I was a bit surprised when our friends to the north went full commie on the truckers. After reading some comments on this subject I realize it’s all over up there. Sad
Is it Full commie because I question the irony of one party pointing fingers at the other for the same thing they like to do?
Why is it strange that I wonder about electing someone to the Supreme Court gets jeers of being soft on porn but when the glorious ex elector’s ex staffer gets a dozen years for child porn ,…. Crickets?
What’s with it that someone might support lgbqt and automatically be deemed a groomer, while at the same time Roy Moore gets endorsed by the glorious elector?
If Qanon says the Demoncrats are running a pedophile ring out of a pizzeria who am I to disagree but how come that negates an actual sex with a minor investigation in Mart Gaetz?
If being open to discussing sexuality in a classroom in Florida or anywhere else is grooming, why does that make everyone forget about the Jim Jordan scandal involving 177 male students?
If Fox News says Boebert is right about Christian family values then isn’t it weird that it’s automatically Faux News when brought to light that’s her husband served time for showing his unit to minors and even was charged for assaulting her when she was pregnant is Faux News?
Is it Strange to wonder why MTG can accuse fellow republicans of being groomer supporters for backing KBJ but stay silent on the fact that Florida Republicans (the don’t say gay leaders) are accepting large financial donations from an ex congressman who resigned after sending sexually explicit messages to underage boys? Or is it all just very normal in the family values Party?
Isn’t it worth wondering how nearly a quarter of Republicans actually think the government, media and financial world are controlled by Satan worshipping pedophiles because Qanon says so but those same folks don’t at all question why they actually believe this ridiculous thing called Qanon? Lol
I’m sorry for nothing but questions, I realize now that I have come across much like Tucker in terms of how my dialogue is conveyed. But there’s nothing wrong with speaking in only questions,….is there? Clearly people eat it up, …don’t they?