I listen to NPR every day and get a taste of the BBC there. The CBC is the same. They all have excellent programming but they all have a very liberal bias. I know within minutes of tuning into NPR, I'll be hearing something about climate change or the LGTBQXYZ movement. Every time.

You always make a false comparison by implying there is no difference between the two stations. And I say to you again: FOX is more balanced than any other station. They have regular liberal commentators on that I can name. But, you can't name any regular conservatives on any of the other phony news stations. I have challenged you on this before and you never respond because you can't. The other fake news stations don't have any regular conservatives on in their programing. So, when you compared these two stations, you're just blowing smoke.

Making supper the other night I flipped on the evening news. It was one of the big 3. Any way Jorge Diaz segued from one liberal cause to another. When it got to the plight of the Kenyan gay community I just turned it off and haven’t been back. We have some many problems and so many things to celebrate here and they’re cramming gay rights from a third world country down our gullets. Ree dickulous

If you can ignore the liberal bias it is good, in-depth reporting. Ar least much more in-depth than you get from the cable news networks that play sound bites and gloss over almost every story. Like wetdog said, Fox does the same thing as MSNBC and CNN. They just give it a conservative spin. I can't stand the way Fox morning anchors interview anybody. They ask a question then hurry the person along by going, "yeah", "ahuh" or just talking over the interviewee. More than once I caught myself yelling at the TV, "You ask him a question, now shut the %$#@ up and let him answer." Gotta wrap it up so we can break for commercials every two minutes.

CNN and MSNBC I check in on for a couple of minutes over breakfast just to make sure they haven't changed formats and are still actively trying to destroy the POTUS and anyone who supports him.

Someone with an answer can spit it out, if they start stalling so they can make something up then they are doing right by moving along. lol

Nobody wants to see a stupid person suffer.

It's not like that Hobbie. Sometimes I actually want to hear the answer and those jerks keep interrupting. Why even ask the question if you're not going to shut up and listen to the answer?

Not every question can be answered with a ten-second sound bite.

lol

Solution... Fox News!

Only idjits would watch" news" stations that have to "jussie up" their stories to keep them focused.

OAN for news..

I get most of my news the old fashion way. I go hang out at the local hardware store. Farmers, plumbers and builders all cycle through in about 40mins and you will hear it all. lol

All a bogus hoax I can tell 90%ofthe time who will win

Exactly! Libmentallychallenged is what he should have used. Tomato, pototto. Big difference.

It is a big difference. Think of all the hero vets who took brain damage fighting for your butt. They don’t need to see this garbage. It’s not a matter of political correctness when you start messing with cognitively impaired folk.

I get all my news and info from watching the non biased opinions on the View.

I don't know if O'Reilly was worse than Hannity in that regard. They get these phenomenal guests on their shows and don't allow them to speak at length. They seem to have an overwhelming urge to prove how smart they are. Hannity is a great patriot but he's no Mensa candidate.

LOL at the CNN/MSNBC comment. True.

I can't stand listening to O'Reilly or Hannity for the reasons you just mentioned. Also, Hannity just goes on and on in that extremely irritating way of his. My wife likes to watch his show and gets mad when I point out his sensationalist BS.

Very true, I could not watch O'rielly.

Neil Cavuto is a great host and plays the devils advocate most of the time. Very fair and balanced and I don't think he likes Trump to much and I know the guests he has on don't like Trump much. To reiterate, 90% of Trump coverage on the other alphabet channels is negative and if you can't see that I'm surprised you can turn on your TV.

Let me tell you something Hoss. I will directly refer to liberal reprobates as I see fit. If that offends you personally, then I can conclude that I have made a direct hit on one of my targets.
You can try to hide behind the mentally challenged, and military heroes wounded in battle just as you would hide behind your mother's skirt, but one fact remains. You do not have a leg to stand on defending the likes of the media, specifically CBS.
I'll stand by while you prepare your lecture demeaning my use of "leg to stand on", as insensitive to wounded heroes.
You need to work on your game. Did you misplace your Talking Points pamphlet?