POTUS Taking Hydroxychloroquine

Trump Claims He’s Experimenting With Hydroxychloroquine On Himself

President Donald Trump says he’s been taking hydroxychloroquine, the anti-malarial drug his administration has touted as a potential treatment for the coronavirus pandemic. The Food and Drug Administration has warned against its use in COVID-19 cases except in formal studies, citing serious heart risk.

His body, his Choice.

hmmmm...

Who really cares? He says and does pretty much what ever he wants. Might be true might not.

Mac

He had his Dr. prescribe it to him as a preventative because there is a study ongoing
that is showing promise for that , there are other countries doing the same .
.GOV

He's just trying to help his fellow man, leading the way.

I'm taking Miller high Life, Jameson and hand rolled cigarettes. Haven't caught covid yet.

My friend, a nurse, has been taking it for 8 years. Pretty sure the side-effects are already documented.

They talked about this today on talk radio. Seems some highly trusted doctors have found the hydroxychloroquine should be taken during the first stage of covid. It stops the replication of the virus. If the virus gets to the 2nd stage of covid, it's to late, you need some steroid. It seems to show promise, but the beurocrats are dragging their feet either beacaue they can get more money if they let it go to a more dangerous stage. The drugs are cheap and hospitals are not. It's either money or politics that is preventing doctors from administering the hydrox.

This drug is already out there, no money in that.

There is thousands taking it for arthritis and I have never saw in the papers it was killing people in vast amounts unlike some of their other arthritis medicine (vioxx). Also they said for all those taking it for lupus or arthritis to continue taking it. Seems if it was all that bad why let them continue taking it. I heard somewhere that maybe it was harder on people to take it after they had the virus. Thus the President is taking it before he gets it.

Back earlier a arthritis Dr on tv on news said none of his patients at that time that was on it had gotten the virus, wish there was some studies on that. About all I see is how many test they are taking and how many positives there is. Which mean nothing to me because the more they test the more there is, test less and there would be less. News said this morning that some test may be wrong esp. false negatives. I guess the truth is the daughter of time!

I've been testing myself for Covid every day. They say one of the symptoms is loss of taste and smell, so I pop open a Grain Belt Premium every so often throughout the day to make sure I'm still ok.

Been trying to self-test sense of taste and smell on a daily basis for some time now by utilizing flatus events. I have determined that I either have the virus, or mine, indeed, do not stink, as I have always asserted...

I don't want to know how you test taste with this method.

I just let one fly....and everyone in the house is complaining and that I should live outside....guess they are Covid free...

My co-worker at the tech college we taught at has been taking this drug for 30 plus years ever since her lupus diagnosis. She has always had a ton of side effects but she is on a huge battery of medications so it is difficult to state which ones are specifically caused by a single drug. Right after the first mention of this product there was a huge run on this drug and her and others (my sister-in-law) takes this for arthritis as well were concerned about availability and or price rises. That subsided but we will see what happens now that this has become an issue again.

Bryce

Hurrah! At least one TM member relies on science to make his decisions!

Ole Trumpy survived Stormy Daniels(cant imagine what she was carrying),a little covid or chloroquinine wont hurt him.

I bet the MSM is having a coronary over this.

and Trudeau's face eventually faded to white...

A lady I work with has been taking it for a decade or so for her lupus. She ain't died yet from it or had any side effects from it.

my brother in law takes it daily for arthritis in his hands. his wife was the first covid positive in their county, and she spent 12 nights in the hospital in Rochester, and was one day out from being put on a ventilator, so she was seriously ill. 10 doses of remdesivir fixed her up, but no way her husband wasn't in contact with covid for at least 2 weeks. he never caught it, and never tested positive. no reason other than the chloroquine that he wasn't infected.

Id take it if I thought I came in contact with the virus.

no different than me taking viagra to keep from rollin outta bed.

So some of the side effects are positive.

I figured he had been taking it for a couple months. Proven and safe drug.

Hydroxy.. Was one of the drugs the UofM tried with me on a disease that struck me 15 years ago. The drug was treated very matter of factly and considered no big deal, a very safe drug.
The way this drug was instantly downplayed and belittled by so many politicians, media, and others has me convinced this "crisis" is not about the health and welfare of Americans.

Osky

The effectiveness of it to prevent covid was stumbled on in China. ZERO people that had been taking it for other ailments got sick from covid. Some Dr tried it in a study on people already effected and due to weakened heart function because of fluid some died. THUS the talk it kills people.

The big reason this drug was vilified in the press and by politicians with a D after name is because Trump suggested it.

it's been around a long time and proven effective with few side effects.

Saw Nancy P. in an interview with Pierce Morgan. She stated that Trump taking this drug was too dangerous for a sitting president, especially Trump since he was so "morbidly obese". I wondered if it would be dangerous for her to take it since she's so "morbidly ugly"?

Lol, another reason I like the mask thing.

Good point!

I don't think this thread went the direction the OP was hoping ,
here's an article that points out that during the first SARS outbreak in 2013 ( covid -19 is the 2nd )
someone had a different opinion on Hydroxychloroquine , Fauci

Chlooroqine has alot more side effects and problems than does hydroxychoroquine.

Fauci originally predicted 40M Americans would die as a result of Covid19. He keeps changing the number. Sometimes his reliability is questionable.

Sometimes? Fauci's credibility is shot as far as I'm concerned.

But that's only applicable logic when you want it to be.

It is only in the news because Trump is taking it.

Fauci sits on the leadership council of the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation .conflict of interest ?

He's made it clear he has high praise for Hillary.

He certainly is a Hillary fan but I don't see how he has a conflict of interest because he is on a committee at the Gates Foundation. What am I missing ?

She has room to talk with all her plastic surgeries.

Gates wants to vaccinate everyone, so the worse this pandemic the better for him?

Why would you conclude that ? He isn't making anything from this. He is, in fact, spending hundreds of millions of his own money to support research into at least 7...if I remember correctly...different possible vaccines....all from different publicly owned companies.

In addition, he has put up another 250 million to help build a production facility to produce whatever drug is shown to be successful..........if any.

Sounds like a huge risk to me.

I agree with you there.

Just guessing, can't think of a better reason.

There could be lots of money in it if he would somehow control the vaccines for the world.

I'm also guessing that's all a write-off for him.

I don't see what the Fake News Media is crying about. Seems like as much as they hate Trump they would be glad he's taking it in the hopes it would kill him. Cant make those libtards happy for nothing!

OOPS I was off subject!

Since taking Lysol and Clorox, the ring in my toilet bowl has disappeared.

LMAO!

Actually there isn't much money in vaccines at all. That's why pharmaceutical companies spend more time and research dollars on drugs for cancer or other really insidious stuff. Most vaccines sell (wholesale) for between 10-30 bucks a pop.

The ones that are currently in the clinical trial stages for CV19 will be donated by their developers..............EXCEPT for the one being worked on by Moderna. They haven't said what they will charge. But until a drug is successful, no one is going to make any money.

Even if you controlled all the vaccines, where does your revenue come from after everyone has immunity ?

I am sure that his donations through the foundation are a tax write off.But that really doesn't matter when you have already agreed to give away all 106 BILLION of your wealth to charity.

Lady asked at the funeral, How much did he leave? The other lady replied all of it!

Gates is maybe in it for the chip in the forehead plan???..

What worries me is if one is required to get the vaccine before returning to work, school, etc. Then how can they verify that they have had the vaccine, By paper work ? We all know how that gets lost or forged and people in general hate paper work even electronically. So someone will get the idea of a chip under your skin and that will be when people refuse the vaccine. Except those that must have a job or buy and sell at the market.

Same

LOL !! Right !

The drug is so old it is surely a generic now.

10 states are already violating hipaa laws by giving law enforcement the names of people who have the virus. They won't give out any other medical issues like Aids, but there seems to be enough people willing to overlook our freedoms now that laws don't mean squat

Sad deal and you don't have to look far to see the people who are empowering the destruction of our rights.

AND, wouldn't these apps that tell you if you get close to someone infected also be a violation?

maybe this is why Gates is buddying up to the career gov't officials.

Just a little bit about cloroquin...it's basically synthetic quinine. You know, the stuff in tonic water.

I thought gin came in tonic, learn something new everyday.

Sorry I took so long to answer , but here's 100,000,000 reasons .Armstrong Economics

What does a man who has more money than 6-7 generations of his can spend ?
Prestige .
If he " cures " the world with his vaccines , he won't be the only one who thinks he's some kind of God .
It's not always about the money .

Unfortunately Art, the article loses all credibility when it says........" It is Gates who wants to inject us all with microchips.." And.............."these people typically also OWN the SEC"


Armstrong:

"Martin Arthur Armstrong (born November 1, 1949) is an American self-taught[1] economic forecaster and convicted felon who spent 11 years in jail for cheating investors out of $700 million and hiding $15 million in assets from regulators.[1] "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_A._Armstrong

I posted that article to show Gates gave the money to NIH not to promote a chip conspiracy .
How about this one , no mention of chips
You can argue that there is no globalist / nationalist conflict going on , but that would be a different discussion .
Warning , the article is from a right leaning site , doesn't change the fact that Fauci is saying
a vaccine is our only hope .
Has there ever been a flu vaccine that was 100 percent effective ? <--- Real question .

To my knowledge there is no flu vaccine that is 100 % effective....but I don't think that is necessary. A certain percentage of protection would help a great deal. There ARE vaccines that are 100% so it's not out of the realm of possibility. Realistically, I doubt that will happen.

Gates actually gave only 20 million to WHO and 20 million to CDC.The other 60 million went to CEPI.

I'm no fan of Fauci at all. He has clearly said a lot of contradictory things. On the other hand, what we know, or think we know, about the virus is constantly changing. So I would have to cut any medical researcher some slack. They certainly know more than I do.

What I don't understand is the movement to demonize Bill Gates. It seems to me that he is trying to help while in no way trying to benefit personally. He is actually trying to give away his fortune, not make more money.

I don't believe there is any globalist agenda at work here. Some geopolitical actors will certainly take advantage of any perceived weaknesses.

I do believe that Fauci has a political view of this and it's pretty obvious that blue state governors are only trying to make things worse.......for political reasons. IMO

In response to the other link just above.

This is from the article;

"The truth is that President Donald Trump is locked in an intense power struggle with Bill Gates, who is pushing his vaccines, which may not be available to the public until after November’s election. "


Bill Gates has no vaccines. He owns no patents on vaccines. The fact is that he purchases millions of doses of existing vaccines and donates them to poorer areas of the world.

Just an observation about the origins of your link.

National File is closely associated with Alex Jones and Info Wars. To me, that equals conspiracy theory stuff.

I think we agree more than disagree ,I'm not trying to demonize Gates if that's what it seems ,
Just trying to point out there is a conflict when it comes to Fauci calling the shots .
If the mainstream media actually investigated and weren't so anti anything Trump
I wouldn't be posting secondary sites .

I understand you aren't demonizing Gates . But there clearly is a large effort to promote untrue stuff about the guy. What I don't understand is WHY ?? Envy is the only answer I can come up with.

I still don't think Fauci has a conflict. He is a government employee. If Gates or anyone else allocates money to CDC or NIH Fauci's paycheck stays the same. I WON'T be surprised to see him retire and take a job at CNN or MSNBC at a much higher salary. But that won't have anything to do with Gates.

I agree with you about the MSM but there are still a lot of avenues for fairly reliable information available without going to the dark side

Those were the first 2 I found that didn't require a subscription ,
there was one from Forbes if you look it up .
Google is actively banning / removing anything that goes against the official narrative so those
probably won't be there for long .
As far as Fauci's pay not changing , kickbacks are real and very commonplace ,
not stating that that is happening without proof , but just saying .

I have never found Forbes to NOT have a political point of view. It's a a lot different publication than it was in the 1960's

Google is wholly untrustworthy IMO

I would be super amazed to find kickbacks where Gates is involved. Fauci maybe, but not Gates

I said Fauci , one post up .
What on earth could anyone offer Gates as a kickback ?

LOL TRUE.

I was assuming that you meant Fauci might be taking kickbacks from Gates. I don't see that as likely

Me either ,
but this whole thing stinks of a political stench ,
not saying the virus isn't real , but the response sure has been .

lots of questions and questionable behaviors

Purpose of vaccine is to trick body into developing antibodies to fight the virus. Getting sick and getting better also develops antibodies.

Dr. Birx was on TV today and mentioned that there are a lot of people who might be walking around that are asymptomatic and shedding virus, so would be a threat to us all. She had a bunch of other statistics too, which at this point are nice to know.....looking backwards to see how far off they have been.

What she didn't say, and nobody seems to know......is how many people.....just like the one's she was describing, have already been sick....recovered and never even knew they were sick. Those folks now have the antibodies, do not need a vaccine and are no longer a threat to themselves or anyone else.

What somebody in charge ought to be doing puking up is some statistics on antibody tests. At this state in the game, it is the only thing that matters.

What if upwards of 50% of the population has already been vaccinated by the virus itself?

One problem is that we do not at this point know whether the antibodies provide any protection at all, and if they do, for how long .

I think, based on what little I understand about the biology of any virus, and our bodies, it would be unusual if SOME amount of immunity was not generated by having the illness. But how long does it take to acquire that immunity, what degree of immunity does it provide, and how long does it last ?

I've also heard the tests are bad.......and granted, some of them probably are. But at least 5 have been approved by the FDA......and for monitoring the general population......accurate enough.

But as for the validity of the tests.......if a large number of folks have the antibodies.......it means the virus itself is not a threat to the overall population at large. Birx herself just today was showing numbers from the most heavily affected communities, and except for one local in NJ, most of them were 5% or less. That isn't enough threat to continue tanking the economy. Stock market rallied nearly 3% in one day earlier this week on announcement that a bio company had tested a vaccine and nobody (100%) did not get sick or have any adverse reactions. Buried deep was the fact that only 8 of 45 .....less than 20%.....had developed antibodies. Are those antibodies any different than what the virus itself develops?

So in all the noise about "RIGHTS" (constitutional)......what ought be argued is right......as in right and wrong. If a significant % of any population already has the antibodies.......then there is no justification for keeping things locked down. Things can be safely opened up.......as in wide open.

Unless a politician has an agenda to follow........tanking the economy on purpose. But that will be on them and it will be found out.

BTW, if it proves to be only 10%......or 80%.....in either case it matters. But what really matters is to know which. At this point in the game, nothing, absolutely nothing is more important.

We flush our toilets in the north and clean them to avoid the ring.