Home

.

Posted By: bowhunter27295

. - 12/08/20 12:18 AM

.
Posted By: Sprung & Rusty

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:25 AM

We all know Trump won.
Posted By: yukon254

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:37 AM

The video is just one of many smoking guns. There are dozens of eyewitnesses. How many men have been executed based on just one eyewitness ? In this election there is a ton of circumstantial evidence on top of the eyewitnesses.
Posted By: warrior

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:40 AM

Originally Posted by bowhunter27295
So the video in Georgia is accurate then debunked then questionable. So who believes all those suitcases are not full of votes for biden and all is well? Circumstantial evidences points to questionable activities.


The fact that it was Fulton county is reason enough in my book. I trust nothing in that county.
Posted By: Marty

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:44 AM

most of the questionable activity was in inner cities where a certain ethanic group thinks they can do anything they want to do, legal or illegal, and get away with it.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:47 AM

I have to wonder how many lives were threatened to play by the new rules.
Posted By: Marty

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:48 AM

Wear a Trump hat and get a beat down, the new norm. Time to deal with those folks.
Posted By: cat daddy

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 12:55 AM

Trump Rocks!!
Posted By: keystone

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:06 AM

We’ve all been had, and they did it with the most incompetent politician is history! The guy can’t even put a sentence together!
Posted By: 330-Trapper

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:12 AM

Originally Posted by keystone
We’ve all been had, and they did it with the most incompetent politician is history! The guy can’t even put a sentence together!
Exactly what they want
Posted By: danvee

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:19 AM

Its over start trapping.
Posted By: Yes sir

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:21 AM

Originally Posted by danvee
Its over start trapping.

You ever wonder why our founders gave us the 2nd amendment?
Posted By: AntiGov

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:25 AM

Originally Posted by danvee
Its over start trapping.



You wish

It just started
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:27 AM

Danvee, Curious if moved to SE WY from somewhere else?
Posted By: AntiGov

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 01:29 AM

Originally Posted by Mark June
Danvee, Curious if moved to SE WY from somewhere else?



Absolutely

I asked him the same question in another thread ... No response
Posted By: danvee

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 02:56 AM

3rd generation if it matters Republican against T rump
Posted By: AntiGov

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 03:03 AM

Originally Posted by danvee
3rd generation if it matters Rino against T rump



That's what I thought
Posted By: charles

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 04:22 AM

Biden won almost all of the mail in votes because Trump badmouthed absentee voters so his voters stood in long lines without masks. Not surprising that the absentee votes favored Biden. Trump knew all along that those votes would be against He wasn’t surprised at all.
Posted By: AntiGov

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 04:26 AM

Biden won 100% of the illegal ballots ......
Posted By: Turtledale

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 02:29 PM

Originally Posted by charles
Biden won almost all of the mail in votes because Trump badmouthed absentee voters so his voters stood in long lines without masks. Not surprising that the absentee votes favored Biden. Trump knew all along that those votes would be against He wasn’t surprised at all.
. I stood in a short line with a mask and voted for President Trump. Absentee votes? Yes dead people are absent.
Posted By: Bruce T

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 03:07 PM

Originally Posted by AntiGov
Biden won 100% of the illegal ballots ......

Yep
Posted By: Wanna Be

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 03:15 PM

Folks “couldn’t” stand in line to vote for fear of Covid, but will stand in line for free food or checks?
They can “peacefully protest” in the streets, but can’t stand in the streets to vote?
They need an ID to go get that check, but it’s racist to provide an ID to vote?

Come on man!!!
Posted By: keystone

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:07 PM

Originally Posted by charles
Biden won almost all of the mail in votes because Trump badmouthed absentee voters so his voters stood in long lines without masks. Not surprising that the absentee votes favored Biden. Trump knew all along that those votes would be against He wasn’t surprised at all.


Your supposed to wear your mask over your mouth not your eyes! Take the blinders off!!
Posted By: cohunt

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:16 PM

None are so blind as those who will not see!
Posted By: BandB

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:21 PM

Originally Posted by charles
Biden won almost all of the mail in votes because Trump badmouthed absentee voters so his voters stood in long lines without masks. Not surprising that the absentee votes favored Biden. Trump knew all along that those votes would be against He wasn’t surprised at all.


Absentee and mass mail out voting are two completely different things. One has at least some form of verification. One is fraud in a thin disguise. Try learning the difference.
Posted By: AKAjust

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:24 PM

Its over. Trump won a questionable election in 2016. Did Hillery whimper and whine over it?
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:26 PM

Why does one major political party fight so hard for so little voter verification?
If their ideology is compelling, then sell that.

But it isn't.
So they don't.

So they attempt by any unscrupulous method to win.
Literally by hook or crook.

Many don't like unscrupulous in elections.
Many think it's fine.
So the battle wages.
Posted By: Kong

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:42 PM

For 4 years the left and FAKE NEWS tried their best to make us all believe that NOT ONE person who voted for Trump in 2016 would ever do so again. In 2020 Trump got another 10 million votes. How could all the socialists be SO WRONG ? Freedom Loving Patriots saw right through their plan !!

Big Don Trump got more votes in 2020 then any presidential candidate in history ! Real Numbers !!


Pretty much logically and mathematically impossible to say Biden got that many votes not campaigning at all.

His drive up rally’s had three cars each.

And they still want us to believe this happened.

President Trump, promises made, promises kept
Posted By: BernieB.

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 08:46 PM

Originally Posted by AKAjust
Its over. Trump won a questionable election in 2016. Did Hillery whimper and whine over it?


No she balled her eyes out and threw temper tantrums. Broke things, swore at everyone in sight, threw wine bottles on the floor.

The only ones who think the 2016 election was questionable are those who are ignorant about the electoral college.
Posted By: Grandpa Trapper

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 09:07 PM

Originally Posted by BernieB.
Originally Posted by AKAjust
Its over. Trump won a questionable election in 2016. Did Hillery whimper and whine over it?


No she balled her eyes out and threw temper tantrums. Broke things, swore at everyone in sight, threw wine bottles on the floor.

The only ones who think the 2016 election was questionable are those who are ignorant about the electoral college.


Clinton is still whining about it. Last I heard she had over 40 excuses why she didn’t win and none of them was blaming herself. It was everybody and everything else that caused her to lose. Now that is a poor loser!
Posted By: warrior

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 11:04 PM

Originally Posted by AKAjust
Its over. Trump won a questionable election in 2016. Did Hillery whimper and whine over it?


Yes
Posted By: Feedinggrounds

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/08/20 11:41 PM

Originally Posted by AKAjust
Its over. Trump won a questionable election in 2016. Did Hillery whimper and whine over it?

Still is last I knew, she was popping up like a three flush doodie! It's Hillary anyway.
Posted By: charles

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:04 AM

Trump beat himself, my friends. Sorry.
Posted By: Kong

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:08 AM

With the most votes in history...... he beat himself and he got more votes then anyone ever....... WOW
Posted By: Blaine County

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:11 AM

Originally Posted by danvee
Its over start trapping.


I agree. This is getting old.

Let's start complaining about President Biden. I am tired of talking about former President Trump.
Posted By: okcattrapper

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:16 AM

Originally Posted by Blaine County
Originally Posted by danvee
Its over start trapping.


I agree. This is getting old.

Let's start complaining about President Biden. I am tired of talking about former President Trump.



biden isn't President!
Posted By: charles

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:18 AM

Maybe his medical knowledge got in his way. People began to see through him for what he was. Let’s hope for better choices in four years.
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:19 AM

All in good time my pretty. All in good time. These things must be done delicately.

[Linked Image]
Posted By: Grandpa Trapper

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:28 AM

Originally Posted by Blaine County
Originally Posted by danvee
Its over start trapping.


I agree. This is getting old.

Let's start complaining about President Biden. I am tired of talking about former President Trump.
as

As hunters, trappers, gun owners and Americans, we are going to have plenty to complain about once the blundering moron and the evil smirking Harris takes over.
Posted By: AntiGov

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:34 AM

Originally Posted by charles
Maybe his medical knowledge got in his way. People began to see through him for what he was. Let’s hope for better choices in four years.

Hmm

Never thought of you as liberal

Did you ever think about the consequences of your Biden vote
Posted By: Nessmuck

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:36 AM

Originally Posted by AntiGov
Originally Posted by charles
Maybe his medical knowledge got in his way. People began to see through him for what he was. Let’s hope for better choices in four years.

Hmm

Never thought of you as liberal

Did you ever think about the consequences of your Biden vote


Beat me to it.....
Posted By: Anonymous

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:40 AM

Please understand a CORE tenet (underpinning) of a progressive.
They do not think what has not worked well in the past will not work IF ONLY they are put in charge.
The plan is perfect. It just didn't have the correct people leading the plan.
Time and time and time again progressives think they are the smart one in the room and need to drive the bus.

It is.....
a lack of empathy, humility, and aversion to authority.
Posted By: rvsask

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:31 PM

This last post is funny. Switch the words liberals with Republicans, the word Trump with Biden, the news stations and it could have been written by a Democrat. For what it’s worth I’m neither obviously but am intrigued by the plight of US politics and people.
Posted By: Diggerman

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:35 PM

Originally Posted by charles
Maybe his medical knowledge got in his way. People began to see through him for what he was. Let’s hope for better choices in four years.

Judge not, lest.............
Posted By: Boco

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:35 PM

I wonder how long before terrorism takes root in the USA?
I say by next summer there will be some terrorism in the USA.
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.
Posted By: Diggerman

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:37 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
I wonder how long before terrorism takes root in the USA?
I say by next summer there will be some terrorism in the USA.

You are a year late with that assumption.
Posted By: Boco

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:38 PM

Originally Posted by Diggerman
Originally Posted by Boco
I wonder how long before terrorism takes root in the USA?
I say by next summer there will be some terrorism in the USA.

You are a year late with that assumption.


Obviously you dont know the meaning.
Posted By: yukon254

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 02:43 PM

Originally Posted by rvsask
This last post is funny. Switch the words liberals with Republicans, the word Trump with Biden, the news stations and it could have been written by a Democrat. For what it’s worth I’m neither obviously but am intrigued by the plight of US politics and people.


I disagree. How many mainstream media stories were proven false during Trumps term?? To many to count. It doesnt matter which side of the fence you are on, I dont see how anyone can realistically dispute the fact that the media for the most part has become nothing more than a propaganda machine for the left. I would include most of the Canadian media in that statement as well. There were and are some serious questions about Joe Biden's involvement with his sons business, china, the Ukraine, and other countries but the mainstream media wont touch it, and big tech censors any stories that do come out. Then of course there was the very credible lady that accused Biden of sexual misconduct. Why did that get swept under the rug?? Its disgusting really. The media is doing all of this blatantly and anyone who believes half of what most of them say is a fool. There are some reporters out there who try to do the right thing, but you have to look for them.
Posted By: cohunt

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 04:19 PM

Just looked over the Minnesota results from this years election. Perhaps the most surprising statistic was that those civic minded citizens we all saw burning and looting their major city last summer turned their lives around and accomplished the highest voter turnout percentage of any state in the union. Some on here will likly say, good for them!
Posted By: Bruce T

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 04:22 PM

Originally Posted by cohunt
Just looked over the Minnesota results from this years election. Perhaps the most surprising statistic was that those civic minded citizens we all saw burning and looting their major city last summer turned their lives around and accomplished the highest voter turnout percentage of any state in the union. Some on here will likly say, good for them!

Then bury their heads back into the sand.
Posted By: warrior

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 04:24 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
I wonder how long before terrorism takes root in the USA?
I say by next summer there will be some terrorism in the USA.
One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter.


Already here. It goes by many names.

Antifa
BLM
DNC
ELF
Posted By: Trapper7

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 04:26 PM

When an unknown whistleblower came forward with damaging info on Trump, the democrats praised the person for being patriotic and courageous.
Now, numerous whistleblowers have come forward with first hand info on election fraud, and the democrats refer to them as illegitimate.
Posted By: Pete in Frbks

Re: Statistical impossibility - 12/09/20 04:36 PM

[Linked Image]
© 2024 Trapperman Forums