Home

Minnesota, am I understanding this right?

Posted By: kytrapper

Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 11:54 AM

Your governor has asked for a federal disaster relief of 15 million to rebuild what he let be destroyed and be burned.
Posted By: Snowpa

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:08 PM

He is a real no mind and guess what all the states that have that damage they allowed want relief
Posted By: lee steinmeyer

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:09 PM

Go pound sand, what a jerk!
Posted By: Law Dog

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:15 PM

They don’t protect it why should we pay for it, them (cities) that allowed it to go on did not see it as a problem when it was going on and failed to use the resources they already had or could of had available.
Posted By: kytrapper

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:24 PM

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mi...laration-george-floyd-riots-500m-damages
Posted By: walleye101

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:43 PM

Originally Posted by kytrapper
Your governor has asked for a federal disaster relief of 15 million to rebuild what he let be destroyed and be burned.


Yep, that sounds like our governor. So now if he does not get Federal money to clean up his mess it will be Trumps fault.
Posted By: mississippiposse

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:45 PM

They let I go on let them pay for it. Or even better leave it like it is
Posted By: Rat Masterson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:54 PM

Typical Democrat, needs to be saved from himself.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 12:56 PM

The shame of it all, U.S. taxpayers will pay for it anyway. It will likely be attached to spending bills.
Posted By: coyote addict

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 01:05 PM

Should be paid for out of politicians wages then we will see how arrogant they are going to be !
Posted By: Getting There

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 01:10 PM

Just more B.S.
Posted By: MJM

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 01:16 PM

It is a proven fact that the more money they handle the more they can skim off. If you have to tare down the economy, city to make a few million its all worth it.
Posted By: 330-Trapper

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 01:20 PM

He's unreal
Posted By: Suchlike2

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 01:47 PM

Yes. our Governor Goofy is quite the guy. What happened and was allowed to happen in Minneapolis was a disgrace to ALL the people of this state.
Posted By: Snare loop

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 01:56 PM

Tim Un Waltz leader of the twin cities has no problem asking rest of the state or other states to clean up his mess.
Posted By: Snare loop

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 02:00 PM

From the ashes will rise a glorious shining city made of highly flammable materials for the mental breakdown revolution.
Posted By: jeff karsten

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 02:09 PM

Probably needs cash for his volunteer police force
Posted By: hippie

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 02:10 PM

Tell Waltz we'll replace the statues but nothing else.
Posted By: Bogmaster

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 03:57 PM

Better yet Hippie--replace him.
Tom
Posted By: snowy

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 04:10 PM

With all the democratic power in the fed now, it wouldn't surprise me if the democratic don't get something passed to flip the bill. The blue party will do anything to get votes no matter even if it isn't good for the country.

They will bankrupt this country when they have full control and giving everything away. Doing that will take jobs and work ethic will be gone forever.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 04:37 PM

If they don't get their way I suggest they destroy the rest of their city.
Posted By: Law Dog

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 04:41 PM

Target is based out there it would be ironic if they had no stores in the city.
Posted By: Born

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 08:17 PM

I'm sure Waltz will find a way to put it to good use. You think?
Posted By: Born

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 08:23 PM

I worked at the Target headquarters for 7 years. I thought it was a terrific company then, they gave a lot of their new products lines to charity after viewing them at headquarters. They also had a CEO that donated to both political parties. Things changed with the new CEO's. I think there has been two since then.

The store in down town was just built when i was working down there, think its been there15 years.
Posted By: dewayne

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 08:45 PM

I think if I had a big company and they destroyed it I would walk away and leave the mess there.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 08:48 PM

The BLM and ANTIFA are so low that the homeless people are leaving to get away from them.
Posted By: rendezvous

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:10 PM

Originally Posted by kytrapper
Your governor has asked for a federal disaster relief of 15 million to rebuild what he let be destroyed and be burned.



You got it right, but your struggle is you don't understand it, most normal people don't!

Another thing that is hard to swallow is some of these leftist ran cities that have been going bankrupt for years are asking for a bail-out under the guise of the covid-19 situation...
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:16 PM

It seems federal piggy bank funds are at the root of too much effort; good, bad, and everything in between.
Federal Uncle Sam's Santa sleigh is hauling around way too much.
I pray a generation raises up to unhitch some reindeer, and lighten the load.
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:26 PM

Everybody's greedy for money in the States,the more they got the more they try to get,lol.
The whole culture revolves around money.
Me,I dont give a hoot about money.Long as I got a roof over my head and enough to pay a few bills I'm Stylin.
I'm gonna get rid of a bunch of money soon.
Posted By: KeithC

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:30 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Everybody's greedy for money in the States,the more they got the more they try to get,lol.
The whole culture revolves around money.
Me,I dont give a hoot about money.Long as I got a roof over my head and enough to pay a few bills I'm Stylin.


Canada's culture is the same, just not as successful.

Keith
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:33 PM

Some people,yes but most where I am dont have their life revolving around money.
See-there you equate sucess with money-its ingrained in you.You cant help it.
Money and material things has nothing to do with successfulness in life.
Posted By: KeithC

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Some people,yes but most where I am dont have their life revolving around money.
See-there you equate sucess with money-its ingrained in you.You cant help it.
Money and material things has nothing to do with successfulness in life.


I meant that Canada was less successful in all measures. Less creative, less inventive, less important, less necessary, less exciting, less meaningful, less looked up to, less copied and so on ad infinitum. Canada is not an important country like the US. It's not a bad country. Canada is just a sparsely populated insignificant one.

Keith
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:52 PM

Exactly how I like it.
The world needs more Canada.
We have always hit well above our weight on the world stage.From the fur trade to the development of the UN.
Posted By: Yukon John

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 09:53 PM

Originally Posted by mississippiposse
They let I go on let them pay for it. Or even better leave it like it is


Maybe it can be the new country's 1st monument!
Posted By: KeithC

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 10:01 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Exactly how I like it.
The world needs more Canada.
We have always hit well above our weight on the world stage.From the fur trade to the development of the UN.



The UN is terrible and needs disbanded.

Canada does not even have nuclear weapons to defend itself. Without the US protecting it, Canada would soon be part of China or Russia. Canada's selling itself to China right now.

Keith
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 10:11 PM

Canada could have nuclear weapons but is smart enough to not want them.Canada would never need nuclear weapons to defend itself.We could take on the largest over fattened countries like the US and china and russia thru guerilla warfare,something which the USa and the other bloated countries have not been sucessful at fighting.
The USA is an enemy of Canada,and tried to invade Canada twice, once in lower Canada in the late 1700's and again in 1812 in upper Canada and were soundly defeated in both wars.
It would be the same today.
You cannot even handle a bunch of cracked up hoodrats,what chance would you ever have against tough bush hardened Canadians.
You watch too many fantasy John Wayne movies,lol.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 10:15 PM

Originally Posted by KeithC
Originally Posted by Boco
Exactly how I like it.
The world needs more Canada.
We have always hit well above our weight on the world stage.From the fur trade to the development of the UN.



The UN is terrible and needs disbanded.

Canada does not even have nuclear weapons to defend itself. Without the US protecting it, Canada would soon be part of China or Russia. Canada's selling itself to China right now.

Keith

I heard that China offered $100 million for Canada but Trudeau thought that was too much.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 10:18 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Canada could have nuclear weapons but is smart enough to not want them.Canada would never need nuclear weapons to defend itself.We could take on the largest over fattened countries like the US and china and russia thru guerilla warfare,something which the USa and the other bloated countries have not been sucessful at fighting.
The USA is an enemy of Canada,and tried to invade Canada twice, once in lower Canada in the late 1700's and again in 1812 in upper Canada and were soundly defeated in both wars.
It would be the same today.
You cannot even handle a bunch of cracked up hoodrats,what chance would you ever have against tough bush hardened Canadians.
You watch too many fantasy John Wayne movies,lol.

Your enemy USA buys 84% of your exports. (your words)
tough bush hardened Canadiens....from Toronto and Montreal.........
Posted By: SnareLine

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/03/20 10:22 PM

Sounds about as bad as our Governor in NY
Posted By: trapperkeck

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 12:57 AM

I think that idiot should start a GoFundMe page and see how that works out.
Posted By: Grandpa Trapper

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 01:09 AM

Originally Posted by Gary Benson
Originally Posted by Boco
Canada could have nuclear weapons but is smart enough to not want them.Canada would never need nuclear weapons to defend itself.We could take on the largest over fattened countries like the US and china and russia thru guerilla warfare,something which the USa and the other bloated countries have not been sucessful at fighting.
The USA is an enemy of Canada,and tried to invade Canada twice, once in lower Canada in the late 1700's and again in 1812 in upper Canada and were soundly defeated in both wars.
It would be the same today.
You cannot even handle a bunch of cracked up hoodrats,what chance would you ever have against tough bush hardened Canadians.
You watch too many fantasy John Wayne movies,lol.

Your enemy USA buys 84% of your exports. (your words)
tough bush hardened Canadiens....from Toronto and Montreal.........


If that percentage figure is correct, it sounds like Canada depends a lot on the good old US of A and would be a really poor country without The United States.
Posted By: trapdog1

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 01:10 AM

Know why all the trees in the US lean north? Because CANADA SUCKS! grin
Posted By: yukonjeff

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 01:27 AM

Send the bill to George Soros. He paid for the destruction, might as well pay for the rebuild.
Posted By: trapperman222

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 02:13 AM

POS
Posted By: T-Rex

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 02:19 AM

Originally Posted by kytrapper
Your governor has asked for a federal disaster relief of 15 million to rebuild what he let be destroyed and be burned.
15 million is chicken feed. Walz ought to pay for it himself. I see on the internet, he is worth around $400 million. Not bad for a school teacher that spent his whole life in public service.
Posted By: Steven 49er

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 09:27 AM

400 million? Not a chance
Posted By: HobbieTrapper

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 11:12 AM

Originally Posted by Boco
Canada could have nuclear weapons but is smart enough to not want them.Canada would never need nuclear weapons to defend itself.We could take on the largest over fattened countries like the US and china and russia thru guerilla warfare,something which the USa and the other bloated countries have not been sucessful at fighting.
The USA is an enemy of Canada,and tried to invade Canada twice, once in lower Canada in the late 1700's and again in 1812 in upper Canada and were soundly defeated in both wars.
It would be the same today.
You cannot even handle a bunch of cracked up hoodrats,what chance would you ever have against tough bush hardened Canadians.
You watch too many fantasy John Wayne movies,lol.


Thermal Imaging has extremely reduced the effectiveness of guerilla warfare.
Posted By: trapperkeck

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 12:06 PM

I just read the same article, indicating Walz's net worth of 400 million. Amazing, what one can stash away as a congressman. On a $173K salary. Almost, unbelievable, in fact.
Posted By: Snowpa

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 03:49 PM

Do you know the difference between a bag of garbage and a girl from Canada , A bag of garbage gets took out once a week! laugh
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 03:52 PM

Originally Posted by HobbieTrapper
Originally Posted by Boco
Canada could have nuclear weapons but is smart enough to not want them.Canada would never need nuclear weapons to defend itself.We could take on the largest over fattened countries like the US and china and russia thru guerilla warfare,something which the USa and the other bloated countries have not been sucessful at fighting.
The USA is an enemy of Canada,and tried to invade Canada twice, once in lower Canada in the late 1700's and again in 1812 in upper Canada and were soundly defeated in both wars.
It would be the same today.
You cannot even handle a bunch of cracked up hoodrats,what chance would you ever have against tough bush hardened Canadians.
You watch too many fantasy John Wayne movies,lol.


Thermal Imaging has extremely reduced the effectiveness of guerilla warfare.


Not really,you were just defeated by stone age guerillas in afghanistan.

Impossible to win a war by spending millions to kill 3 or 4 fighters(maybe) at a time.And when you kill their kids and families at the same time it strengthens their resolve.
Posted By: Law Dog

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 04:06 PM

No Canadian fighters in Afghanistan?
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:14 PM

Naw we left after you nervous nellies started helping the other side by bombing Canadian soldiers that were fighting on the front line.
Posted By: HobbieTrapper

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:18 PM

Originally Posted by Boco


Not really,you were just defeated by stone age guerillas in afghanistan.

Impossible to win a war by spending millions to kill 3 or 4 fighters(maybe) at a time.And when you kill their kids and families at the same time it strengthens their resolve.


Not quite. We were defeated by the media. That was a nice try though.
Posted By: ky_coyote_hunter

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:27 PM

Wow, I just learned we were defeated by Afghanistan, Lol....We did a far sight better with them than the USSR did with them in the 70's.

The mujahideen handed it to the big red bear.

Sorry hater, baiter, Boco...The U.S.A. would hand it to the big red maple leaf in about a day.


Posted By: trapdog1

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:29 PM

Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
Wow, I just learned we were defeated by Afghanistan, Lol....We did a far sight better with them than the USSR did with them in the 70's.

The muhjadeen handed it to the big red bear.

Sorry hater, baiter, Boco...The U.S.A. would hand it to the big red maple leaf in about a day.




Seems kind of extreme when they let us go fishing up there without kicking their butts. grin
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:30 PM

As if.You cant even handle the chimps in Minneapolis,lol.
Posted By: trapdog1

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:31 PM

"As if"? What are you, a teenage girl? grin
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:32 PM

Thats your problem trapdog-you keep underestimating your enemys as well.
Posted By: ky_coyote_hunter

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:33 PM

We were nice to you on Canada day, hater, baiter, Boco...

Try to at least contain your hate for the U.S.A. on the 4th of July.
Posted By: trapdog1

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:34 PM

Enemies? Didn't think so.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:35 PM

Boco and James are surely brothers.
Posted By: Law Dog

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Naw we left after you nervous nellies started helping the other side by bombing Canadian soldiers that were fighting on the front line.



At least we don’t pay our terrorist for killing our guys like your little Princess has.
Posted By: Boco

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
We were nice to you on Canada day, hater, baiter, Boco...

Try to at least contain your hate for the U.S.A. on the 4th of July.

I was gonna be until someone started attacking Canada again.
And our women are better looking.
Most of your women look like the two heffers on the other thread.
Posted By: Law Dog

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:42 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
We were nice to you on Canada day, hater, baiter, Boco...

Try to at least contain your hate for the U.S.A. on the 4th of July.

I was gonna be until someone started attacking Canada again.




Yep your a giver. LOL
Posted By: walleye101

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:43 PM

I thought this thread was about Minnesota's crappy governor.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:50 PM

What's a heffer? Must be a Canadien thing.
Posted By: The Beav

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:53 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Originally Posted by ky_coyote_hunter
We were nice to you on Canada day, hater, baiter, Boco...

Try to at least contain your hate for the U.S.A. on the 4th of July.

I was gonna be until someone started attacking Canada again.
And our women are better looking.
Most of your women look like the two heffers on the other thread.



LOL I have driven through a few Canadian towns and saw all those good looking blue berry blonds sitting around.
Posted By: KeithC

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 05:59 PM

Letterkenny does have an awful lot of very fine looking Canadian women in it.

Keith
Posted By: chas3457

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 06:30 PM

Canadian women don't appear to be as well fed as some of our American girls. Must be a hard life up there. wink

[Linked Image]




Charlie
Posted By: T-Rex

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 07:26 PM

Give credit where credit is due.

Montreal has, in my limited experience, the best strip clubs in the world.
Posted By: Steven 49er

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 07:47 PM

Originally Posted by trapperkeck
I just read the same article, indicating Walz's net worth of 400 million. Amazing, what one can stash away as a congressman. On a $173K salary. Almost, unbelievable, in fact.


Link please.

I read one on the net that said that but I don't see how.

Other articles put it at 1 to 5 million
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/04/20 08:23 PM

Originally Posted by Steven 49er
Originally Posted by trapperkeck
I just read the same article, indicating Walz's net worth of 400 million. Amazing, what one can stash away as a congressman. On a $173K salary. Almost, unbelievable, in fact.


Link please.

I read one on the net that said that but I don't see how.

Other articles put it at 1 to 5 million

Probably not credible, but........
https://starsgab.com/tim-walz-biography/
Posted By: rendezvous

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/07/20 02:41 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
Canada could have nuclear weapons but is smart enough to not want them.Canada would never need nuclear weapons to defend itself.We could take on the largest over fattened countries like the US and china and russia thru guerilla warfare,something which the USa and the other bloated countries have not been sucessful at fighting.
The USA is an enemy of Canada,and tried to invade Canada twice, once in lower Canada in the late 1700's and again in 1812 in upper Canada and were soundly defeated in both wars.
It would be the same today.
You cannot even handle a bunch of cracked up hoodrats,what chance would you ever have against tough bush hardened Canadians.
You watch too many fantasy John Wayne movies,lol.





Canada doesn't have nuclear weapons because the United Kingdom has them! And also their greatest ally has nuclear weapons... the United States of America!

Ask isis how their gorilla warfare worked out for them.

Stop talking that sarcastic smack... just keep us fattened up on your tourtiere and poutine!
Posted By: Trapper7

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/07/20 04:17 PM

Originally Posted by walleye101
Originally Posted by kytrapper
Your governor has asked for a federal disaster relief of 15 million to rebuild what he let be destroyed and be burned.


Yep, that sounds like our governor. So now if he does not get Federal money to clean up his mess it will be Trumps fault.


The Mpls mayor is stupid, but on a Tuesday he requested Walz activate the National Guard to stop the rioting and terrorism. Walz didn't do anything until Trump threatened to send troops to stop the insanity. Then, on Friday Walz, a former National Guardsman himself, activated the Guards. That pretty much brought the terrorism to a halt. Had he done that when requested, Mpls wouldn't have nearly as much damage.

It was also Walz who in the early stages of Covid19 sent newly diagnosed patients to nursing homes where they infected so many older residents who died. 85% of deaths in MN from the virus are from nursing homes. Walz followed the same example of Governor Cuomo's by sending Covid patients into nursing homes.
Posted By: Rally

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/07/20 07:40 PM


Now Charlie, you gotta admit, there isn't anything in that picture some soap and a light switch won't clean up!!!
Posted By: Teacher

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/07/20 08:23 PM

It’s a darned if you do and darned if you don’t sort of world. If he asks and gets money, the businesses that arise from the ashes will be happy. And the votes will pour in because he tried to help those suffering the loss. If the money isn’t available, so be it. But if you don’t ask, you’ll never know if help could be on the way.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/07/20 08:31 PM

And if new businesses arise, it will give rioters something to do at least.
Posted By: BernieB.

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/07/20 10:23 PM

Originally Posted by chas3457
Canadian women don't appear to be as well fed as some of our American girls. Must be a hard life up there. wink

[Linked Image]




Charlie

Never seen a Canadian girl that skinny. Most of them can't fit through a doorway without lifting something up and pushing it through.
Posted By: Snowpa

Re: Minnesota, am I understanding this right? - 07/08/20 10:31 AM




LOL I have driven through a few Canadian towns and saw all those good looking blue berry blonds sitting around.[/quote]

Most could eat sweetcorn through a picket fence
© 2024 Trapperman Forums