Then go watch the musings and show me where the deductions are wrong. Stop talking and start walking.

I am the one looking for attention, huh?

Masks are a choice for now. Inform yourself. There is a lot of info out there.

Wearing the blaze orange is a law. Wearing a mask isn't.

Nope. That is your opinion. I want you to prove the doctors wrong that I based my opinion on.

"May not" is a sissy lawyer's way out.

Like you just said, you are a pro at cross examining people with PhD's.

Hey, Blaine County, you ever published in a peer-reviewed journal, not counting a law journal?

I have, on both ends of the process, as a lead author and as a reviewer. Not in health or medicine but the process is basically the same. Its a good system, but its still human based and the foibles of people still apply. My research doesn't have big money in play, health and medicine often do. Medical articles are often very short and often done quick, although some are long-term and very extensive, so the context of the research matters. I've dealt with journalists before, they run the gradient of being as smart as your PhDs to being fairly dumb-- can those folks translate what an article is saying in the proper context? Don't know, might, might not. If science is "settled", then why are there hundreds of peer-reviewed journals and more pop up all the time...? 1) because science is supposed to be about "inquiry" and that isn't supposed to end, and 2) journals make money in publishing. The attacks and shaming of any covid remedy besides new drugs and vaccines worth hundreds or millions and billions of $$ smells bad. Big pharma isn't going to make more money on treating covid with cheap, already here meds.

Do you remember the "VA hyrdoxychlorquine study" that helped prove that old drug wasn't any good against covid...? I read that one, all of about 1800 words.It was an example of "data mining" of medical records, the researchers never saw or touched those patients, they just ran their algorithms against certain key terms or words. The researchers were never asked certain specific questions, according to my physician brother, who was a VA doc at the time, that would have provide more context to patient outcomes. Or the journal editors overrode peer-review questions, in most journals we never know if this happens or not. In short articles, there's not enough word space to ask more than a few questions, so again, total context, within reason, isn't fully explored.

There's been more "published" on this one disease in a little over a year's of its "life" than most in decades. Why do you think that is, could it be to give the big money and power grabbing "cover"...? Can't create a cultural of fear and then repression if the evil disease can be beat, especially if caught early and aggressively treated, with generic drugs and treatments. Call me cynically paranoid, that's ok, I'll take that as a badge of honor. Next month I will mark the 1 year anniversary of being kicked out of my office, I been in the building twice since then, and not in months. Last week my county had ONE death attributed to covid. And we're in a state that hasn't had any real lockdowns and civil liberties trampled. No culture of fear and repression created in the last year...? I think not..

Now you want after college? I'll be cross examining an expert with a PhD in engineering bright an early tomorrow morning in an environmental case.

Would you maybe provide a hint as to your client? I would like to send a copy of this thread. I feel he should get a refund from one of the most inept "lawyers" I have ever seen in my life and congrat's, you have beaten some stiff competition.

Ha! Aren't you supposed to be planning your imaginary High School?

For reference with masks, most of the masks given out by retailers and worn by most people are the 3M type masks that filter particles of 4.0 microns.

The best masks worn in hospitals for average use is made for TB and screens out 95% of particles down to .3 microns.

All respiratory viruses are +/- .1 micron. This includes influenza, cold and........... Covid.

It is the equivalent of trying to catch a golf ball with a net with meshes the size of softballs. Makes you wonder why fauxi is telling people to wear two masks and three is actually better. Hmmmm? Why now? Why not before November? All of a sudden they had an epiphany? All of a sudden they understand measurements?

I see zero use in wearing masks so I am done with them unless asked to wear them by a specific business.

Virologists wear completely contained SCBA suits with air. Wonder why?

Loose, if it was so important it would be a law. Let's be honest.

No just hopefully influence and inform. It has made me search even harder for facts and made me much better informed.

Did your team win the super bowl?