Home

Here we go again:

Posted By: Marty

Here we go again: - 05/28/22 05:58 PM

HARRISBURG — A federal appeals court ruled Friday that election officials in one Pennsylvania county must count legally cast mail ballots signed by a voter even if they lack a date on the outer envelope.

Though the ruling specifically targeted a 2021 local judicial election, it could have far-reaching implications in a few of this year’s primary races — including the closely watched Republican U.S. Senate contest.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...mp;cvid=4ee8067f57e44afcb1cab238bb35bdf1
Posted By: Sharon

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 06:19 PM

Marty, or anyone, what happened to the Oz count ? Last I saw, they were still counting ?
Posted By: Marty

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 06:25 PM

I have no idea. I have given up on the belief that we will ever have an actual fair election ever again. Have a good holiday weekend.
Posted By: Sharon

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 06:28 PM

Thank you, Marty. You as well.
Posted By: hippie

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 06:32 PM

Going to a recount, must start by June and be done by the 7th. Oz is around 1k ahead.

They were fighting over those messed up ballots but looks like they're going to count all them. Mail in ballots should be stopped for all but Military and good reason!!!!!!
Posted By: Sharon

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 06:43 PM

Thanks, Racer Man . I have been out of town a bit and wondering how it turned out.

Typical .....doesn't surprise me.
Posted By: CTRAPS

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 07:31 PM

These are the kinds of things that many people have grown tired of. If a rule or regulation can be changed or amended after fact, will anything be safe from now on?

How many cases or elections will now possibly be contested due to this ruling?
Posted By: Boco

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 08:02 PM

They need to go to all internet voting.
Quicker.More accurate.
If they can do banking on line, online voting should be a piece of cake.
Posted By: poconobear

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 08:03 PM

Once again, PA is an embarrassment. We still can’t get an election right
It’s absolutely amazing that we messed up ballots they can’t decide what to do with
Maybe they should take a page out of the game commissions book. We have a detailed process to mail in our antlerless license applications. If one part of the application isn’t completed properly, the application is rejected
Seems to me it’s simply that easy
Posted By: jk

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 09:51 PM

Mister Boco, Banks are a private organization with a board of directors, investors and labor unions to answer to. Elections are run by the government, there is no checking on each other. It is not the voter that counts it who counts the votes that count in elections.......jk
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 09:53 PM

Originally Posted by CTRAPS
These are the kinds of things that many people have grown tired of. If a rule or regulation can be changed or amended after fact, will anything be safe from now on?

How many cases or elections will now possibly be contested due to this ruling?


No.
All of them.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 09:53 PM

I don't think we'll ever see a FAIR election again.
Posted By: warrior

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 10:09 PM

Originally Posted by Boco
They need to go to all internet voting.
Quicker.More accurate.
If they can do banking on line, online voting should be a piece of cake.


And how major hacks have happened to the banks?
Posted By: 330-Trapper

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 10:31 PM

Originally Posted by warrior
Originally Posted by Boco
They need to go to all internet voting.
Quicker.More accurate.
If they can do banking on line, online voting should be a piece of cake.


And how major hacks have happened to the banks?

Exactly
Posted By: Dirty D

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 11:42 PM

Once again the court violates the law.

The law states they must be dated. If they are not they are illegal ballots, they should be tossed out. Simple as that.
Posted By: Marty

Re: Here we go again: - 05/28/22 11:44 PM

Ya'll need to get that judges home addy, go there and protest loudly...for days on end.
Posted By: Gary Benson

Re: Here we go again: - 05/29/22 12:01 AM

Or go at night, and protest once.
Posted By: Marty

Re: Here we go again: - 05/29/22 12:29 AM

(wsyx columbus)

After the Ohio Supreme Court once again struck down General Assembly maps approved by the Ohio Redistricting Commission, federal judges have ordered Secretary of State Frank LaRose to hold a second primary election using maps that have already twice been rejected by the high court.

Earlier this week, the court rejected a fifth set of maps approved by the redistricting commission and ordered commissioners to come up with new maps by June 3.

A federal court previously said if the commission could not come up with an acceptable map by May 28, it would adopt the already rejected maps.

On Friday, the court said the state has failed to act, and "Assuming no map is approved by midnight on Saturday, May 28, we order Secretary of State Frank LaRose to push back Ohio's state primaries to August 2, 2022, and to implement Map 3 for this year's elections only."

The court said it has refrained in the past from intervening in Ohio's state elections.

Given the current situation, the court said it "chose the best of our bad options."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LaRose has been trying to clean up election fraud, to the best of my knowledge.
Posted By: Marty

Re: Here we go again: - 05/29/22 12:37 AM

(wlky louisville)

Ray Barker filed a lawsuit after losing last week's Democratic primary to District 5 Councilmember Donna Purvis by 35 votes.
Barker claims someone at the board of elections told him after the polls had closed he had won by 12 votes.
But the next morning, he learned a memory stick for the Whitney Young precinct had turned up and put Purvis ahead.
Barker claims there were 68 more votes counted than there are Democratic registered voters in that precinct.
A recanvas of the race by the board of elections did not change the results.

We reached out to Purvis but she declined to comment.
© 2024 Trapperman Forums