No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: NO Antlers either says California [Re: PBS] #6617649
09/15/19 01:46 PM
09/15/19 01:46 PM
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,350
se South Dakota
NonPCfed Offline
trapper
NonPCfed  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,350
se South Dakota
Its time to canvass all the state legislatures to see if there 3/4th of them that are willing to ask the state of California to leave the union via a Constitutional Convention and then kick Cali out. May keep some of the key military bases for U.S. defense. The citizens of the central valley and high desert can fight it out with the coastals to see if they can succeed or not to create there own state. I'd help fund that effort. This would free the rest of us of their state government's constant anti-American freedom attempts. Might free us from the Silicon "Valley" tech giants as well and go back to what internet platforms were supposed to be that follow the U.S. Constitution. The Cali coastals and the state gov apparatus in Sacramento are nothing but a cancer in the body of America!!


"And God said, Let us make man in our image �and let them have dominion �and all the creatures that move along the ground".
Genesis 1:26
Re: NO Antlers either says California [Re: Snowpa] #6617736
09/15/19 04:35 PM
09/15/19 04:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 26
NM
W
Wronganswer Offline
trapper
Wronganswer  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 26
NM
Originally Posted by Snowpa
Originally Posted by Finster
[Linked Image]

We would have to spend a lot of money to build the wall


I say we let the Mexicans, El Salvidorians and Guatamalens in for now. A wall between us and California is far more important. The illegals mostly just want a better life, the Californians demand compliance with all the tenants of Communism. California is more dangerous to the US Constitution than all 11 million illegals in the US......actually getting rid of CA would probably reduce the number of illegals in the new USA by 4-5 million!! Two birds with one stone!!

Removing CAs electoral votes might make it nearly impossible for a facist democrat to be elected as president in the future too! Im not seeing a down side here....

Re: NO Antlers either says California [Re: PBS] #6617793
09/15/19 05:50 PM
09/15/19 05:50 PM
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
D
Donnersurvivor Offline
trapper
Donnersurvivor  Offline
trapper
D

Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 4,585
MN
California used to be a conservative stronghold, what happened? Why do you not think Texas will follow California in the coming years? What is the difference?

Re: NO Antlers either says California [Re: Wild_Idaho] #6618240
09/16/19 08:41 AM
09/16/19 08:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,474
MN
W
walleye101 Offline
trapper
walleye101  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,474
MN
Originally Posted by Wild_Idaho
So let me get this straight... in their warped minds they think that by being the one and only state to ban trapping that they are somehow the heroes in all this? That all the other 49 states are somehow wrong?


They don't intend to be the one and only state, just set the example for the others. If you don't think there are plenty of liberals in the other 49 states that wouldn't hesitate to do the same you are wrong. How you vote matters.

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread