No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: 1936 temp [Re: Foxpaw] #8157992
06/20/24 12:31 PM
06/20/24 12:31 PM
Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
F
Foxpaw Offline OP
trapper
Foxpaw  Offline OP
trapper
F

Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
I remember the Woolly Mammoths on "Quest for Fire" were quite woolly and before they got done shooting the scene the mammoths were getting quite cold so much there was concern for their well being. Proof right there the cold came on suddenly !

Re: 1936 temp [Re: Foxpaw] #8158019
06/20/24 01:22 PM
06/20/24 01:22 PM
Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois
F
Foxpaw Offline OP
trapper
Foxpaw  Offline OP
trapper
F

Joined: May 2016
Southern Illinois

Re: 1936 temp [Re: Boco] #8158048
06/20/24 02:27 PM
06/20/24 02:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Henderson, N.Y. Jefferson Co.
W
walleyed Offline
trapper
walleyed  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Feb 2010
Henderson, N.Y. Jefferson Co.
Originally Posted by Boco
Why were the mammoths wooly
if they lived in a tropical climate,-LOL.I say BS.


OCOB is the antichrist !!! laugh


"Provisional/Interim" member of NYSTA

"I Support Non-Resident Trapping"



Re: 1936 temp [Re: BernieB.] #8158158
06/20/24 05:57 PM
06/20/24 05:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
B
Boco Offline
trapper
Boco  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
Originally Posted by BernieB.
Originally Posted by Boco
Why were the mammoths wooly if they lived in a tropical climate,and if they died in a tropical climate how sis their corpses freeze before decomposition?-LOL.I say BS.
The pleistocene was frigid.


LOL you call BS on a scientifically proven fact? Things that have been seen with our own eyes in our own lifetime? Come on, that's a bit crazy even for you.

Why are sloths wooly when they live in the Amazon jungle? Why are so many other mammals covered with fur when they don't live in temperate climates?

You can't just believe what you want to be true and have credibility anywhere. Come on man. Think outside the box, the mammoths lived in a world that was tropical, the entire earth was tropical, encased by a thick ozone layer. The mammoths died in a cataclysmic event which lead to them floating into areas of the earth that suddenly became cold with the change in the atmosphere.

The changes in the earth are not long, gradual changes. They are the result of a series of radical cataclysmic changes. Once you start to realize that, the whole narrative that is followed by today's "Science" with regard to the history of our planet falls apart. If you have an open mind about it, your whole perspective will change.


Wolly mammoths were adapted to a niche climate that being COLD Steppe Tundra,not the jungle you ejit,lol.


Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
Re: 1936 temp [Re: OhioBoy] #8158316
06/20/24 10:56 PM
06/20/24 10:56 PM
Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
5
52Carl Offline
trapper
52Carl  Offline
trapper
5

Joined: Jan 2014
Virginia
Originally Posted by OhioBoy
NASA has a pretty cool climate change website where it shows you vital signs and you can look at the data FYI. Its pretty interesting if you check it out.

https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/carbon-dioxide/?intent=111

https://science.nasa.gov/climate-change/evidence/

[Linked Image]

My question is this. Whenever a scientific study is conducted, there is a calculation of Margin Of Error published. Until I see what that is for deciphering Co2 found in ancient ice core samples, I am compelled to question their results.
Furthermore, I suspect that they are comparing ice core data with data collected using currently available technology to measure Co2. That, in and of itself, lends their conclusions invalid, scientifically speaking.

Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread