It's accurate. If I wasn't supporting and raising my kids I could knock up a woman and move onto the next. Like in nature. Free crap from the government makes it even easier.

BC vs Goose, this will be great
Heck I won't even miss the mask threads today

I expect I've spent more time in Houston (especially post Katrina) than him. I have a different perspective.

Statistical data says conservatives have more kids than liberals. I can't make it any more clear than that. Your personal anecdotes are meaningless. I'll post some articles to back up my position. If you can put up some evidence showing baby daddy's/those on government/breeding puppies/hoodies have more kids than conservatives, I'd love to see it.

Okay, different angle. I'll bet more children born to conservatives know who their fathers are than liberals.

It's not so much how many you have, It's how many you expect the rest of us to support.

Nobody is saying there's aren't cases of hood rats having a ton of children by different fathers. But, conservatives still have more kids, on average, than liberals.

And it's not any sort of attempt to get a last word in. It's an invitation to a fact-based discussion on the subject at hand. I've presented 3 sources to support my position. I'd be more than happy to look at sources that dispute my position.

You are arguing something different. I have little doubt a liberal couple in NYC will have less children on average than a conservative couple in Nebraska.

I promise you that if you compared a white conservative couple in Nebraska to a black welfare mother in Houston, the black welfare mother in Houston will have more children on average. That is the topic that this thread has devolved into. We are talking about a subset of what may be lumped into the blue category. And by the way, I have zero faith in the categories. We have people on this site on welfare that claim to be conservative. As far as I am concerned, put them in the blue category.

I have done zero research on this but have spent enough time on this earth being annoyed about taxes and traveling to Houston, Dallas and Atlanta to have a rationale opinion.

None of these address the topic. I didn't read black, unwed welfare mother in any of them.

That ruined my day. Thanks Left Lane.

Not welfare, maggot......disability.....thanks to lawyers like you! What would we do without them!?

Wait....what two groups exactly are we comparing here? I'm talking about comparing conservatives overall to liberals overall. Comparing a conservative married couple in Nebraska to an unwed hoodrat in Chicago is an apples to oranges comparison, and not really relevant anyways, since those would be anecdotes, not statistics.

And keep in mind that hoodies are 13% of the population. They're representing themselves right well!

Arent there white hoodies?

He's one of them.

Boco sent us in the direction of the hoodrats.

And, it could be studied but why bother?

9% IS A HUGE NUMBER in a statistic like that . That influences the number of kids supported by both parents . I would bet that the number of kids not supported by both parents is higher in the group with lower marriage rates .
My self I don't see things as a color thing a such as "are you a producer or a parasite ' as for politicians its not a democrat or Republican thing as much as are you establishment or nonestablishmint . All demacrats will vote against the 2nd and no establishment Republican can be trusted either

Okay....
It's safe to assume that all hoodrats are liberal, or at least vote democrat. But you're picking out one small subset of liberals, you can't compare that subgroup to conservatives as a whole, that's not an apples to apples comparison.