going upside their head. Peaceful protest on public property or right of ways is one of the things justices are supposed to protect. Biden doesn't have the constitutional authority to stop it. WRONG! It is a felony to protest a SCOTUS Judge in a private setting, ie: their home, in order to intimidate their decision. That is EXACTLY what they are doing.
Last edited by Finster; 05/12/22 05:39 PM.
I BELIEVE IN MY GOD, MY COUNTRY AND IN MYSELF.
|
|
|
Re: protests allowed at scotus justices homes....
[Re: Finster]
#7582809
05/12/22 06:25 PM
05/12/22 06:25 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,913
ohio
Ohio Wolverine
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,913
ohio
|
They are guarded by U.S. Marshals . I doubt they get on private property or block vehicles without a fed going upside their head. Peaceful protest on public property or right of ways is one of the things justices are supposed to protect. Biden doesn't have the constitutional authority to stop it. WRONG! It is a felony to protest a SCOTUS Judge in a private setting, ie: their home, in order to intimidate their decision. That is EXACTLY what they are doing. Right and watch because they're the left , nothing will happen to them .
We have met the enemy and the enemy is us!
|
|
|
|
|
