Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/02/2112:14 PM
Quote
Next thing we know, he'll be running for Congress. As a Trump follower, probably.
Why run for Congress, doubtful anything useful can be done there. The U.S. Congress, both blue and red, are mostly corrupt and controlled by the special interests. It was very unfortunate that when presidents were term-limited that it wasn't also done for Congress. But, because a Constitutional amendment usually starts in Congress, that will never happen, especially now. No, the Legislative branch will most likely fall under its own corrupt weight but it probably won't be pretty for a lot of people...
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2102:00 AM
There's a lot of loser libs on this thread, hopeless types with no fight in 'em. It's a sad day when some of you folks even want to claim to be Americans, let alone Patriots. But then, ther farther south you go in Minnesota, the more liberal the mindset, even in the red areas. The indoctrination mindset is apparent to anyone from the far north.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2102:18 AM
Originally Posted by James
Ha, Ha -- tricky man! Challenging someone to prove a negative.
Either a fool or a con man. He knows his money is safe.
Jim
He's a millionaire for more than one reason, one being that he's good with numbers. I believe it isnt in you to litsten to him much, But...I have, and Id say he's a genius, and can operate on a few levels. He's quick, and has his head about him. I dont think he's a business failure, nor is he done.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2102:42 AM
Surely he's smart enough to see what's wrong with his bet, right? I mean, I know he says some goofy stuff, but he was smart enough to start a successful business, surely he sees the flaw in his offer.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2112:34 PM
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2106:46 PM
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Somewhere between 3% and 27% of democrats believe the election was stolen, depending on the poll and 29% to 34% of independents.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2109:38 PM
Originally Posted by KeithC
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Somewhere between 3% and 27% of democrats believe the election was stolen, depending on the poll and 29% to 34% of independents.
Keith
Makes sense because not all democrats or independents despise Trump like James does.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/09/2111:41 PM
Almost none of the multitude of news articles written on what percentage of people believe the election was stolen give you the questions that were actually asked. With the huge percentage range of answers between polls, I am sure many of the questions asked were very leading to get the results the pollsters wanted.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2112:15 AM
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Thing is, fifty states certified their election results in accordance with their law. There is a presumption that the state officials doing the certifying did their duty.
To show fraud in these circumstances, you have to offer clear and convincing evidence. No one has ever done this for the 2020 election. Mike, where are you?
We've seen no clear and convincing evidence. Instead, all we have are the claims of fraud by the Great One--which are enough for mindless followers, maybe, but not for anyone using their head as God intended.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2112:23 AM
Originally Posted by James
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Thing is, fifty states certified their election results in accordance with their law. There is a presumption that the state officials doing the certifying did their duty.
To show fraud in these circumstances, you have to offer clear and convincing evidence. No one has ever done this for the 2020 election. Mike, where are you?
We've seen no clear and convincing evidence. Instead, all we have are the claims of fraud by the Great One--which are enough for mindless followers, maybe, but not for anyone using their head as God intended.
Jim
Where was the clear and convincing evidence in the Russia collusion investigation that went on for 4 years? You don’t have to answer that James, we already know the answer!
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2112:46 AM
Originally Posted by James
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Thing is, fifty states certified their election results in accordance with their law. There is a presumption that the state officials doing the certifying did their duty.
To show fraud in these circumstances, you have to offer clear and convincing evidence. No one has ever done this for the 2020 election. Mike, where are you?
We've seen no clear and convincing evidence. Instead, all we have are the claims of fraud by the Great One--which are enough for mindless followers, maybe, but not for anyone using their head as God intended.
Jim
There probably was a time that both state and Federal officials doing their duty fairly and objectively was a reasonable presumption. Anyone with their eyes open from the beginning of the Trump presidency, and throughout, should recognize that is no longer the case.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2112:50 AM
On Saturday we received a jury notice for my father-in-law in the mail. My wife called today to see if they needed a copy of his death certificate (he died in September 2019) to remove him from the juror lists (and voter rolls), only to be told she must have the wrong year of death as he voted in 2020!!! I guess if he died in September 2020 it would be OK if he voted in November 2020.. Wife said to the lady on the phone " he was my father and I am pretty sure when he died". Lady said "we'll remove him" and hung up. My Own Note: probably first time he ever voted for a democrat!!! My father died in January 2021, will be interesting to see if he votes this year. I guess in New Jersey it is easier to vote if you are dead because as I stated on this forum, in another thread previously, neither my nor my wife's votes were counted in the 2020 election according to the NJ website.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2101:08 AM
Originally Posted by eric space
On Saturday we received a jury notice for my father-in-law in the mail. My wife called today to see if they needed a copy of his death certificate (he died in September 2019) to remove him from the juror lists (and voter rolls), only to be told she must have the wrong year of death as he voted in 2020!!! I guess if he died in September 2020 it would be OK if he voted in November 2020.. Wife said to the lady on the phone " he was my father and I am pretty sure when he died". Lady said "we'll remove him" and hung up. My Own Note: probably first time he ever voted for a democrat!!! My father died in January 2021, will be interesting to see if he votes this year. I guess in New Jersey it is easier to vote if you are dead because as I stated on this forum, in another thread previously, neither my nor my wife's votes were counted in the 2020 election according to the NJ website.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2103:02 AM
Originally Posted by Boco
Somebody said that they think he is back on the crack pipe.
The only way you could know that, is if James pm'ed you and said he sold some of his to Mr. Lindell....but, we know James aint never coming off his supply, so this is debunked.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2103:26 AM
Originally Posted by KeithC
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Somewhere between 3% and 27% of democrats believe the election was stolen, depending on the poll and 29% to 34% of independents.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2103:44 AM
Originally Posted by loosegoose
Originally Posted by KeithC
Somewhere between 3% and 27% of democrats believe the election was stolen, depending on the poll and 29% to 34% of independents.
Keith
Source for this claim?
I read a whole lots of different sources. Spend 3 seconds of your time and search the terms "poll on percentage of Americans who think the election was stolen" without the quotation marks. You will get more results than you can read. Similar searches will lead to even more results. A huge number of newspapers, online news sources, local news networks and major news networks have done polls on this. The polls have been conducted since the election and more continue to be conducted. Some sources have conducted multiple polls from November to now.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2104:14 AM
Internut sources are all hogwash.Written by anyone with absolutely no credentials or fake credentials. Its laughable how people believe all the bs on the internut,lol.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2104:24 AM
Originally Posted by Boco
Internut sources are all hogwash.Written by anyone with absolutely no credentials or fake credentials. Its laughable how people believe all the bs on the internut,lol.
There are very reputable internet sources, including all of the world's great learning institutions. You do still have to consider the veracity of the source. For instance if the source claims there were no Canadian anthem kneelers, Canadian riots and other like nonsense, when there is reams of written, photographic and video evidence, readily available that there was, you know that source is not trustworthy and reliable.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2104:41 AM
Originally Posted by Boco
You need to get out of your mammas basement and get out and see stuff for yourself instead of lapping up all the phony baloney.
I gave irrefutable proof that you were wrong today, multiple times and have done so multiple times in the past. There is lots of things wrong with the US and Canada. There is no need for you to constantly pass fiction as fact and you should feel ashamed to do so.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2108:44 AM
Originally Posted by James
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Thing is, fifty states certified their election results in accordance with their law. There is a presumption that the state officials doing the certifying did their duty.
To show fraud in these circumstances, you have to offer clear and convincing evidence. No one has ever done this for the 2020 election. Mike, where are you?
We've seen no clear and convincing evidence. Instead, all we have are the claims of fraud by the Great One--which are enough for mindless followers, maybe, but not for anyone using their head as God intended.
Jim
Did James just invoke "God"? So is the non believer now crediting "God", someone he don't believe in, as being responsible for his "Smartness" Lol Lol!!! That explains it all right there....
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/10/2108:15 PM
Quote
You need to get out of your mammas basement and get out and see stuff for yourself instead of lapping up all the phony baloney.
I think there are 2 Bocos. One who is an actual and quite knowledgeable trapper. The other is an actor who spits out cliches on a nearly daily basis, although I have to admit, the above one is pretty dam good Or maybe just a major split personality...
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/11/2108:32 PM
Well there is absolute proof provided through public record that Dominion altered the software just after the election which deleted the votes and a forensic audit will not be able to be performed or more difficult.
So while our brave military were away in foreign lands fighting to secure the rights of their citizens for a free and fare election we have been invaded by enemies within working to turn a country to Communism......Not my words just agreed with one of the witnesses!
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/11/2109:38 PM
If this administration is not commies. I ask you this? Why on earth When we have reached oil independence under the past administration. Would current administration reach out to OPEC yesterday. And ask OPEC to ramp up oil production???? Simple. To cripple our American oil producers.
Re: Mike must be pretty sure of his findings! - 08/12/2102:04 AM
Originally Posted by James
Originally Posted by walleye101
Those who support Trump will always question the outcome of the 2020 election. Those who despise Trump are certain that the outcome was legitimate. What's unfortunate is that there most likely will never be an objective unbias investigation.
Thing is, fifty states certified their election results in accordance with their law. There is a presumption that the state officials doing the certifying did their duty.
To show fraud in these circumstances,you have to offer clear and convincing evidence. No one has ever done this for the 2020 election. Mike, where are you?
We've seen no clear and convincing evidence. Instead, all we have are the claims of fraud by the Great One--which are enough for mindless followers, maybe, but not for anyone using their head as God intended.
Jim
Yep very true excellent point. But if I remember correctly, they couldn't and didn't convict Al Capone on criminal charges. there was no clear and convincing evidence..