That's nine total counting Texas and Louisiana.

Take me to your leader Savell (as my hands are in the air)......

Sadly, Nevada will not be among them.

How does Texas et al get past the argument that they should have complained (filed suit) before the election, as opposed to complaining after the vote was taken and they don't like the result?

Jim

Pretty obvious that prior to the election they would have had no standing. Catch 22. November 2 = no standing. November 4. = too late. Total = no due process

Is a state a "person" for purposes of due process and equal protection?

Jim

I think it all turns on whether the states can show fraud. Otherwise, the harm they suffered is just speculation.

Jim

Is a corporation ?

You're the lawyer or did we not yet haves states when you sat for the bar.

Yes, the SC says, a corporation is a person. For at least some DP and EQ purposes.

Jim

Why should I provide any answers, when we have so many lawyers here already?

And when my opinions are immediately rejected?

Jim

I don't. But you are the expert here. I think it is enough to show that these states violated the constitution whether there was fraud or not

how can they show fraud if they dont review the evidence?? everything i read... testimonies affidavids dominion servers havent even been reviewed cases get thrown out by the courts with out hearing them!!

I think it will be necessary for these states to show actual harm by, for instance, showing there was sufficient fraud to change the outcome in the defendant-states.

What other harm does Texas have? I can't think of any.

I'd want to read the briefs and make check some of the cited authorities. If I saw the plaintiffs' complaint, I could better tell what the issues are. I'd especially be interested in the relief requested.

Jim

"Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States."

If this is true it should not be hard to find ballots from dead people among those tens of millions of mail out ballots. I believe some of those have already been exposed. Or then is it not enough fraud?

This case should excite Constitutional law professors and scholars all over the country! It's pretty rare for one state to sue another.


Jim

The arguement is not fraud but that the states changed election law by executive action or court decree not by legislative action as required under the Constitution. That others took advantage of the changes to commit fraud is moot.

Any speculation of fraud merely supports the argument that election law can only be mandated by the legislature not local election officials or courts.

Read the complaint.